The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome, complications and survival of the three most commonly used surgical reconstructions of the proximal humerus in adult patients after trans-articular tumour resection. Between1985 and 2005 thirty-eight consecutive proximal humeral reconstructions using either, allograft-prosthesis composite (n=10), osteoarticular allograft (n=13) or a modular tumour prosthesis (n=14), were performed in our clinic. Their mean follow-up was ten years (nine months to 25 years). Of these, twenty-seven were disease free at latest follow-up (Mean follow-up 16.8 years) and ten had died of disease (4.2 years). Complications and implant survival with revision surgery as end-point are presented for the total group of patients, functional scores for surviving patients only. The endoprosthetic group presented the smallest complication rate of 21%, compared to 40% in the allograftprosthesis- composite and 62% in the osteoarticular allograft group. Only one revision was performed in the endoprosthetic group, in a case of shoulder instability. Infection after revision (n=3), pseudoarthrosis (n=2), fracture of the allograft (n=3), and shoulder instability (n=4) were major complications of allograft use in general. Kaplan-Meier-analysis showed a significantly better implant survival for the endoprosthetic group (log-rank p=0.002). At final follow-up the MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society scores averaged at; 72% for the allograft-prosthetic-composite (n=7, mean follow-up 19 years), 76% for the osteoarticular allograft (n=3, 16 years), and 77% for the endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=10, 6 years) groups.Method
Results
Assess the oncological and clinical outcomes associated with intralesional curettage, phenol and bone grafting of the lesions. A retrospective study was performed using data from the Leiden University Medical Center. Ninety patients with low grade central chondrosarcoma of long bones and small tubular bones were treated using phenol and ethanol as adjuvant therapy after intralesional curettage. Standard clinical follow-up contained regular visits to the orthopaedic department, physical examination and radiological follow-up with plain X-rays and dynamic Gadolineum-enhanced MRI scans.Aim
Method
To determine whether delayed diagnosis (lapse from initial symptoms to the beginning of treatment) has influence on the possibilities of crossing the physis by the tumour, and/or on the outcome in pediatric patients with high grade metaphyseal osteosarcoma. The clinical records, image methods and the histology reports of 157 metaphyseal paediatric osteosarcomas were reviewed. The mean follow-up time was 102 months. Location, histological subtype, time from initial symptoms to start of treatment, major diameter, % of necrosis, physis crossed by the tumour or not, and outcome (recurrence, metastases and status) were recorded in a SPSS v15.0 file.Aim
Patients and methods
The saddle prosthesis was originally developed for reconstruction of large acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty. Later on the saddle prosthesis was also used for hip reconstruction after resection of peri-acetabular tumours. In case of patient survival a long-term good hip function is required of the saddle prosthesis. The goal of this study is the measurement of long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after reconstruction of peri-acetabular tumours. Between 1987 and 2003 a total of 17 patients were treated in the Leiden University Medical Center with saddle prosthesis after resection of peri-acetabular tumours (12 chondrosarcoma, 3 osteosarcoma, 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 1 metastasis). 11 of the 17 patients died, the mean survival was 37 months (range 2-59 months), and 6 patients were still alive (follow-up 12.1 year, range 8.3–16.8 year). The outcome was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire, the Toronto Extrimity Salvage Score (TESS) and the Musculo Skeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score. In 1 patient the saddle prosthesis was removed already after 3 months because of luxation and infection.Aim
Method
