There is increasing knowledge regarding the functional outcome of patients following posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions of the spine. There is less known regarding the expectations patients have for spinal surgery and how that may relate to commonly reported surgical outcome measures. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome. and outcome as quantified by both physician reported outcome and patient derived generic and disease-specific measures.

Patient expectations for surgery were evaluated in one hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions (single institution, two surgeons).

SF-36+Oswestry disability was quantified preoperatively, and serially postoperatively. Preoperative expectations (pain relief, sleep, recreational, ADL, work return) were documented and postoperative expectations quantified at time of anticipated maximal medical improvement (6mos decompressions,1yr with fusions). Mean preoperative SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were 3.4 and 1.2 S.D. below age/gender matched Canadian norms. Although patients reported improvements in SF-36+Oswestry scores following surgery, mean SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were still 2 and 1.5 S.D. below norms. Mean Oswestry disability improved from 48.7%±1.7% to 23.1±1.9%.

Expectations for surgery were met in 81%(responders:143/155). Of 19%(27/143) where expectations were not met, 6/27 have either nonunion, technical, or medical factors. There was no difference in mean age, gender, comorbidity, procedure type and follow-up comparing patients where expectations were met to those that were not. Patients where expectations were not met reported lower preoperative SF-36 (GH and VT) domain scores (p=0.02 and 0.04, respectively), however, preoperative Oswestry, SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were not significantly different. Patients were less satisfied if they had prior lumbar surgery (p=0.02) or involved in WCB/litigation (p< 0.001).

We note 15%(21/143) where expectations were not met and there were no apparent surgical or medical confounds to account. There are likely other factors that may influence patient perception and expectation for treatment which requires further study.

The management of spinal metastases is palliative and aimed at improving quality of life at an acceptable risk. This population study uses administrative databases and measures survivorship and complication rates after surgery for spinal metastases. The effects of various potential predictor variables were evaluated. We identified 987 patients with a median survival for all types of cancer of 227 days. The one and three-month mortality was 9% and 29%, respectively. Increasing age, male gender and primary lung cancer were significant risk factors for death within 30 days of surgery. A preoperative neurological deficit contributed a 19% increase in mortality and a 71% increase in the risk of postoperative wound infection. We found an overall major complication rate of 27%. This information will provide patients, families and clinicians with objective data which will help in the choice of treatment and the understanding of the surgical risk and outcome.

A retrospective review, comparing outcome following circumferential versus anterior decompression and fusion for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

To assess the safety and efficacy of the circumferential operation for CSM.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy has traditionally been managed by anterior or posterior decompression with/ without fusion. However, there is a considerable variation in neurological recovery and clinical outcome following these procedures. While circumferential decompression and fusion has been shown to provide superior neurological outcome in selected patients with cervical trauma and tumours, its role in the management of CSM has yet to be clearly defined.

Fifteen patients who underwent a 360° operation (Groupl) for CSM were matched (age, number of levels operated and follow-up duration) with patients (Group 2, n=15), that underwent anterior decompression and fusion for the same problem. All patients were operated by a single surgeon and reviewed independently. Charts, radiographs, patient interviews and MODEMS Cervical Spine Outcome questionnaires were the basis for assessment.

The operative time, blood loss, in-hospital stay and post-operative complications were higher in group l. The pseudoarthrosis rate was comparable though a trend towards increased graft and hardware problems was noted in group 2. Neurological improvement as measured by the mJOA Myelopathy Scale was significantly better (p = 0. 039) in group 1. 87% of those in group1 and 67% in group 2 showed improved function. Patients in group1 also performed better (p=0. 056) in the neurological domain and treatment expectation scales of the cervical spine questionnaire, though the incidence of post-op, neck pain was higher.

Single stage circumferential spinal decompression and fusion permits consistent neurological recovery in selected patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and it can be performed with limited morbidity.

A province-wide study designed to use administrative data to determine the rate of post-operative complications, the survival duration and predictors of outcome among patients undergoing surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

Surgery for patients with spinal metastasis is primarily palliative. It is often fraught with complications, which may in fact diminish quality of life. Quantification of survival rates and the risk of potential complications following surgery is important to the clinician and the patient’s families for decision making.

All patients that underwent surgery for spinal metastasis between 1991 and 1998 were identified using the Ontario health insurance database and a hospital discharge registry.

The mean age at surgery was 60. 3 years (range: 13–92 years). The mortality files identified patients who were dead by October 1999. Information about individual inpatient admissions including post-operative complications was then collected. The survival rates and complications following surgery were quantified and the effect of several variables on these two parameters was computed.

The median and mean survival was 227 days and 793. 4 days respectively. The 30-day and 3-month mortality were 9% and 29% respectively. Advanced age at surgery, male sex, presence of a pre-operative neurological deficit and primary cancers of lung, gastrointestinal tract & melanoma are predictive of poor survival. 39% patients had complications. Pre-operative neurological deficit was associated with a 71% higher risk of developing post-op. wound infection.

In the past, surgery has been recommended in patients with an anticipated survival of at least three to six months. The current study shows that even patients preselected on the basis of predictions of longer survival, there is a potential for early mortality and significant complications. Hence, a careful estimation of the benefits of surgery versus surgery related morbidity must be made prior to offering surgery for palliation.