In the retrieval analysis of explanted hip joints, the estimation of wear volume and visualization of wear pattern are commonly used to evaluate in-vivo performance. While many studies report wear volumes from explanted hips, it is important to understand the limitations of these estimates including the sources and magnitude of uncertainty of the reported results. This study builds on a previous uncertainty analysis by Carmignato et al. to quantify the magnitude of uncertainty caused by the assumption that the as-manufactured shape of an explanted hip component is a perfect sphere.

Synthetic data sets representing idealized measurements of spheroidal explants (prolate, oblate and pinched) with a nominal diameter of 50 mm were generated. These data sets represent the shape and magnitude of form deviations observed for explanted hip components (Figure 1). Data were simulated for either unworn components or those with a known volume and magnitude of wear simulated to represent 5 µm penetration of a 49.90 mm femoral head into an acetabular cup (Table 1). The volume of wear and wear pattern were estimated using a custom Matlab script developed for analysis of metrology data from explanted hip joints. This script fits a least squares sphere to data points in unworn, as manufactured regions of the surface to estimate the as-manufactured shape of the component. The diameter of the best fit sphere, and wear volume were compared to the known wear depths and volumes from the synthetic datasets.

The results showed that the Matlab script estimated a wear volume of up to 1.4 mm³ for an unworn cup with a radial deviation of 10 µm. The maximum error of 13.3 mm³ was for a pinched cup with wear at the pole. The complete results are shown in Table 2.

In some cases with aspherical form deviations, the least squares sphere fitted to the synthetic data was displaced in the Z direction with respect to the origin of the spheroid and the radius of the least squares sphere was outside the range of the principal radii of the spheroid. For instance, in case 5, the center was shifted 22 µm vertically from the mathematical center.

The results from this study show that the magnitude of uncertainty due to form deviations on wear volume varies depending on the shape and magnitude of the form deviations and in some cases was greater than 10 mm³. A further important finding is that in some instances, the diameter and center of the least squares sphere fitted to the unworn regions may not be consistent with the mathematical radius and center of the synthetic data. This may have important implications for the “reverse engineering” of the as-manufactured dimensions from worn explanted hip joints.

Please contact authors directly for the figure:

Figure 1 Graphical depiction of a) synthetic data set, b) deviation map of a hemispherical acetabular cup with simulated wear, c) deviation map of a prolate spheroid with simulated wear at rim with color bar set to ±5 microns, d) deviation map of pinched ellipsoid with simulated wear at 45 degrees from pole.

Introduction

There is considerable interest in the orthopaedic community in understanding the multifactorial process of taper fretting corrosion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies have identified some patient and device factors associated with taper damage, including length of implantation, stem flexural rigidity, and head offset. Due to the complexity of this phenomenon, we approached the topic by developing a series of matched cohort studies, each attempting to isolate a single implant design variable, while controlling for confounding factors to the extent possible. We also developed a validated method for measuring material loss in retrieved orthopaedic tapers, which contributed to the creation of a new international standard (ASTM F3129-16).

Introduction

Previous studies of retrieved CoCr alloy femoral heads have identified imprinting of the stem taper surface features onto the interior head bore, leading researchers to hypothesize that stem taper microgrooves may influence taper corrosion. However, little is known about the role of stem taper surface morphology on the magnitude of in vivo corrosion damage. We designed a matched cohort retrieval study to examine this issue.

Introduction

First-generation annealed HXLPE has been clinically successful at reducing both clinical wear rates and the incidence of osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. However, studies have observed oxidative and mechanical degradation occurring in annealed HXLPE. Thus, it is unclear whether the favorable clinical performance of 1st generation HXLPE is due to the preservation of bearing surface tribological properties or, at least partially, to the reduction in patient activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro wear performance (assessed using multidirectional pin-on-disk (POD) testing) of 1^st-generation annealed HXLPE with respect to in vivo duration, clinical wear rates, oxidation, and mechanical properties.

Background:

Previous studies regarding modular head-neck taper corrosion were largely based on cobalt chrome (CoCr) alloy femoral heads. Less is known about head-neck taper corrosion with ceramic femoral heads.

SUMMARY

We report a prospective study of clinical data collected pre, intra and post operation to remove both cup and head components of 118 failed, current generation metal on metal (MOM) hips. Whilst component position was important, the majority were unexplained failures and of these the majority (63%) had cup inclination angles of less than 55 degrees. Poor biocompatibility of the wear debris may explain many of the failures.

Introduction: The London Implant Retrieval Centre (LIRC) was founded to investigate the high incidence of unexplained failures of Metal-on-Metal (MoM) hips. A multidisciplinary team analyse the failed hips, investigations include CT and MRI scans, blood and synovial fluid tests, wear measurements, X-rays and clinical data from the explanting surgeons.

Wear measurements of 100 explanted hips have been carried out on a Taylor Hobson 365 Roundness Machine using the LIRC Wear Protocol. It was found that 50% of explanted cups were wearing less than 5 μm/year and 60% of components were wearing less than 10 μm/year. Wear tests on hip joint simulators predict wear rates between 2 and 8 μm/year. However, 6% of cups are wearing faster than 100 μm/year, with 16% of cups have wear patches deeper than 100 μm and that 4% have a wear patch deeper than 300 μm.

Discussion: This paper considers the common characteristics of components in this very high wearing category. Engineering parameters such as head/cup clearance, surface finish, form errors and head cup contact conditions are investigated. This is correlated with clinical data and other results from the LIRC.

Cup position is an important factor, all of the high wearing components are outside the Lewinick’s Box, however it is shown that mal position is does not always lead to extreme wear. Further analysis is taking place to calculate the size of the contact patch between head and cup (based on patient data and biomechanics) and the proximity of the contact patch to the edge of the cup.

Conclusion: The study of explanted components shows that 6% exhibit extreme wear, and although several “risk” factors can be identified, it is not clear why only a proportion of these components show extremely high wear rates. This is the subject of current investigation.

The Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacing arthroplasty has a failure rate of 12.0% at five years, compared with 4.3% for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR). We analysed 66 ASR and 64 BHR explanted metal-on-metal hip replacements with the aim of understanding their mechanisms of failure. We measured the linear wear rates of the acetabular and femoral components and analysed the clinical cause of failure, pre-revision blood metal ion levels and orientation of the acetabular component.

There was no significant difference in metal ion levels (chromium, p = 0.82; cobalt, p = 0.40) or head wear rate (p = 0.14) between the two groups. The ASR had a significantly increased rate of wear of the acetabular component (p = 0.03) and a significantly increased occurrence of edge loading (p < 0.005), which can be attributed to differences in design between the ASR and BHR. The effects of differences in design on the in vivo wear rates are discussed: these may provide an explanation as to why the ASR is more sensitive to suboptimal positioning than the BHR.

We measured the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 53.4 years (30 to 74) who had undergone revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Three-dimensional CT was used to measure the inclination and version of the acetabular component, femoral version and the horizontal femoral offset, and the linear wear of the removed acetabular components was measured using a roundness machine.

We found that acetabular version and combined version of the acetabular and femoral components were weakly positively correlated with the rate of wear. The acetabular inclination angle was strongly positively correlated with the rate of wear. Femoral version was weakly negatively correlated with the rate of wear. Application of a threshold of > 5 μm/year for the rate of wear in order to separate the revisions into low or high wearing groups showed that more high wearing components were implanted outside Lewinnek’s safe zone, but that this was mainly due to the inclination of the acetabular component, which was the only parameter that significantly differed between the groups.

We were unable to show that excess version of the acetabular component alone or combined with femoral version was associated with an increase in the rate of wear based on our assessment of version using CT.

This study compared component wear rates and pre-revision blood metal ions levels in two groups of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: hip resurfacing and modular total hip replacement (THR).

There was no significant difference in the median rate of linear wear between the groups for both acetabular (p = 0.4633) and femoral (p = 0.0872) components. There was also no significant difference in the median linear wear rates when failed hip resurfacing and modular THR hips of the same type (ASR and Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR)) were compared.

Unlike other studies of well-functioning hips, there was no significant difference in pre-revision blood metal ion levels between hip resurfacing and modular THR.

Edge loading was common in both groups, but more common in the resurfacing group (67%) than in the modular group (57%). However, this was not significant (p = 0.3479). We attribute this difference to retention of the neck in resurfacing of the hip, leading to impingement-type edge loading. This was supported by visual evidence of impingement on the femur.

These findings show that failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and modular THRs have similar component wear rates and are both associated with raised pre-revision blood levels of metal ions.

Data on retrieval analysis of current generation metal on metal hip replacements is scarce. Such analysis may help to reduce the incidence of failure and revision procedures. Our aim was to investigate the wear characteristics of explanted (ie failed) metal on metal (MOM) acetabular components in terms of; 1) wear rate; and 2) distribution of the wear (specifically edge loading).

30 hips were collected from 20 centres. The types of prostheses were: 15 BHR; 10 Cormet and 5 ASR. Wear of the acetabular components of the prostheses was measured using an out of roundness (Rondcom 60A) machine. We recorded the implantation and removal date of each hip.

The median linear wear rate was 7.32μm/year; this is at least 3 times greater than steady state wear rates reported for similar components worn in hip simulator studies. For 24 out of 30 cups, the greatest linear wear was recorded at the cup edge.

Failed metal-on-metal acetabular components were associated with higher than expected wear rates. The highest wear was seen closest to the cup edge in the majority of patients suggesting edge loading had occurred and probably explained the high wear rates. Accurate cup placement (to avoid edge loading) may reduce the failure of MOM hips.