Abstract

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used.

We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons.

Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation.

In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable.

Background

One of the major concerns of hinge knees have been reported in literature is mechanical failure. Failure in the form of component fracture (2–10%) and hinge dislocation/ failure are worrisome. In addition, higher risk of aseptic loosening with hinge knee prosthesis has been attributed to stress transfer at bone cement interface.

Aims

Our aim in this study was to describe a continuing review of 11 total hip arthroplasties using 22.225 mm Alumina ceramic femoral heads on a Charnley flanged femoral component, articulating against a silane crosslinked polyethylene.

Distal femoral replacement is an operation long considered as salvage operation for neoplastic conditions. Outcomes of this procedure for difficult knee revisions with bone loss of distal femur have been sparsely reported.

We present the early results of complex revision knee arthroplasty using distal femoral replacement implant, performed for severe osteolysis and bone loss.

Retrospective review of clinic and radiological results of 25 consecutive patients operated at single centre between January 2010 and December 2014. All patients had single type of implant. All data was collected till the latest follow up. Re-revision for any reason was considered as primary end point.

Mean age at surgery was 72.2 years (range 51 – 85 years). Average number of previous knee replacements was 2.28 (range 1 to 6). Most common indications were infection, aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture. Average follow up was 24.5 months (range: 3–63 months). 1 patient died 8 months post-op due to unrelated reasons. Re-revision rate was 2/25 (8%) during this period. One was re-revised for aseptic loosening and one was revised for peri-prosthetic fracture of femur. Two other peri-prosthetic fractures were managed by open reduction and internal fixation. All 3 peri-prosthetic fractures occurred with low energy trauma.

It is noteworthy that there was no hinge or mechanical failures of the implant. Peri-prosthetic fracture in 12% of patients in this series is of concern. There are no similar studies to compare this data with. The length of the stem, type of fixation of the stem, weight of the distal femoral component of implant can be postulated as factors contributing to risk of peri-prosthetic fracture.

Primary total hip replacement (THR) in patients with abnormal/altered proximal femoral anatomy/narrow canals presents a technical challenge. There are only limited standard prosthetic stems available to deal with narrow canals or abnormal morphology. Many prefer to use expensive custom implants which often have a lag time to manufacture and do not always have long term published outcomes.

We present results of the Asian C-stem (which is a standard implant available on the shelf) used in patients predominantly of Caucasian origin with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy.

We retrospectively reviewed clinic-radiological results of 131 patients (131 stems) who underwent primary THR using Asian C-stem at Wrightington Hospital till their latest follow up. Revision for any reason was considered as primary end point.

Mean age at surgery was 50.8 years (16 – 80). The 2 commonest indications were primary osteoarthritis (66 patients) and hip dysplasia (54 patients). Mean follow up was 43.5 months with a minimum follow up of 12 months and maximum follow up of 97 months. There were 2 recurrent dislocations and 1 hip subluxed twice. One dislocation needed revision surgery. 1 patient underwent acetabular revision for loosening. There was no stem failure, obvious loosening or loss of fixation in any patients in our series with regards to the Asian C-stem. There were no infections and intra-operative perforations or fractures.

C-stem Asian is a reliable implant for patients undergoing THR with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy or narrow canals. Long term follow up is essential.

Background: The most commonly used implant for the internal fixation of an extracapsular proximal femoral fracture is a sliding hip screw (SHS). More recently short intramedullary nails (IMN) have been advocated as an alternative, particularly for unstable fractures due to possible biomechanical advantages. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare, on the basis of evidence from randomised controlled trials, the fixation outcome with these two types of implant in stable and unstable fractures

Method: All randomised controlled studies comparing intramedullary nails with a SHS were considered for inclusion. Studies were identified using the search strategy of the Cochrane Collaboration, with no restriction on languages or source. Two authors independently extracted the data, and assessed trial methodology.

Results: 24 randomised trials involving 3202 patients with 3279 fractures were included in the analysis. Pooled results gave no statistically significant difference in the cut-out rate between the IMN or SHS 41/1556 and 37/1626 (Relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.82). There was an increased total failure rate (103/1495 and 58/1565, Relative risk 1.83; 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.50) and re-operation rate (57/1357 and 35/1415, Relative risk 1.63; 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.40) with the IMN compared the SHS when all fractures were considered. Fracture healing complications were much less frequent for stable fractures. No evidence for a reduced failure rate for IMN’s in unstable fractures patterns could be found.

Conclusions: The results from studies to date indicate an increased fixation failure rate for trochanteric fractures fixed with an intramedullary nail, and show no benefit to the use of a nail in unstable fractures. Therefore the use of intramedullary nails for trochanteric fractures cannot be recommended.

In 1997 the “step-less” SL Plus (Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) cementless total hip arthroplasty was introduced to our unit. During the passed 12 months, a retrospective study has been performed in order to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of this arthroplasty. The preliminary results of the first 50 patients to have completed the clinical and radiographic follow-up have been evaluated. Of the 50 patients, 56 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed, in all cases the SL Plus stem was used. In 52 cases the cementless Doetz acetabular cup, made by the same manufacturer, was used. The other 4 acetabular components were: 2 long stemmed cementless components for developmental dysplasia, 1 standard cementless cup and 1 cemented cup, made by other manufacturers. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically. The mean follow-up time was 3 years, range 2 – 5 years. The mean Harris Hip Score was 90 (37 – 100). Patient satisfaction was: 98% satisfied, 2% dissatisfied (p < 0.001). Radiographic assessment demonstrated that all 52 (100%) Doetz acetabular cups osseointegrated, with 53 (95%) acetabular cups osseointegrating in total (p < 0.002). Of the SL Plus stems, 44 (79%) osseointegrated (p < 0.002). The following post-operative complications were observed: 2 dislocations, 2 superficial wound infections, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 sciatic nerve palsy and 1 deep vein thrombosis. The overall complication rate is high at 13%, but with no implant related failures. Nevertheless, the preliminary clinical and radiographic results of the SL Plus stem and Doetz acetabu-lar cup total hip arthroplasty are encouraging.