To assess if there is a reproducible relationship between the width and thickness of the normal patella. 43 MRI scans of young adults, average age 27 (range 17–38) were studied. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of degenerative joint disease, patella-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (102 patients). The bony thickness of the patella, the chondral thickness and patella width were measured, as was the location of maximal patella thickness. Inter/intra observer variability was calculated and correlation analysis performed.Aim
Method
Patello-femoral arthritis can result in a considerable thinning of the patella. The restoration of an adequate patella thickness is key to the successful outcome of knee arthroplasty. The objectives were (1) to establish a reproducible patella width:thickness index including chondral surface and (2) to investigate whether there is a difference between bone alone and bone/chondral construct thickness as shown by MRI. Forty three MRI scans of young adults, mean age 27 (range 17–38), 34 male and 9 female, were studied. Exclusion criteria included degenerative joint disease, patello-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (102 patients). The bony and chondral thickness of the patella and its width were measured. Inter/intra observer variability was calculated and correlation analysis performed. We found a strong correlation between patella plus cartilage thickness and width (Pearson 0.75, P < 0.001). The mean width:thickness ratio was 1.8 (SD 0.10, 95% CI 1.77–1.83). Without cartilage the ratio was 2.16 (SD 0.15, 95% CI 2.11–2.21), correlation was moderate (Pearson 0.68, P < 0.001). The average patella cartilage thickness was 4.1mm (SD 1.1, 95% CI 3.8–4.5). The narrow confidence intervals for the ratio of patella width:thickness suggest that patella width can be used as a guide to accurate restoration of patella thickness during total knee or patella-femoral replacement. We would recommend a ratio of 1.8:1.
Pelvic and acetabular injuries are relatively rare and surgical reconstruction usually occurs only in specialist centres. As part of their work up there is a local protocol for radiological investigations including Judet oblique views for acetabular fractures, pelvic inlet and outlet for pelvic ring fractures and urethrograms for sustaining anterior pelvic injury. The aim of this service evaluation was to assess whether patients had these radiological investigations prior to transfer. The last 50 patients transferred for surgery were evaluated (41 male, 9 female), average age 48 (range 17–86). Four were excluded as original radiology not available and one due to non-acute presentation. Regional PACS systems were accessed and radiological investigations recorded.Introduction
Methods
