Implant infections caused by 4497-IgG1targeting Aim
Methods
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult. All current diagnostic tests have problems with accuracy and interpretation of results. Many new tests have been proposed, but there is no consensus on the place of many of these in the diagnostic pathway. Previous attempts to develop a definition of PJI have not been universally accepted and there remains no reference standard definition. This paper reports the outcome of a project developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and supported by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Implant-Associated Infections (ESGIAI). It comprised a comprehensive review of the literature, open discussion with Society members and conference delegates, and an expert panel assessment of the results to produce the final guidance.Aims
Methods
To retrospectively evaluate infection eradication rate of DAIR procedures performed in our tertiary referral center. We analyzed whether the outcome was influenced by time of infection after arthroplasty, previous surgery or causative pathogen. We retrospectively collected data of 81 patients treated with DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections after hip (n=48) and knee (n=33) arthroplasty between 2011 and 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: acute early infections (occurring <4 weeks, 29 cases), late chronic infections (occurring >4 weeks postoperative, 49 cases) and acute haematogenous infections (occuring >3 months after surgery with symptoms less than 4 weeks, 3 cases). Primary outcome was successful infection eradication after treatment within one year. Eradication failure was determined as unplanned subsequent surgery because of persistent infection, use of suppressive antibiotics or signs of infection at one year follow-up.Aim
Methods
Here we describe a cohort study to determine the performance of a commercially available Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)-kit on samples of 65 consecutive patients suspected of orthopedic implant associated infections (IAI). Culture is routinely used and has a high specificity and sensitivity but requires days to more than a week for slow growing bacteria. FISH results are available within 45–60 minutes and thus specific treatment can start immediately. In addition, previous antibiotic therapy may hinder culture while bacteria may still be detected by FISH. The hemoFISH-kit from Miacom diagnostics (Dusseldorf, Germany) was used on a total of 82 joint aspirates, sonication fluids and tissue samples of 65 consecutive patients to detect and identify possible microorganisms. This FISH-kit contains a universal 16S rRNA probe and species-specific probes for bacteria commonly encountered in blood infections. FISH and culture were compared to the clinical definition of IAI. These definitions were based on the criteria described by Pro-Implant Foundation criteria for IAI after fracture fixation or prosthetic joint infection. If no criteria were described in the literature for a specific IAI then MSIS criteria were used.Aim
Method
