The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of acetabular fractures treated in our institution with marginal impaction. Over a 5 year period consecutive acetabular cases treated in our institution with marginal impaction were eligible for inclusion in this study. Exclusion criteria were patients lost to follow up and pathological fractures. A retrospective analysis of prospectively documented data was performed. Demographics, fracture types according to the Judet-Letournel classification, radiological criteria of intra-operative reduction (Matta) and secondary collapse, complication rates, and the EuroQol-5D questionnaire were documented over a median period of follow-up of 40 months (12–206). Out of 400 cases, eighty-eight acetabular fractures met the inclusion criteria. The majority (93.2%) involved males with a median age of 40.5 years (16–80). Half of them were posterior-wall fractures, 21.6% bicolumn, 14.7 %posterior-wall and column, 6.8% transverse, 5.7% anterior-column, 1.1% anterior-column posterior hemi-transverse. In 75% of the cases anatomical intra-operative reduction was achieved. Structural-bone-graft was used in 73.9%, and two-level reconstruction in 61%. At the last follow-up, the originally achieved anatomical reduction was lost in 17/66 (25.8%), (10 PW, 4 PC+PW, 1 PC, 1 Transverse, 1 Bicolumn fracture). Avascular necrosis developed in 9.1% and heterotopic ossification in 19.3%. Full return to previous activities was documented in 48.9% of cases, the EuroQol general heath state score had a median of 80% (30–95%), full recovery was recorded as to the patients’ mobility in 51.1%, as to pain in 47.7%, as to self-care in 70.5%, as to work-related activities in 55.7%, and as to emotional parameters in 65.9%. Reoperation (heterotopic-ossification excision, total-hip-arthroplasty, removal of metalwork) was necessary in 19.2% of cases. Utilising different techniques of elevation of the articular joint impaction leads to joint preservation with satisfactory overall functional results. Secondary collapse was noted in 25.8% of the patients predisposing to a poorer outcome
Anterior wall and/or column acetabular fractures (AW/ C) have a low incidence rate. Paucity of information exists regarding the clinical results of these fractures. We present our experience in treating AW/C at a tertiary referral centre. Between Jan-2002 and Dec-2007, 200 consecutive patients were treated in our institution with displaced acetabular fractures. All AW/C fractures according to the Letournel classification were included in the study. All patients underwent plain radiography and CT investigations. Retrospective analysis of the medical notes and radiographs was performed for type of associated injuries, operative technique, peri-operative complications. Radiological assessment of fracture healing was determined by Matta’s criteria and functional hip scores were assessed using Merle-d’-Aubigne scoring. The mean follow up was 44.5 months (28–64). 15 patients (10 males) met the inclusion criteria (mean age 55.5 years). Four had associated anterior dislocation. Associated injuries included pneumothorax, splenic rupture, tibial and distal radius fractures. Five were treated by percutaneous methods, 8 with plate-screw fixation, and 2 with circlage wire, (10 ilioinguinal approaches). Mean time-to-surgery was 14 days(10–21 days). The average operative time for the percutaneous group was 75min vs. 190min in the orif group. Mean postoperative-in-patient-stay was 4 days(3–7 days), and 21 days(14–37 days). One patient developed chest infection post-operatively, two loss of sensation over the distribution of lateral cutaneous nerve. None of them developed incisional hernia, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. At the last follow-up radiological outcome was excellent in 11 and good in 4 patients; clinical outcome was excellent in 12 and good in 3 patients, and none of the patients has developed heterotopic calcification or early osteoarthritis. Our results on management of these fractures are comparable to the early results reported by Letournel. Operative treatment for the rare anterior wall and anterior column fractures yields a favourable outcome resulting in early mobilization with limited patient morbidity
To estimate the prevalence of clavicular fractures, number of cases required operative treatment, and whether removal of the implant is a frequent necessity. Between November 2005 and Nov 2007 all patients presenting in our institution with clavicular fractures were eligible for participation. Patients below 18 years of age, and pathological fractures were excluded. Retrospective review of clinical notes and radiographs. Demographic details, mode of injury, treatment protocol, operative procedures performed, time to union, complications post-surgery stabilization, and the number of cases that required implant removal were documented and analysed in a computerized database. The mean time of follow up was 24 weeks (12–48). Out of 16,280 adult fractures that presented to our institution, 200 (1.23%), (137 males) patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 43 years (19–95) and a mean ISS of 9 (4–38). There were 4 of the medial, 153 of the middle and 43 of the lateral clavicle fractures (3 were open). 178 (89%) patients were treated non-operatively and 22 (11%) operatively. Indications for surgery included open fracture, bony spike/skin threatened, grossly displaced/comminuted fracture, polytrauma and non-union. Mean time to radiological union was 14 weeks (5–38 weeks). Out of the 200 patients 12 (6%) developed non-union. Out of the 22 operated patients, 7 (32%) required plate removal and 1 had screw removal. Indications for removal of implant included, periprosthetic fracture (1), prominent metal work through skin (3), pain in shoulder (2), pressure symptoms (1). Post removal of implant, 6 (75%) patients claimed improvement in symptoms. Functional outcome was excellent/good in 90% of cases. The incidence of clavicular fractures was 1.23%. A small number of patients (11%) required operative treatment out of which one third had metal work removal. The majority of clavicular fractures can be treated non-operative with good functional results.
The main complications were 13 nonunions, 40 super-þcial pin infection, 2 malunions, 2 osteomyelitis, 2 patients with fat embolism syndrome and 3 deaths due to pulmonary embolism.
The surgical treatment of scaphoid nonunion is controversial. The purpose of this study is to present our experience from the surgical treatment of 16 scaphoid nonunions in heavy manual workers. Sixteen patients with sixteen nonunions of the scaphoid were treated during the last 6 years (13 male and 3 female). Established nonunion was present in 7 months to 7 years. Five nonunions were Alnot stage I, 5 were IIa, 5 were IIb and 1 nonunion was stage IIIa. One case considered the distal pole and 15 the proximal pole of the scaphoid. In 5 patients there was avascular necrosis of the scaphoid and in 6 patients DISI was present. All sixteen patients complained about pain, resulting to disability to work. All patients were treated with an autocompression screw and small autologus cancellus bone grafts. In one case with a proximal third non-union, screw fixation was not achieved. The mean time of union was 70 days. Mean follow up was 3 years. All patients returned early to their occupation without pain. Grip strength reached 90% (70% preoperatively) and range of motion reached 95% (80% preoperatively), compared to the contralateral side. Excellent functional results were in eleven patients, good in four and average in one patient. In four cases there was a previous carpal dislocation. Symptoms of non-union of the scaphoid appear earlier in heavy manual workers and their surgical treatment should not be delayed. We believe that the use of autocompression screws and cancellous bone grafts is the first choice of treatment for nonunions (Alnot stage I and II) of middle and distal third of the scaphoid.