The optimal bearing surface design for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) UKAs from a single high-volume institution. Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all primary cemented medial UKAs performed by seven surgeons from January 2006 to December 2022. A total of 2,999 UKAs were identified, including 2,315 FB and 684 MB cases. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and cumulative complications, reoperations, component revisions, conversion arthroplasties, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures. Overall mean age at surgery was 65.7 years (32.9 to 94.3), 53.1% (1,593/2,999) of UKAs were implanted in female patients, and demographics between groups were similar (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up for all UKAs was 3.7 years (0.0 to 15.6).Aims
Methods
The purpose of this multicenter, randomized clinical trial was to determine the optimal dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) to minimize perioperative blood loss for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Six centers prospectively randomized 155 revisions to one of four regimens: 1g of intravenous (IV) TXA prior to incision, a double dose regimen of 1g IV TXA prior to incision and 1g IV TXA during wound closure, a combination of 1g IV TXA prior to incision and 1g intraoperative topical TXA, or three doses of 1950mg oral TXA administered 2 hours preoperatively, 6 hours postoperatively, and on the morning of postoperative day one. Randomization was based upon revision subgroups to ensure equivalent group distribution, including: femur only, acetabulum only, both component, explant/spacer, and second stage reimplantation. Patients undergoing an isolated modular exchange were excluded. An Background
Methods
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is proven to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there are limited data on the impact of similar dosing regimens in revision TKA. The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to determine the optimal regimen to maximize the blood-sparing properties of TXA in revision TKA. From six-centres, 233 revision TKAs were randomized to one of four regimens: 1 g of intravenous (IV) TXA given prior to the skin incision, a double-dose regimen of 1 g IV TXA given both prior to skin incision and at time of wound closure, a combination of 1 g IV TXA given prior to skin incision and 1 g of intraoperative topical TXA, or three doses of 1950 mg oral TXA given two hours preoperatively, six hours postoperatively, and on the morning of postoperative day one. Randomization was performed based on the type of revision procedure to ensure equivalent distribution among groups. Power analysis determined that 40 patients per group were necessary to identify a 1 g/dl difference in the reduction of haemoglobin postoperatively between groups with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.80. Per-protocol analysis involved regression analysis and two one-sided Aims
Patients and Methods
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is proven to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there are limited data on the impact of similar dosing regimens in revision TKA that is associated with greater blood loss. The purpose of this multi-center randomized trial was to determine the optimal regimen to maximize the blood-sparing properties of TXA in revision TKA. 233 Septic and aseptic revision TKA from six-centers were randomized to either receive 1g pre-incision intravenous (IV) TXA, 1g pre- and post-incision IV TXA, 1g pre-incision IV and 1g intra-operative topical TXA, or three doses of 1950mg oral TXA given 2 hours pre-operatively, 6 hours post-operatively, and the morning of postoperative day 1. Randomization was performed based on type of revision to ensure equivalent distribution among groups. The primary outcome was reduction in hemoglobin. Power analysis determined 40 patients per group were necessary to identify a 1g/dL difference with an alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.80. Per-protocol analysis involved regression analysis and two one-sided t-tests for equivalence.Introduction
Methods
