Current standard of care in the management of bone and joint infection commonly includes a 4–6 week course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics but there is little evidence to suggest that oral antibiotic therapy results in worse outcomes. The primary objective was to determine whether oral antibiotics are non-inferior to IV antibiotics in this setting. This was a parallel group, randomised (1:1), open label, non-inferiority trial across twenty-six NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom. Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of bone, joint or orthopaedic metalware-associated infection who would ordinarily receive at least six weeks of antibiotics and who had received ≤7 days of IV therapy from the date of definitive surgery (or the start of planned curative treatment in patients managed non-operatively). Participants were randomised to receive either oral or IV antibiotics for the first 6 weeks of therapy. Follow-on oral therapy was permitted in either arm. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants experiencing definitive treatment failure within one year of randomisation. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7.5%.Aim
Method
In 1931, Gaenslen reported treatment of haematogenous calcaneal osteomyelitis through an incision on the sole of the heel, without the use of antibiotics. We have modified his approach to allow shorter healing times and early mobilisation in a modern series of cases. Sixteen patients with Cierny-Mader Stage IIIB chronic osteomyelitis were treated with split-heel incision, calcaneal osteotomy, radical excision, local antibiotics, direct skin closure and parenteral antibiotics. 4 patients had diabetic foot infection with neuropathy, 5 had infection after open injuries, 4 had haematogenous osteomyelitis and 3 had Grade 4 pressure ulceration with bone involvement. 14 had sinuses/ulcers and 12 had undergone previous surgery. Primary outcomes were eradication of infection, time to sinus/ulcer healing, mobility and need for modified shoes.Background:
Method:
