It is undetermined which factors predict return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We aimed to identify which factors predicted return to work at any level, and return to pre-injury levels of work 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Multiple logistic regression analysis of prospectively collected demographic, pre-injury, preoperative, and intraoperative data from 1502 consecutive primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon, was performed to identify independent predictors of return to work, and return to pre-injury levels of work respectively, 6 months post-surgery. Six months post-rotator cuff repair, 76% of patients returned to work (RTW), and 40% returned to pre-injury levels of work (Full-RTW). RTW at 6 months was likely if patients were still working after their injuries, but prior to surgery (Wald statistic [W]=55, p<0.0001), were stronger in internal rotation preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), had full-thickness tears (W=9, p=0.002), and were female (W=5, p=0.030). Patients who achieved Full-RTW were likely to have worked less strenuously pre-injury (W=173, p<0.0001), worked more strenuously post-injury but pre-surgery (W=22, p<0.0001), had greater behind-the-back lift-off strength preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), and had less passive external rotation range of motion preoperatively (W=5, p=0.034). Patients who were still working post-injury, but pre-surgery were 1.6-times more likely to RTW than patients who were not (p<0.0001). Patients who nominated their pre-injury level of work as “light” were 11-times more likely to achieve Full-RTW than those who nominated “strenuous” (p<0.0001). Six months post-rotator cuff repair, a higher patient-rated post-injury, but pre-surgery level of work was the strongest predictor of RTW. A lower patient-rated pre-injury level of work was the strongest predictor of Full-RTW. Greater preoperative subscapularis strength independently predicted both RTW, and Full-RTW.
Many studies have found associations between laboratory biomarkers and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but it remains unclear whether these biomarkers are clinically useful in ruling out PJI. This meta-analysis compared the performance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) versus procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of PJI. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated IL-6 or/and PCT as a diagnostic biomarker for PJI and provided sufficient data to permit sensitivity and specificity analyses for each test. The major databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through February 28, 2017. No restrictions were placed on language of publication.Purpose
Materials and Methods
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a painful and disabling condition, which most commonly involves the hips of young patients. But despite of the high incidence, treatment is still has not been definitely identified. We performed a modified muscle pedicle bone graft (MPBG) technique using anterior one-third of gluteus medius (GM) attached to the greater trochanter (GT) in ONFH. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our technique on ONFH in ARCO stage II and III patients. Between June 2007 and March 2015, 24 hips were treated by our technique, who were able to follow up at least 2 years. The group was consisted of 15 men and 8 women, mean age of 36 years at the time of surgery. Mean follow-up was 5 years. Twenty of 24 hips hips had no progression of necrotic lesions. The postoperative scintigrams showed increased blood flow in the 3 month follow up evaluation. But 4 hips underwent THA at the mean follow-up of 6 years after the surgery, and considered as “failure”. Excluding the 4 failed cases, the mean Harris hip score was improved from 54 points to 85 points at the last follow up. Through our new technique, we showed 83% of survival rate by average of 5 year follow up. And compared to other reports, our technique showed relatively good survival rate and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we suggest this modified technique as one of promising treatment of choices for young patients with ARCO stage II or III ONFH.
This meta-analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) versus topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating the need for allogenic blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative complications, volume of postoperative blood loss, and change in hemoglobin levels. Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they assessed the allogenic blood transfusion rate, postoperative complications including pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), volume of postoperative blood loss via drainage, estimated blood loss, total blood loss, and change in hemoglobin before and after surgery in primary TKA with TXA administered through both the intravenous (IV) and topical routes.[Fig. 1]Purpose
Materials and Methods
To promote rapid bone healing, an adequate stable fixation implant with a percutaneous reduction instrument should be used for Vancouver type B1 or C fractures. The objective of this study was to describe radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with periprosthetic fracture (PPF) around a stable femoral stem, treated with a distal femoral locking plate alone or with a cerclage cable. A total of 21 patients with PPF amenable to either a reverse distal femoral locking plate (LCP DF®) alone or with a cerclage cable, with a mean age of 75.7 years, were included. In these patients, 10 fractures were treated with a reverse LCP DF® alone and were classified as group I, and 11 additionally received a cerclage cable and were classified as group II.[Fig.1]Purpose
Materials and Methods
A matched comparison was made between femoral neck-preserving short, tapered stems (n = 50) and conventional length femoral stems (n = 50) in cementless total hip arthroplasty between January 2008 and January 2012. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, height, surgical approach, and surgeon. In group A, mean preoperative HHS and WOMAC scores of 55.0 and 53.0, respectively, improved to mean postoperative scores of 98.6 and 3.3, respectively, at an average follow–up of 37.2 months. In group B, mean preoperative HHS and WOMAC scores of 53.0 and 49.5, respectively, improved to mean postoperative scores 97.8 and 4.4, respectively, at an average follow–up of 35.3 months. In addition, no significant differences in mean postoperative HHS (
We prospectively analyzed 83 patients who underwent ceramic-on-ceramic THA using preassembled (n = 22) or modular acetabular components (n = 61) between June 2010 and June 2012. No radiographic evidence of progressive radiolucency, osteolytic lesions, acetabular fractures, or component migration was detected in either group. Furthermore, no patient required revision surgery for instability or ceramic breakage. Table 1 shows the mean postoperative HHS, WOMAC score, and acetabular component inclination and anteversion in groups A and B. No significant differences in mean postoperative HHS (P < 0.056), WOMAC score (P < 0.258), acetabular component inclination (P < 0.827), or anteversion (P < 0.549) were observed between the two groups according to the independent sample t-test. However, the chi-square (Fisher's exact) test showed a significant difference between the two groups with respect to the gender of the patients (P < 0.001, Table 2). These findings indicate that half of the women had smaller acetabular diameters accommodating a cup size of only 48–50-mm. Thus a preassembled ceramic liner is a very good option for women with a small acetabulum, which could permit the use of a larger femoral head (36-mm) with thin-walled acetabular components. In contrast, the component-specific complications between the two groups were quite similar. One patient (group B) had transient squeaking that disappeared after a few months. One patient (group B) had a mild limp caused by abductor muscle weakness, and one patient (group B) had a superficial wound infection that was treated with local debridement and antibiotics. Early dislocation (P < 0.488) occurred in three patients (one in group A and two in group B). Two patients (one in group A and one in group B) reported postoperative falling events at their bedside. The other in group B was a female with rheumatoid arthritis, which can lead to a much higher risk of dislocation due to soft tissue laxity around the hip joint. All of these patients were treated by closed reduction without further incident. Three patients (one in group A and two in group B) had mild iliopsoas pain (P < 0.488) that was not associated with loosening; however, the pain did not limit their activities (Table 3). In conclusion, we found no significant differences in the mean postoperative radiographic or functional outcomes or complications between the two groups, showing satisfactory performance at the 2 year follow up. Only the gender of the patient was significantly different between the two goups, demonstrating that a larger number of women had smaller acetabular diameters accommodating a cup size of only 48–50-mm. Although a preassembled cup with a 36-mm ceramic liner has proven safety in the short term, future research should focus on its long-term risks.
We evaluated radiological hip remodelling after shelf acetabuloplasty and sought to identify prognostic factors in 25 patients with a mean age of 8.9 years (7.0 to 12.3) who had unilateral Perthes’ disease with reducible subluxation of the hip in the fragmentation stage. At a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (3.2 to 9.0), satisfactory remodelling was observed in 18 hips (72%). The type of labrum in hip abduction, as determined by intra-operative dynamic arthrography, was found to be a statistically significant prognostic factor (p = 0.012). Shelf acetabuloplasty as containment surgery seems to be best indicated for hips in which there is not marked collapse of the epiphysis and in which the extruded epiphyseal segment slips easily underneath the labrum on abduction, without imposing undue pressure on the lateral edge of the acetabulum.