Introduction: Primary bones sarcomas account for 5% of childhood cancers; however the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and the development of surgical techniques have resulted in reduced mortality and a longer length of survival. Consequently improving post operative functional outcomes has become an important focus of research. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare differences in the complications and functional outcomes of EPR and rotationplasty in skeletally immature patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective case control study of twenty-four patients, of whom twelve received rotation-plasty and twelve received EPR. Patients were selected at random and matched according to age at diagnosis, sex, site of disease and date of surgery. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score was used to evaluate functional outcome, and surgical complications were assessed qualitatively.

Results: Five patients (42%) treated with endoprosthe-ses experienced some form of post-operative surgical complication compared to three patients (25%) treated with rotationplasty. However this difference was not found to be statistically significant. The average MSTS score in the EPR cohort was 22.7 and 18.9 in rotation-plasty patients. Mann Whitney U testing confirmed this difference to be statistically significant (p=0.05).

Discussion: The study showed that patients who received EPR suffered more surgical complications than rotationplasty patients. However the results demonstrated superior functional outcomes in patients who received EPR.

The theoretical benefit historically attributed to rota-tionplasty lies in the provision of a functional and durable hinge joint, however these results suggest that this advantage has been negated by modern endoprostheses, probably due to improvements in surgical experience and prosthesis technology.

Conclusion: Our experience shows that patients with EPR are more likely to suffer more surgical complications but have similar, if not better functional outcomes compared to rotationplasty.

Introduction: Limb preserving surgery in children with bone sarcoma remains a significant challenge as most are expected to survive their disease and put significant functional loads on their reconstructed limbs. The most common reconstructions used for children with lower limb sarcomas are endoprosthetic replacements and rotationplasty. This study aimed to investigate and compare differences in the complications and functional outcomes between these two methods of reconstruction.

Methods: This is a retrospective case control study of 12 rotationplasty patients and 12 patients who received EPR. Patients were selected at random from records provided by both centres and matched according to age at diagnosis, sex, site of disease and date of surgery. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score was used to evaluate functional outcome, and surgical complications were assessed qualitatively.

Results: Five patients (42%) treated with endoprostheses experienced some form of post-operative surgical complication compared to three patients (25%) treated with rotationplasty and one patient from each group required an amputation to treat the complications. The average MSTS score was 22.7 in the EPR cohort and 18.9 in rotationplasty patients. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.05).

Discussion: The study showed that patients who received EPR suffered more surgical complications than rotationplasty patients. However the results demonstrated superior functional outcomes in patients who received EPR.

These results suggest that the functional benefit historically attributed to rotationplasty has been negated by modern endoprostheses, probably due to improvements in surgical experience and prosthesis technology.

Conclusion: Our experience shows that patients with EPR are more likely to suffer more surgical complications but have similar, if not better functional outcomes compared to rotationplasty.