The majority of hip fracture patients receive operative treatment, although the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) 2012 suggest 2.6% were treated conservatively. One of only a few published reports on the outcomes of these patients has demonstrated that mortality rates beyond 30 days remain comparable to patients receiving surgery. We have assessed the outcomes of conservatively managed patients in our unit. Patients treated conservatively at our hospital between 2010 and 2012 inclusive were identified using the NHFD. Data collection included mobility status, ASA grade, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), mortality (30 days and 1 year) and pain scores. The study group (N=31) had a mean age 85, mean ASA was 4 and mean NHFS mortality risk 21.3%. Morbidity included one case of pneumonia and one infection from another source, however there were no pressure sores or VTE. Three patients later received surgery once their health had improved. Pain control was achieved in 91% patients (21/23) and although mobility decreased, 34.8% of patients were able to mobilise with either two aids or a frame. Given the selection bias for conservative treatment in unwell patients, the higher mortality figure is not unexpected. Although the 30 day mortality data is higher than the national average for operative management, those patients surviving 30 days have a mortality similar to those managed operatively. Despite mobility decreasing from the pre-admission status, a significant number of patients were pain free and could mobilise. Therefore conservative management can produce acceptable results in these patients.
Total knee replacement has been well-established form of treatment both for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. Both cemented and uncemented TKR have been used successfully. Since 1977 low contact stress (LCS) mobile bearing knee replacement has been in extensive use. Most of the intermediate and long term results reported are in osteoarthritis1–7. Though there are several studies reporting short term performance of TKR in rheumatoid arthritis8–19 there have been rare reports31 of intermediate to long-term performance of LCS uncemented TKR in rheumatoid arthritis. Retrospective, non-randomised and consecutive study. Case notes and radiological assessment done. Kaplan meyer survival analysis used. Radiological assessment between initial and final xrays done using T test statistics. Assessement done by two independent observer.Introduction
Methods
We present a retrospective study of comparision between two types of aritifical boen graft substitues. There is an overwhelming marketting drive on part of companies to sell alternative bone grafts/BMP. We in this study compae two such producsts and their cost effectiveness This is an interventional, retrospective, non consecutive, non randamised case series study of 27 patients. Type I bone graft is Mini MIIG which is surgical grade calciun sulphate which is osteoconductive. Type II bone graft is Allomatrix which conatins bone marrow aspirate, bone morphogenic protein, concellous bone chips and surgical grade calciun sulphate which is osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive. In this study 14 cases were treated with Mini MIIG and 18 with Allomatrix. There were 24 primary fractures with bone defect, 2 non union and 1 delayed union. Complete bony union were seen in all 27 patients. Average time to heal since bone grafting is 3 months. Complications are extrubent callus formation, bone formatiom in soft tissue, but no patient required secondary procedure to trim the bone. Cost for Allomatrix is £ 356.00 and Mini MIIG is £348.00. Use of such artificial bone grafting avoids the complication of autografting which includes bone graft side morbidity like pain, bleeding and neurvascular damage. For fresh fractures useage of such artificial bone grafts doesnt shorten the healing time, doesnt prevent collapse at fracture site and it is not cost effective. For non union and delyaed unions it avoids the cost for artifical bone grafting. But autograft also incurs the cost of removing, theatre timing. human resources cost and hospital inpatient costs. There is no difference between one type of bone graft over the other and for fresh fracture both of them has no advantage over using no bone grafts. Our study concludes artifical bone graft is of no advantage for fresh fractures and for non union and delayed unions it is too small a number to come to any conclusion.
