The epicondylar axis of the elbow is a surface anatomical approximation of the true flexion-extension (F-E) axis used in the application of an external fixator/elbow arthroplasty. We hypothesise that the epicondylar axis coincides with the true F-E axis in terms of both angular displacement and position (ie. offset). This suggests that it can serve as a good landmark in total dynamic external fixator application and elbow arthroplasty. Three-dimensional elbow models were obtained through manual segmentation and reconstruction from 142±40 slices of CT scans per elbow in 15 cadeveric specimens. Epicondylar axis was defined to be the axis through the 2 epicondyles manually identified on the elbow models. F-E axis was defined to be the normal of a circle fitted on 20 points identified on the trochlear groove. The long axis of the elbow was identified through a line fit through the center of the distal humerus on several slices along the elbow CT. Angle between the long axis and epicondylar axis was measured. Angular deviation of the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis was calculated in reference to the long axis. All axes were projected onto the orthogonal planes on the elbow CTs and all measurements were repeated. Angular differences in the axial, saggital and coronal planes are described in internal/external rotation, flexion/extension and valgus/varus respectively. Offset in the axial and coronal planes are described in the following directions respectively: proximal/distal and anterior/posterior respectively. Comparisons between angles were performed using student's t-test.Introduction
Methods
Total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective
method of treating end-stage arthritis of the knee. It is not, however,
a procedure without risk due to a number of factors, one of which
is diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to estimate
the general prevalence of diabetes in patients about to undergo
primary TKR and to determine whether diabetes mellitus adversely
affects the outcome. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis
according to the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
(MOOSE) guidelines. The Odds Ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD)
were used to represent the estimate of risk of a specific outcome.
Our results showed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among patients
undergoing TKR was 12.2%. Patients with diabetes mellitus had an increased
risk of deep infection (OR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI),
1.38 to 1.88), deep vein thrombosis (in Asia, OR = 2.57, 95% CI,
1.58 to 4.20), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 1.89, 95% CI, 1.04
to 3.45), aseptic loosening (OR = 9.36, 95% CI, 4.63 to 18.90),
and a poorer Knee Society function subscore (MD = -5.86, 95% CI,
-10.27 to -1.46). Surgeons should advise patients specifically about
these increased risks when obtaining informed consent and be meticulous about
their peri-operative care. Cite this article:
