Restoring more natural kinematics is crucial for the success of knee TKA. The relative size of the tibia to the femur may differ in each patient and requires the possibility to combine different tibia sizes for a given femur size. Therefore, TKA systems need to be designed to allow for different size combinations. In literature some report higher revision rates when the femoral size is greater than the tibia, while others find no impact of the size mismatch on the clinical outcome. The tibio-femoral kinematics resulting from different size combinations has not been analyzed yet. The Columbus Deep Dish implant (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) is designed to allow a full size compatibility. Therefore we hypothesized that the kinematics would not be affected by the different size combinations. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact on kinematics of different tibio-femoral size combinations with the Columbus Deep Dish implant. 6 fresh frozen cadavers were tested in a force controlled well established knee rig after implantation of a cruciate retaining, fixed bearing Columbus Deep Dish TKA (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. Specifically developed and manufactured inlays allowed simulating different tibia sizes on each bone/tibial implant. For each cadaver, a total of 4 different tibia sizes were tested (1 original size, 3 simulated different sizes). Tibio-femoral internal/external rotation and antero-posterior translation of the medial and of the lateral condyles were computed for all size combinations. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the kinematics obtained with the original inlay. For each flexion angle from 30° to 130°, the difference between the rotation (resp. translation) obtained with the original inlay was subtracted from the rotation obtained with the simulated tibia size. The mean value and standard deviation of the differences were computed.Objectives
Methods
Wear is an important factor in the long term success of total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, wear testing methods and machines become a standard in research and implant development. These methods are based on two simulation concepts which are defined in standards ISO 14243-1 and 14243-3. The difference in both concepts is the control mode. One is force controlled while the other has a displacement controlled concept. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stresses within the different ISO concepts. Furthermore the force controlled ISO was updated in the year 2009 and should be compared with the older which was developed in 2001. A finite element model based on the different ISO standards was developed. A validation calculated with kinematic profile data of the same implant (Aesculap, Columbus CR) in an experimental wear test setup (Endolap GmbH) was done. Based on this model all three different ISO standards were calculated and analysed. Validation results showed Pearson correlation for anterior posterior movement of 0.3 and for internal external rotation 0.9. Two main pressure maximums were present in ISO 14243-1:2001 (force controlled) with 17.9 MPa and 13.5 MPa for 13 % and 48 % of the gait cycle. In contrast ISO 14243-1:2009 (force controlled) showed three pressure maximums of 18.5 MPa (13 % of gait cycle), 16.4 MPa (48 % of gait cycle) and 13.2 MPa (75 % of gait cycle). The displacement controlled ISO (14243-3:2014) showed two pressure maximums of 16.0 MPa (13 % of gait cycle) and 17.2 MPa (48 % of gait cycle). The adapted force controlled ISO of the year 2009 showed higher mechanical stress during gait cycle which also might lead to higher wear rates. The displacement controlled ISO leads to higher mechanical stress because of the constraint at the end of the stance phase of the gait cycle. Future studies should analyse different inlay designs within these ISO standards.
Despite consequent advancement in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) up to 20% of patients are not satisfied after having been operated. Beside correct implantation, the design of the TKA-system is supposed to be a key factor of a successful TKA. Consequently it has been tried to restore natural kinematics by the design of the prosthesis. A medially stabilized design therefore is supposed to allow a lateral translation with a medial pivot. Our study compared posterior stabilized (PS) with medially stabilized (MS) TKA-design in terms of kinematics, femorotibial and patellofemoral contact patterns in vitro.Introduction
Objectives
A pain free motion of the patella after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still a challenge for surgeons and TKA-designers today. After TKA, the restricted guidance of the patella and kinematic alterations of the femorotibial joint results in increased retropatellar pressure and unphysiological patellar tracking. The alignment of the prosthetic components can influence patellofemoral stresses and tracking of the patella. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the consequences of different alignments of the tibial baseplate on patellar stress and knee kinematics. Different alignments of the tibial baseplate were simulated with five different UHMWPE-Inlets. Inserts with medial and lateral translation (±3mm; Figure 1A) as well as internal and external rotation (±3°; Figure 1B) were manufactured. Original inlays were used to define the neutral position. Eight human knee specimens without TKA were tested in a custom made knee rig. This rig mimics a loaded squat from approximately 20°−120° of flexion under six degrees of freedom in the knee joint. Retropatellar pressure (IScan, Tekscan, USA) as well as knee kinematics (CMS 20, Zebris, Germany) were recorded during squatting. Afterwards, TKA components were implanted in a neutral position via subvastus approach in tibia first technique. Each of the 5 tibial inlets was tested consecutively with the knee rig under the same conditions. Results were compared using mixed effects models with a random intercept per specimen. Component alignment as well as moving direction (flexion/extension) and flexion degree were defined as fixed effects in our model (SPSS, IBM, USA). After TKA in neutral position, retropatellar peak pressure increased by 0.71MPa (p<0.01), femorotibial rollback was reduced (−2.24mm; p<0.01) and the patella kinematics, in particular patella flexion (−2.02°; p<0.01) and rotation (−0.97°; p<0.01), were changed during squatting. Compared to the neutral position, internal rotation of the tibial baseplate increased retropatellar pressure by 0.20 MPa, while an external rotation provided a reduction of −0.24 MPa (p<0.01). In contrast a medialization or lateralization showed no effect on retropatellar pressure (p=0.09). Both, rotation and translation of the tibial baseplate influenced tibiofemoral kinematics significantly. A reduction of the femorotibial rollback was measured in external alignment (rotation and lateral translation; both p<0.01). An internal rotation showed more femoral rollback (0.93mm p<0.01). Patellar kinematics was changed primarily by component translation rather than rotation. A lateralisation of the tibial baseplate resulted in a medial shift of the patella by −0.43mm and vice versa (p<0.01). Rotation of the tibial baseplate had no influence on the patella shift (p=0.8) The findings in this study suggest that the alignment of the tibial baseplate influences patellar biomechanics significantly in vitro. An external rotation of the tibial baseplate decreased retropatellar pressure and patella kinematics tend more to the in situ situation of a natural knee. An internal alignment of the tibial baseplate seems to reconstruct natural tibiofemoral rollback in parts. However, studies (i.e. Nicoll et al.) show higher anterior knee pain by an internal alignment and a higher rollback after TKA might lead to higher wear.
