National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines on Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression recommend urgent consideration of patients with spinal metastases and imaging evidence of structural spinal failure with spinal instability for surgery to stabilise the spine and prevent Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes of patients managed operatively and non-operatively. Prospective collection of 397 patients' data over a 4-year period. Males represented 59.2% of patients. Median age was 69 years. Non-operative intervention in 62.2% of patients. Prostate, lung, Breast, Myeloma, Renal Cell Carcinoma and Lymphoma accounted for over 75% of all primary tumours (n=305). Median Length of hospital stay was longer in the operative group of 15 days compared to 10 days in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). Patients who were ambulating on presentation maintained their ambulation in 70.2% of cases in the operative group compared to 90.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). However, upon discharge 41% of patients managed operatively were ambulatory compared to the non-operative group rate of 36.5% (p<0.0001). In Prostate, Breast, Myeloma, RCC and Lymphoma 100% of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation. Lung primaries managed operatively had an 80% chance of maintaining ambulation compared to 76.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.05) A higher proportion of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation than those managed operatively. With operative intervention, more patients regained ambulatory status. Whilst we have mainly focused on ambulatory status in this paper there are other factors to consider including pain relief and spinal stability which may be an indication for surgical intervention.
The aim of this study was test the amount of corrosion occurring at the (Ti) /cobalt chrome (CoCr) interface comparing this with Ti and Ti interfaces. This was compared with retrieved metal work visualised under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The interface of interest is the interface between rod and the screw. We investigated corrosion seen at that interface with a CoCr rod coupled to a Ti screw versus a Ti rod coupled to a Ti screw (6 screws were used) Implants were loaded according to the ASTM F2193 – 02 Standard Specifications and Test Methods for Components Used in the Surgical Fixation of the Spinal Skeletal System. Pitting potentials were monitored using cyclic potentiodynamic polarization tests (ASTM F2129 – 08 Standard Test Method for Conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarisation Measurements) to determine corrosion susceptibility. Retrieved implants were visualised under (SEM) to confirm corrosion.Aim:
Methods:
Due to absence of fusion in guided-growth devices for EOS (growing rods, Shilla, LSZ) movement of the rods against their attachment is possible resulting in wear debris formation. It is important to understand the wear resistance of materials used in these devices under appropriate conditions. The aim of our work was to investigate wear resistance of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V and superelastic Nitinol. Nitinol has been used recently for correcting scoliosis and may provide a better and more gradual correction than other materials.Introduction:
Aim:
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a powerful technique for correcting sagittal imbalance in ankylosing spondylitis. There has been significant perioperative morbidity associated with this technique in the peer review literature. We present the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital experience with a single surgeon retrospective study that was conducted to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Twenty seven patients underwent a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy and adjacent level posterior instrumentation between 1995 and 2010. There were 18 males and 9 females in the study. Events during the peri-operative course and post-operative complications were recorded. The radiological outcome and patient satisfaction were analysed with mean follow-up of one and a half years.Introduction
Method
There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the migration of femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty following the use of impaction allografting with or without cement. In some cemented series distal migration of the prosthesis within the cement mantle has been recorded, as well as migration of the whole cement/prosthesis construct into the graft. The results of 26 cases of revision hip replacement using femoral impaction allografting in the absence of bone cement are reported. The mean follow up was 8.5 years (range 4 to 17 years). The technique employed a Freeman stem coated proximally with hydroxyapatite. Three cases required further revision at 2, 4 and 5 years for high subsidence and unacceptable thigh pain. The remaining 23 cases stabilised following a period of initial settlement and overall results have been comparable to other series that have utilised cement. The initial sinkage in this series occurred mainly in the first six postoperative months. These results, from a single surgeon series, demonstrate that the method is highly technique dependent and relies on adequate graft impaction.Introduction
Method and Results
Our study investigated a consecutive series of 53 cal-caneal fractures treated at Southend General Hospital during a 4 year period. In total 75% were intrarticular and 25% extrarticular. Overall 51.92% of patients underwent operative intervention 66.67% of these being intrarticular. All patients underwent AOFAS scoring. The minimum followup period was 6 months and the average was 18 months. In the non-operative group (Undisplaced intra/extrarticular with Bohler’s angle 20–40 degrees) the <
50 year old group had an average AOFAS score of 86.3 versus 63.64 in the >
50 year old group. In the operative group the AOFAS score was heavily dependent upon restoration of Bohler’s angle. This study shows that if Bohler’s angle is <
20 degrees the average AOFAS score after followup was 51.00 but if the angle has been restored to >
20 degrees the average score is 69.53. This result is reinforced by the fact that 75% of patients returned to work in the >
20 degree Bohler’s angle group wheras only 33.34% returned to work in the <
20 degree group. This study shows that surgical restoration of Bohler’s angle to >
20 degrees gives a better outcome than for conservative treatment.
