Anatomical reduction of unstable Lisfranc injuries is crucial. Evidence as to the best methods of surgical stabilization remains sparse, with small patient numbers a particular issue. Dorsal bridge plating offers rigid stability and joint preservation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the medium-term functional outcomes for patients treated with this technique at our centre. Additionally, we review for risk factors that influence outcomes. 85 patients who underwent open reduction and dorsal bridge plate fixation of unstable Lisfranc injuries between January 2014 and January 2019 were identified. Metalwork was not routinely removed. A retrospective review of case notes was conducted. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire summary index (MOXFQ-Index) was the primary outcome measure, collected at final follow-up, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale, complications, and all-cause re-operation rates were secondary outcome measures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with poorer outcomes.Background
Methods
External fixators are common surgical orthopaedic treatments for the management of complex fractures and in particular, the use of circular frame fixation within patients requiring limb reconstruction. It is well known that common complications relating to muscle length and patient function without rehabilitation can occur. Despite this there remains a lack of high-quality clinical trials in this area investigating the role of physiotherapy or rehabilitation in the management of these patients. We aim to complete a systematic review of rehabilitation techniques for patients undergoing external fixator treatment for Limb Reconstruction of the lower limb. A comprehensive search of AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases was conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion, using a search strategy developed in collaboration with a research librarian. Inclusion criteria consisted of adults aged 18 years and over who have experienced leg trauma (open fracture, soft tissue damage), elective leg deformity corrective surgery, bone infection or fracture non-union who have been treated with the use of an external fixator for fixation. Specific exclusion criteria were patients below the age of 18 years old, patients with cancer, treatment of the injury with internal nail, patients who underwent amputation, the use of external fixators for soft tissue contracture management, editorials, comment papers, review papers, conference proceedings and non-English papers. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for suitability by pairs of reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria using Rayyan QCRI online software. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion with three independent specialist senior reviewers. Following full text screening, references lists of included articles were manually searched to ensure that all relevant studies were identified. Due to lack of evidence, forward searching was also completed for studies included in the review. Data quality was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool and the CERT assessment tool was utilised to look at completeness of reporting of exercise interventions.Introduction
Materials & Methods
A greater emphasis has been placed on fracture related infection (FRI) orthopaedic practice as a separate entity in recent years. Since the publication of the FRI consensus definition and guidelines, there has been an increase in the published literature on the topic and a move towards considering FRI as separate from general orthopaedic practice and as work that requires a more specialist approach. The aim of this study was to audit current FRI practice in the UK. Orthopaedic practice related to FRI in the UK was audited using a semi-structured questionnaire. Respondents were from a range of institutions, specialties and clinical roles to reflect the multi-disciplinary nature of treating FRI. The online tool SurveyMonkey was used to share the survey at the 2022 annual meeting of the British Limb Reconstruction Society. Twenty-one questions were asked in the following domains: scope of practice, theatre and clinic capacity, availability of the multidisciplinary team, renumeration for work and scope of FRI networks.Introduction
Materials & Methods
Fracture related infections (FRI) following intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures remain challenging to treat with associated high patient morbidity and healthcare costs. Recently, antibiotic-coated nails have been introduced as a strategy to reduce implant related infection rates in high-risk patients. We present the largest single-centre case series on ETN PROtect® outcomes reporting on fracture union, infection rates and treatment complications. 56 adult patients underwent surgery with ETN PROtect® between 01/09/17 and 31/12/20. Indications consisted of acute open fractures and complex revision cases (FRI, non-union surgery and re-fracture) with a mean of 3 prior surgical interventions. 51 patients had an open fracture as their index injury. We report on patient characteristics and outcomes including radiological/clinical union and deep infection. The one-year minimum follow-up rate was 87.5%.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Segmental bone defect is a challenging problem. We report our experience of bone transport by hexapod external fixator in patients with segmental defects if the tibia. We report herein 15 patients with segmental bone defect of tibia who completed their treatment protocol. All patients were treated had bone transport with Taylor Spatial Frame from 2012 to 2017. All were treated by the senior author NH. Parameters measured included age, sex, diabetes, smoking, diagnosis, method of fixation prior to treatment use of a free flap, bone defect size, frame-time, external fixation index.Introduction
Method
Diabetes is a poor prognostic indicator after an acute ankle fracture. Many surgeons avoid essential surgery due to their concerns regarding complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of complication rates for acute ankle fractures in diabetics with a control non-diabetic patient treated by all surgeons in our unit and assessed factors for success including long-segment fixation methodologies. Patient records were cross-referenced with departmental databases and a retrospective review of all ankle fractures managed in our department was conducted from 2014. All patients subjected to a retrospective review of their notes and assessment of their follow up for at least 6 months. Radiographs were assessed of the ankle before and at completion of treatment were reviewed independently (RA and FR). We identified all patients with a diabetic ankle fracture their HB1Ac (for diabetic control) and systematic co-morbidities. Fractures were classified into unimalleolar, bi malleolar and trimalleolar and surgery grouped into standard or long-segment-rigid fixation. Statistical analysis was conducted using absolute/relative risk (RR); numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. We compared a control-group, a diabetic group managed conservatively, and undergoing surgery; comparing the concept of rigid fixation. Further sub-analysis conducted to assess differences between diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Ethics approval was granted as per our institutional policy by our governance lead. We identified 64 patients with a diabetic ankle fractures, their fracture pattern and a control group. Thirty-one had conservative treatment; 33 had operative fixation of which 13 had rigid fixation. Compared to the control (n=32) both diabetic groups had a higher risk of possible complication. The relative risk was between 3.1–3.4 (P<0.002) and linked to systematic complications of diabetes e.g. neuropathy 5.9 (P<0.003); HBA1c 4.6 P<0.004); and neuropathy and retinopathy 6.2 P<0.0003). We observed RR is reduced for a complication occurring following surgery with prolonged immobilization (0.86) and rigid fixation (0.65) and NNT required to see a benefit from rigid fixation was 7. The overall RR for a complication was similar between conservative and surgical management (4.6 vs.5.1). We agree diabetics have a higher risk for complications than non-diabetics, however the risk is not as great as previously reported. There is little difference in surgical or conservative treatment but strong evidence indicating rigid long-segment-fixation with prolonged-immobilization could improve the risk benefit ratio when compared to non- operative management alone but further evaluation is required.
The mid foot joints are usually the first to be affected in Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN). Reconstruction is technically demanding and fraught with complications. We present our experience of mid foot fusion in CN from a tertiary diabetic foot centre. We undertook mid foot corrective fusion in 27 feet (25 patients). Twelve of these had concurrent hind foot fusion. Eleven patients had type 1 diabetes, 12 had type 2 and 2 were non-diabetics. 23 patients were ASA grade 3 and 2 were ASA 2. 21 feet had ulcers preoperatively and mean HbA1c was 8.2. 13 patients had diabetic retinopathy and 6 had nephropathy.Introduction
Patients and methods
