Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is an uncommon condition with potentially severe complications including avascular necrosis (AVN) and chondrolysis. Children with a ‘slip’ are at a significantly higher risk of a contralateral slip. Controversy remains as to when to undertake prophylactic pinning. The primary aim of this study was to assess the Posterior Sloping Angle (PSA, as described by Barrios et al in 2005) as a predictor for contralateral slip in a large, multi ethnic cohort. All consecutive patients treated for SUFE presenting to Waikato Hospital between January 2000 and December 2009 were identified via medical coding. Patients without radiographs and those with bilateral slips on presentation were excluded. Clinical records were reviewed to document demographic data, slip characteristics and follow up outcomes. Radiographic analysis of the PSA in the unaffected hip was performed by a single author. Statistical analysis was performed using a student's t-test with Microsoft Excel 2003. 182 patients were identified, 50 were excluded [26 bilateral slips, 24 no radiograph available] to total a study population of 132 patients. 93 patients were male [72%]. Mean age was 11.8 years [6.2–15.6 years]. 72% were of Maori ethnicity and 26% were of New Zealand European descent. 90 patients [69%] had a unilateral slip, 42 [32%] had a contralateral slip. 48% were not followed until physeal closure and 50% did not attend at least one scheduled appointment Mean PSA of those with a unilateral slip was 10.8° [2–21°]. Patients who subsequently developed a contralateral slip had a statistically significantly higher mean PSA of 17.2° [6–36°] [p<0.0001]. Children with a contralateral slip were significantly younger 11.1 years than those with a unilateral slip 12.2 years (p<0.0001). No significant differences in PSA were found between Maori and NZ European children. If a PSA of 14° was used as an indication for prophylactic fixation in this population 35/42 [83.3%] of contralateral slips would have been prevented. 19/90 hips would have been pinned unnecessarily. The number needed to treat demonstrates that 1.79 hips are prophylactically pinned to prevent one slip in this population. This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a PSA of 14° in an unaffected hip after one sided SUFE could warrant prophylactic pinning in an unaffected hip to prevent subsequent slip and the complications associated with this, potentially protecting a population that can be difficult to follow up.
Both cross and lateral pinning are common techniques used for displaced supracondylar elbow fractures in children. Our study aims to determine whether there are any radiological differences in outcome between the two techniques. Most recent studies involving radiological evaluation of supracondylar fractures had concentrated on use of Bauman's angle or humerocapitellar angles. Rotational displacement, which has been shown to be critical for stability, is often not adequately addressed. Our evaluation measures both linear displacement using Bauman's angle and rotational displacement through the measurement of the lateral rotational percentage (LRP). We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of all type III supracondylar fractures reduced with either crossed pins (one medial and one lateral, one medial and two lateral) or lateral pins (two or three lateral) between 2002 and 2006 at the Royal Children's Hospital. A good quality AP and lateral radiograph taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the first follow up session was required for patients to be included in the study. Those that had LRP change of greater than 10% were further investigated.Introduction
Method
The purpose was to present a case of cauda equina entrapment in a lumbar burst fracture with associated lamina fracture and to review the literature and assess the appropriateness of current practices for cauda equina decompression. Reported incidence of cauda equina entrapment in the lamina fracture of lumbar burst fractures is 13–17%. Anterior surgery alone for decompressing the cauda equina in patients with lumbar burst fractures and associated lamina fractures will not always address the problem. We therefore suggest that posterior exploration may be the preferred approach if the aim of surgery is to decompress the neural elements.