Septic arthritis is an acute infective presentation of the joint calling for urgent intervention, thus making the differential diagnosis process difficult. An increase in temperature in the area containing the suspected septic arthritis is one of the clinically important findings. In this study, it was aimed to investigate whether or not the temperature changes obtained through thermal camera can be used as a new additional diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of septic arthritis. The study was approved by the local ethics committee as a prospective cohort. A total of 49 patients, 15 septic and 34 non-septic ones, both male and female ones from all ages admitted to the emergency room or evaluated with the consultation of another clinics who were also present with a pre-diagnosis of arthritis (septic or non-septic) in the knee (with complaints of redness, swelling, pain, effusion, increased temperature, edema, and inability to walk) were included in the study. The patients with non-joint inflammatory problems and a history of surgery in the same joint were excluded from the study. The temperature increase in the joint area with suspected septic arthritis was observed, and the difference in temperature changes of this suspicious area with the joint area of the contralateral extremity was compared after which the diagnosis of septic arthritis was confirmed by taking culture with routine intra-articular fluid aspiration, which is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis.Introduction and Objective
Materials and Methods
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is a substance that requires repeated application due to its effectiveness being lost 12–16 weeks post application. Performing these intra-muscular injections under anesthesia reduces pain and distress during applications, ensuring effective and successful functional results. This study evaluates motor development of patients undergoing 3 or more repeated BoNT-A application in a tertiary pediatric hospital and the safety as well as effect of 3 different types of anesthesia. 75 children with cerebral palsy who underwent BoNT-A application at least three times consecutively with 6-month intervals and a total of 320 procedures admitted between January 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively examined. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was employed in motor development evaluation. To observe the improvement in motor development, those with 2-1-0 level decreases in GMFCS classes were grouped and compared in terms of birth time, birth weight, cerebral palsy type and first BoNT-A application age. The 3 types of anesthesia methods (sedation analgesia, larengeal mask anesthesia (LMA) and inhalation mask anesthesia) applied during the procedures were compared in terms of sedation, procedure, recovery and total operation room time. The mean age of the children for all procedures was 45.51 ± 22.40 months. As a result of procedures, significant motor development was observed in 60 (80%) patients (p <0,000∗). No significant difference was observed when the children with cerebral palsy whose GMFCS declined in the form of level 2, 1 and unchanged were compared in terms of first application age, birth weight and gestational age. It was found that 106 (33.1%) were applied sevoflurane with anesthesia mask, 103 (32.1%) were administered sevoflurane with laryngeal mask, and 111 (34.6%) were sedation-analgesia. Only 10 out of 320 procedures were seen to develop side effects (8 vomiting, 2 bronchospasm). In the patients who underwent sedation analgesia during the first 3 BoNT-A procedures, the duration of recovery and total operating room time was seen to be significantly shorter than the others, while there was no difference between the anesthesia methods in the 4th and subsequent procedures. Regardless of the type of anesthesia, the recovery and total operating room times of those having undergone 6 or more procedures were longer than those with less than 6 procedures (p <0.009, p <0.016, respectively). As conclusion, repeated BoNT-A applications in children with CP provides progress in motor steps, it can be applied safely and effectively under anesthesia. Sedation analgesia application provides easier recovery compared to general anesthesia with LMA and mask only in the first three applications. However, recovery time increases with 4 and more repeated applications as the number of applications increases.
