Cementless short stems have the advantages of easy insertion, reduced thigh pain and being suitable for minimally-invasive surgery, therefore cementless short stem implants have been becoming more widely used. The revelation microMAX stem is a cementless short stem with a lateral flare design that allows for proximal physiological load transmission and more stable initial fixation. Images acquired with T-smart tomosynthesis using a new image reconstruction algorithm offer reduced artifacts near metal objects and clearer visualization of peri-implant trabeculae. Therefore, these images are useful for confirming implant fixation status after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We believe that T-smart tomosynthesis is useful for estimating the condition of microMAX stem fixation and will hereby report on observation of the postoperative course of microMAX stem. Subjects comprised 19 patients (20 hips) who underwent THA using micro MAXstem between July 2012 and November 2014 (males: 7, females: 12, mean age: 67 years, ranging from 38 to 83 years). Four patients had femoral head necrosis and 15 patients had osteoarthritis of the hip. All patients continuously underwent anterior-posterior and lateral view X-ray examination and an anterior-posterior T-smart tomosynthesis scan after the operations.Background
Materials and Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful and beneficial treatments for osteoarthritic knees. We have developed posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prosthesis for Asian patients, especially Japanese patients, and have used it since November, 2010. The component was designed based on the CT images of osteoarthritic knees, aiming to achieve deep flexion and stability. The purpose of this study was to analyze We analyzed a total of 28 knees implanted with PS TKAs: Fourteen knees with the new PS prosthesis (group A), and the other fourteen knees with a popular PS prosthesis as a control group (group B). Preoperative data of both groups were not significantly difference. Flat-panel radiographic knee images were recorded during five static knee postures including full extension standing, lunge at 90° and maximum flexion, and kneeling at 90° and maximum flexion. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the implant components were determined using model-based shape matching techniques. The results of this shape-matching process have standard errors of approximately 0.5° to 1.0° for rotations and 0.5 to 1.0 mm for translations in the sagittal plane. Unpaired t-tests were used for statistical analysis and probability values less than 0.05 were considered significant.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Adjusting joint gaps and establishing mediolateral (ML) soft tissue balance are considered essential interventions for better outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the relationship between intraoperative laxity measurements and weight-bearing knee kinematics has not been well explored. The goal of this study was to establish how intraoperative joint gaps and ML soft tissue balance affect postoperative kinematics in posterior-stabilized (PS)-TKA. We investigated 44 knees with 34 patients who underwent primary PS-TKA. Subjects averaged 71 ± 7 years at the time of surgery, included 8 male and 36 female knees with a preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis in 38 knees and rheumatoid arthritis in 6 knees. A single surgeon performed all the surgeries with mini-midvastus approach. After independent bone cutting, soft tissues were released on a case-by-case basis to obtain ML balance. The femoral trial and a tensor were put in place, and the patella was reduced to the original position. A joint distraction force of 40 lb was applied by the tensor, and the central joint gaps and ML tilting angles were measured at 0°, 10°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120° and 135° flexion (Fig. 1). We defined a “gap difference” as a gap size difference between one gap and another, which represents the gap change between the two knee flexion positions. ML soft tissue balance was assessed by measuring the mean joint gap tilting angle over all flexion angles for each patient. Based on the tilting angle, the 44 knees were classified into three groups: The knees with the mean joint gap tilting of less than −1.0° (13 knees), between −1.0 and 1.0° (14 knees), and over 1.0° (17 knees). At least 1.5 year after surgery, a series of dynamic squat radiographs and 3 static lateral radiographs of straight-leg standing, lunge at maximum flexion, and kneeling at maximum flexion, were taken for each patient. The 3-dimensional position and orientation of the implant components were determined using model-based shape matching techniques (Fig. 2). Correlations between intraoperative measurements and knee kinematics were analyzed. The knee kinematics was also compared among three tilting groups.Introduction:
Methods:
