Introduction

Deformity of knee joint causes deviation of mechanical axis in the coronal plane, and the mechanical axis deviation also could adversely affect biomechanics of the ankle joint as well as the knee joint. Particularly, most of the patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have significant preoperative varus malalignment which would be corrected after TKA, the patients also may have significant changes of ankle joint characteristics after the surgery. This study aimed 1) to examine the prevalence of coexisting ankle osteoarthritis (OA) in the patients undergoing TKA due to varus knee OA and to determine whether the patients with coexisting ankle OA have more varus malalignment, and 2) to evaluate the changes of radiographic parameters for ankle joint before and 4 years after TKA.

Introduction

Even a number of studies have reported clinical outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty (revision TKA), little information is still available on whether outcomes of patients undergoing a revision TKA as a second stage procedure because of infected TKA are poorer than those of the patients undergoing a single-stage revision TKA because of non-infectious causes. In addition, use of various revision prostheses in most previous studies may limit solid interpretation of the outcomes after revision TKA. This study sought to determine whether outcomes in patients undergoing revision TKA due to infected TKA would be different from those in patients undergoing revision TKA due to non-infectious causes.

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven treatment method for advanced knee arthritis in terms of pain relief, function restoration, and quality-of-life improvement. The TKA use has increased significantly over the past decade and the growing rate is more prominent in Asian countries. Thus, the revision TKA may also increase in recent days, which represents a burden to the national health care system. To the best of our knowledge, little information is currently available regarding the incidence and related factors of revision TKA in Asian countries on the basis of nationwide database. This study sought to find the incidence of revision TKA and related factors in South Korea using national database from 2007 to 2012.

Introduction: We report the result of cervical osteotomy in 11 patients using a controlled reduction technique and assess the safety and efficacy of this operation. Methods: Between 1993 and 2006, 11 patients with ankylosing spondylitis underwent correction of cervical kyphosis utilizing an extension osteotomy at the C7/T1 junction. The procedure was carried out under general anaesthesia with spinal cord monitoring. Lateral mass screws were placed from C3–C6 and thoracic pedicle screws placed from T2 to T5. After completion of the osteotomy, the reduction manoeuvre was carried out by the senior surgeon lifting the halo, while bilateral temporary malleable rods (fixed to cervical lateral mass screws) were allowed to pass through top loading thoracic pedicle screws, before tightening by the assistant when the desired position had been achieved. The temporary malleable rods were then replaced with definitive rods, thereby creating a solid internal fixation. A halo vest was maintained for 12 weeks to support the instrumentation and allow the fusion mass to develop.

Results: Surgery was performed on 10 males and one female. The mean age at surgery was 56 years (range 40–74). Duration of symptoms averaged 2.7 years (range 1–5 yrs). The average duration of surgery was 4.7 hours (range 3–6.5) with a mean blood loss of 1938cc (range 1000–3600). The mean follow up was 6.5 years (range 2–13). The mean pre-op chin brow vertical angle was 54º (range 20–70) reducing to 7º (range 2–20) at final follow-up. The mean pre-operative kyphotic angle was 19.2º reducing to minus 34º at final follow up. Restoration of normal forward gaze was achieved in all cases. No patient suffered spinal cord injury or permanent nerve root palsy.

Conclusion: Cervico-thoracic osteotomy is a potentially hazardous procedure. The technique described reduces the risk of translation during the reduction manoeuvre thereby reducing the risk of serious neurological injury.

Introduction: Conventional reduction techniques for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis do not address important anatomical constraints on the L5 and S1 nerve roots, thereby leading to a significant risk of neurological deficit. We describe a novel three-stage reduction technique carried out in one operative session that respects these anatomical constraints. We report the results in seven cases.

Methods: Between 2000 and 2006, four female and three male adolescents with high-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 3 or greater) underwent this 3 stage procedure which included: I) extensive posterior decompression of L5 and S1 nerve roots plus sacral dome osteotomy. II) anterior L5/S1 discectomy. III) reduction of spondylolisthesis with pedicle screw fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion using interbody cages. Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials were used during the procedure. Patients were followed up for a mean of 4 years (range1–6). Sagittal balance was restored and assessed by measuring sacral slope, lumbosacral angle, pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 14.7 years (range 12–17) and average duration of symptoms was 13.7 months (range6–24). Mean operative time was 6.5 hours (range 5–8), with a mean blood loss of 2242cc (range1400–4200). The mean pre-op slip angle was 57°(range 45°–100°) and the mean post-op slip angle was 37.5°(range28°–57°). Anatomical reduction was achieved in six patients and one patient with spondyloptosis was reduced to grade 2. Sagittal balance was restored in all patients. There were no permanent neurological complications. One patient with grade 4 spondylolisthesis developed transient right L5 nerve root palsy which fully recovered within 3 months.

Conclusion: The safety and efficacy of this 3 stage reduction and stabilization procedure showed that immediate reduction of high grade spondylolisthesis with minimal risk of neurological deficit is possible. The procedure is technically demanding and should be performed by spinal surgeons familiar with the principles of anterior and posterior fusion.