Femoral components with an oxidized zirconium-niobium (OxZr) gradient ceramic surface (Oxinium, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) were introduced as an alternative to cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy femoral components for the purpose of PE wear reduction in total knee replacements [1]. In the present study, the surface damage and clinical performance of both CoCr alloy and OxZr femoral components were investigated. By matching CoCr alloy and OxZr femoral components for clinical factors, as done by Heyse et al. [2], the surface damage on retrieved CoCr alloy and OxZr femoral component was assessed. Twenty-six retrieved cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy femoral components were matched with twenty-six retrieved oxidized zirconium (OxZr) femoral components for implantation period, body-mass index, patient gender, implant type (cruciate ligament retaining/substituting), and polyethylene insert thickness. Detailed surface profilometry was performed on retrieved femoral condyles in areas that had not been damaged by gouging [3] with the specific purpose of investigating the in vivo wear behaviour of undamaged OxZr surface. In addition, the cumulative survivorships were calculated for patients who had received CoCr alloy or OxZr femoral components from our orthopaedic database. In order to identify factors that affect the clinical performance of CoCr alloy and OxZr femoral components, the findings from the retrieval analysis and the survivorship analysis were combined. The Rp, Rpm, and Rpk-values for the retrieved CoCr alloy femoral components were found significantly higher than the Rp, Rpm, and Rpk-values for the retrieved OxZr femoral components (p ≤ 0.031). The roughness parameters values (Ra, Rq, Rz, Rp, Rpm, Rpk, Rv, and Rsk) for the retrieved CoCr alloy femoral components were found significantly higher than the values of the new, never implanted CoCr alloy femoral components (p ≥ 0.001). The surface roughness was higher on the medial condyles than the lateral condyles of the retrieved CoCr alloy femoral components; such a difference was not observed on the retrieved OxZr femoral components. The OxZr bearing surface appeared to protect the femoral components from abrasive wear in vivo. At 8.5-years follow up, the cumulative survivorship for the CoCr alloy femoral components (98%) was not found to be statistically significantly different (p = 0.343, Breslow test) from the OxZr femoral components (97.5%). Therefore, OxZr femoral components appeared to possess low wear characteristics and could be particularly suitable for younger, heavier patients to ensure long-term durability.

Ceramic-on-ceramic (C-C) total hip replacements (THRs) are an attractive option for young, active patients [1, 2]. However, more clinical data is necessary to establish the reasons of failure of contemporary C-C THRs in vivo. The objective of the present study was to assess the surface damage on retrieved C-C THRs and determine possible influential factors that may explain their in vivo performance. Thirty-five C-C retrievals of material type Biolox® forte (n=28) and Biolox® delta (n=7) (CeramTec AG, Plochingen, Germany) were collected after a mean of 3.7 ± 3.2 years in vivo. Semi-quantitative surface damage assessment [3] was performed on all retrievals to obtain both a damage score (DS) (Fig. 1). Contact profilometry was performed on the retrieved femoral heads to characterize the type of surface damage (metal transfer, stripe wear). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained from two femoral heads displaying areas of typical surface damage. The implantation period correlated with the damage score (DS) of the femoral heads (R=0.573, p<0.001) and the acetabular cups (R=0.592, p<0.001). However, the metal transfer DS of the femoral heads did not correlate with implantation period (R=0.185, p=0.29). Surface roughness of metal-transfer areas were positively skewed (additive metal transfer) while the stripe damage areas were negatively skewed (grain removal), as evidenced by SEM analysis. Stripe damage was observed on both the Biolox® forte and Biolox® delta retrieved femoral heads; however, the extent of grain removal appeared less severe on the Biolox® delta retrieved femoral heads due to their overall smaller grain size (Fig. 2). Inclination angles > 45° was associated with a greater DS rate [DS/time of implantation], which had also been suggested elsewhere [4]. Four patients reported squeaking in their C-C THRs; one of which was a 54 yr-old male patient who completed three full marathons with his implant. In this his case, the DS for this retrieval was below average, with metal-transfer being the only macroscopic damage feature. Fracture of the acetabular liner occurred in three patients, all of which had malpositioned components. Metal-transfer on the ceramic surface could possibly cause a local break down of the fluid film and may facilitate, in addition to an increased inclination angle, stripe damage via an adhesive wear mechanism. Therefore, direct contact between the Ti-alloy acetabular shell and the ceramic femoral head should be avoided at primary surgery. C-C THRs remain an attractive option for young, active patients, but care must be taken during implantation to appropriately position the acetabular cup and to avoid unwanted metal-transfer as such alteration at the bearing interface may change implant tribology.