Purpose: While it is generally accepted that the results of revision total knee replacement (TKR) are inferior to those of primary TKR, there is little published information documenting this. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported functional outcomes following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty patients using standardized, validated outcome metrics.

Method: Using data from an academic arthroplasty database, we undertook a review of health related quality of life (SF-12) and disease specific measures (WOMAC) of patients undergoing either primary or revision TKR. The sample included 39 patients who had undergone revision TKR for reasons other than infection, and 39 patients who had undergone primary TKR matched by gender, age, modified Charnley classification, and number of years of follow-up. Student’s t-test was used to compare both groups. Average length of follow up was 2 years.

Results: The mean age was 65 years. Sixty percent (67%) of the patients were female.

Despite being matched by age, gender and modified Charnley classification, there were significant differences in post-operative functional scores. The revision TKR group’s mean WOMAC score was 73 (SD 17), compared to the primary group’s mean score of 84 (SD 14), p=0.002. Similarly, the revision group’s mean SF-12 PCS score was 35 (SD 8) compared to the primary group’s superior score of 44 (SD 10), p< 0.0001. There was no differences detected in post-operative SF-12 mental component scores; 49 (SD 12) for the revision group compared to 53 (SD 10) for the primary group, p=0.11.

Conclusion: This study confirms the general clinical impression that the functional results of revision TKR are inferior to primary TKR, as measured by both the WOMAC and SF-12 tools.