Background

Total ankle arthrpoplasty (TAA) was performed frequently for ankle deformity caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). TAA has some advantages over ankle arthrodesis in range of motion (ROM). However, loosening and sinking of implant have been reported with several prostheses, especially constrained designs. Recently, we have performed mobile bearing TAA and report short term results of this prosthesis followed average 3 years.

Good mid-term results of Oxford UKA (OxUNI) for anteromedial osteoarthritis (OA) were reported. The designers of prosthesis reported a 98% 10-year survival rate for a combined series of phase I and II, and these findings were supported by published results from other series, with 10-year survival ranging from 91% to 98%. In order to obtain good results, the designers of this prosthesis mentioned the importance of adhering to strict indication for OxUNI, especially only for OA cases with intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). OxUNI combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a viable treatment option for only young active patients, in whom the ACL has been primarily ruptured. On the other hand, it was not clear whether the result of OxUNI combined with ACLR for OA with secondary ruptured ACL was good. In this study we compare the short-term results of OxUNI combined with ACLR for OA with secondary ruptured ACL with that for usual OA with intact ACL.

382 OxUNI were performed at two hospitals by one surgeon between January 2002 and August 2005. Among those, 367 cases, followed over two years postoperatively (272 patients, women: 283, men: 84) were assessed. Follow up ratio was 96.1%. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 72.0 (47~93) years. The mean follow-up period was 39.3 (24~67) months. Thirty three knees of OA were treated with OxUNI combined with ACLR, by using synthetic graft. Clinical results were assessed by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and active range of motion (ROM). Patients are asked a series of 12 questions, and their response scores range from 0 (worse) to 4 (best) for each, yielding an overall score range of 0–48. All living patients were contacted, and the status of the implant was established at the time of last follow from hospital records. We evaluate the survival rate for OxUNI with or without ACLR, using the endpoint of revision for any reason.

The pre-and postoperative clinical scores were compared using the paired Student’s t-test. Survivor-ship curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survivorship between groups was compared using logrank and Wilcoxon methods. All analyses were performed using 95% confidence intervals and a P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

The mean OKS at final follow-up was 42.1 (preoperative; 21.7), and the mean active ROM was 125.2° (preoperative; 113.4°). OKS and active ROM were significantly improved. There were no significant differences in OKS and active ROM between OxUNI with ACLR and OxUNI with intact ACL. Fourteen knees among 367 knees were revised; nine for loosening of tibial component, four for dislocation of bearing and one for progression of lateral OA. Overall 5-year survival rate was 95.6%. When survival rate was assessed separately with or without ACLR, that of OxUNI with intact ACL was 96.7% and that of OxUNI with ACLR was 83.8%. There was significant worse survival rate between the two groups (P=0.0071).

The 5-year survival rate for OxUNI with intact ACL was 96.7%, which was equivalent to those of original series from Oxford. However, 5-year survival rate for Oxford UKA with ACLR was 83.8% in our series. Four knees in nine of loosening of tibial component were replaced by OxUNI combined with ACLR. Therefore, even if ACL was reconstructed, the results of OxUNI for OA with secondary ruptured ACL was proved to be pessimistic.

There was significantly worse survival rate for OxUNI with ACLR, compared with OxUNI with intact ACL. So we conclude that combined ACL reconstruction and OxUNI for anteromedial OA with secondary ruptured ACL is not recommended, which must be treated with TKA.

Aim: In alumina-on-alumina (Al/Al) THA, microsepa-ration is reported to accelerate wear and to be a risk factor of alumina cup fracture. While microseparation after THA is detected during walking, microseparation also occurs in relation to the hip position. Using Al/Al THA with cemented polyethylene-back alumina cup, the microseparation is clearly visible on plain roentgen-ograms. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that affect hip position related microseparation. Materials and Methods: We performed 65 primary Al/Al THA. An average age at operation was 61.1 years and an average follow-up period was 29.5 months. Roentgenograms were taken in hip neutral position, abduction, adduction, external rotation and internal rotation. Results: Microseparation was observed in 15 hips (23.1%); 10 hips with hip external rotation and 5 hips with hip abduction. An average abduction angle of the cup was 33.5±9.8 degrees with microseparation and 36.6±7.3 degrees without microseparation. An average anteversion of the cup was 9.7±6.7 degrees and 7.8±5.8 degrees, respectively. The factors that brought about microseparation were postoperative muscle weakness in 3 hips, impingement in 9, cup malposition (abduction angle: 19, 23 degrees) in 2, and short off-set stem in one. Discussion and Conclusions: It should be noted that microseparation is not a rare phenomenon and it occurs in hip particular position even if it can not be detected on routine roentgenograms.