Hindquarter amputations for bone or soft tissue sarcoma cause a high degree of disability in patients and are associated with high morbidity rates. The goal of this study is to determine prognostic factors for outcome and analyse quality of life after resection, in order to better select patients who are more likely to benefit from a hindquarter amputation. Our prospectively collected database was searched for all patients treated with a hindquarter amputation between 1989 and 2015. Clinical and histopathological features were analysed for their prognostic value using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis. Endpoints were set at recurrent disease and death. Also, functional and social outcome as well as pain was assessed from the hospital charts in the patients that are still alive. 82 patients underwent a hindquarter resection in the given time frame. Of these patients, 63 were treated with a curative intent. The median hospital stay was 25 days, and 49% of the patients had wound complications. The in-hospital mortality was 6%. The 5-year overall survival in the whole group was 31%, while disease free survival was 26%. As expected, patients with metastases at presentation had a significantly worse outcome, while patients with locally recurrent sarcoma had the same outcome as patients with primary sarcoma. For those patients treated with curative intent, younger age was correlated with better survival, while higher histological grade was correlated with worse disease free survival. The functional and social outcome for patients who survived more then one year varied widely, with about 50% of the patients living an acceptable social life with reasonable pain levels and mobility status. Hindquarter amputations for sarcoma patients are still indicated for a select group of patients. Younger patients and/or patients with low grade sarcomas are more likely to benefit form this resection in terms of survival and long term function. However, for patients with less favourable prognostic factors a hindquarter operation might be an unreasonable palliative option.
