Aims

This is a multicentre, prospective assessment of a proportion of the overall orthopaedic trauma caseload of the UK. It investigates theatre capacity, cancellations, and time to surgery in a group of hospitals that is representative of the wider population. It identifies barriers to effective practice and will inform system improvements.

Aims

The International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (ICM, Philadelphia 2018) recommended histology as one of the diagnostic tests although this is not routinely used in a number of UK hospitals. This study aims to explore the role of histology in the diagnosis of infection and whether it is of practical use in those cases where the microbiology samples are either diagnostically unclear or do not correspond to the pre-operative diagnosis or the clinical picture.

Objective evaluations of resident performance can be difficult to simulate. A novel competency based surgical OSCE was developed to evaluate surgical skill. The goal of this study was to test the construct validity comparing previously validated Ottawa scores (O-scores) and Orthopaedic in-training evaluation scores (OITE).

An OSCE designed to simulate typical general orthopaedic surgical cases was developed to evaluate resident surgical performance. Post-graduate year (PGY) 3–5 trainees have an encounter (interview and physical exam) with a standardized patient and perform a correlating surgery on a cadaver. Examiners evaluate all components of the treatment plan and provide an overall score on the OSCE and also provide an O-score on overall surgical performance. Convergent and divergent validity was assessed comparing OSCE scores to O-scores and OITE scores. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. ANOVA was used to compare PGY averages and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare OSCE versus O-score and OITE scores.

A total of 96 simulated surgical cases were evaluated over a 3 year period for 24 trainees. There was a significant difference in OSCE scores based on year of training. (PGY3 − 6.06/15, PGY4 − 8.16/15 and PGY5 − 11.14/15, p < 0 .001). OSCE and O-scores demonstrated a strong positive correlation of +0.89 while OSCE and OITE scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation of 0.68.

OSCE scores demonstrated strong convergent and moderate divergent correlation. A positive trajectory based on level of training and stronger correlations with established, validated scores supports the construct validity of the novel surgical OSCE.

Bone and joint infections of the lower limbs cause significant morbidity for patients. Infection is a devastating complication for prosthetic joint replacements. In this large case series from a single centre in the NE of England, we present our experience of using antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 for local elution of antibiotics at the site of infection.

At our centre, from August 2012 to Jan 2015, antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 was used for local elution of antibiotics in 45 patients with lower limb bone or joint infections. Tailored plans were made by Orthopedic surgeon and Microbiologist MDTs based on bacteria and sensitivities.

Cases included 20 THR, 13 TKR, 5 Hemiarthroplasties, 4 tibial nonunions, 1 infected femoral plate and 2 paediatric osteomyelitis.

Organisms isolated – Coagulase negative Staphs, Staph aureus, MRSA, E coli, Enterococcus, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia and 1 Salmonella typhimurium!!

In our cases, a combination of Vancomycin and Gentamicin was added to Stimulan beads following manufacturer's mixing guide. In 2 cases, we added Ceftazidime to the beads and Daptomycin in 1 case.

In bone infections, surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics were also needed. All arthroplasty infections underwent explantation with addition of antibiotic impregnated beads either at single stage or both stages of 2 stage revisions and systemic antibiotics.

Follow up (ranging 9months to 2 years) indicates no failure so far. The beads caused no excessive wound drainage. There was no need to remove beads as they dissolve. In the cases where a staged revision was performed, the beads were inserted at first stage and there was microbiological clearance of infection at 2nd stage. Our series includes some experince in paediatric cases too.

As far as we are aware, this is the largest series in the UK from a single centre reporting experience with Stimulan in infected bone and joints of the lower limbs. Our experience suggests use of dissolvable pure Calcium sulphate beads impregnated with carefully selected antibiotics, works as an effective adjunct to current treatments and offers flexibility with choice of antiobiotics that can be added locally.

Objective

To evaluate the volume of cases, causes of failure, complications in patients with a failed Thompson hemiarthroplasty.

AIM

When a hip is replaced using a posterior surgical approach, some of the external rotator muscles are divided. The aim of this study was to assess if this surgery has a long term affect on hip rotation during activities of daily living.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare hip movement between normal subjects and patients with a large Metal on Metal hip replacement, undertaking the task of retrieving an object from the floor.

Methods: An electromagnetic tracker was used to measure movement as subjects retrieved an object with flexed hips and straight knees. Measurements were taken from a control group of 10 subjects with bilaterally normal hips, and 10 subjects with unilateral hip replacement. Sensors were attached over the iliac crest and the mid-shaft of the lateral thigh. Data was collected as each subject repeated the movement 3 times. The tracker recorded data at 10 hertz, with an accuracy of 0.15 degree.

Results: For the normal group the mean hip flexion was 90.8 degrees (SD 20.1). For the arthroplasty group the mean flexion on the normal and operated sides were 74.0 (SD 21) and 72.7 degrees (SD 21) respectively. This was not significant (P= 0.83). However there was a significant difference in hip movement between the operated hips and those in the normal control group (P= 0.03).

For the bilaterally normal group the mean hip rotation was 2.9 degrees internal (SD 11.8). For the arthroplasty group the mean rotation on the normal and operated sides were 9.4 degrees external (SD 9.5) and 6.9 degrees internal (SD 13.9) respectively. In this group there was a significant difference between the normal and operated side (P= 0.02).

Discussion: This study has shown that patients with a unilateral hip replacement have no significant flexion difference between hips, when retrieving an object from the floor. However there was a significant difference compared to a control group with normal hips. A significant difference was also observed when comparing the rotation of an operated hip joint to the contra-lateral normal hip in the same individual.

Introduction: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty are advised to minimise their hip flexion in the early postoperative phase, to reduce the risk of dislocation. One activity that requires hip flexion is picking an object up from the floor. The aim of this study was to investigate the amount of hip flexion required to perform this task, and to see if there is a difference between patients with small and large bearing total hip replacements.

Methods: Nineteen unilateral total hip replacement patients were recruited into the study. Nine had a small bearing (metal on plastic) implant and ten had a large bearing (metal on metal) implant. Each patient had a contra-lateral normal native hip, which provided a control for bilateral comparison.

An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure the flexion in the operated and normal hip of each patient. Tracker sensors were placed on the iliac crest and the mid-lateral thigh. The patients were then asked to flex forward from a standing position to pick an object up off the floor. This movement was repeated 3 times. Flexion data was collected at 10Hz which was accurate to 0.15 degrees. Spinal flexion was not recorded during the task.

Patients were also asked to complete the Harris and Oxford Hip Score questionnaires to obtain qualitative data regarding their hip replacement.

Results: The mean peak flexion angles (degrees) for each group are given below:

Small bearing group:

Operated side: Peak flexion = 79.3

Comparing the small bearing group with the large bearing group, the peak difference was 6.6. This difference was non-significant with P = 0.43.

All patients reported good – excellent functional results when completing the Harris and Oxford Hip Scores.

Discussion: The investigation showed that picking an object up from the floor requires a peak hip flexion of approximately 80 degrees. This investigation found no significant difference between the normal and operated sides. This would suggest that a Total Hip Replacement restores the “normal” range of motion in a hip joint. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the small and large bearing hip implants.

While hidden blood loss has been shown to occur in hip fractures the timing and cause have not yet been demonstrated. This study investigated the degree of pre-operative blood loss within the first 24hrs after intertrochanteric hip fracture.

188 patients with extracapsular hip fractures had their full blood count taken on admission and after 24 hours. The haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct) were noted at each time. Fractures were grouped as undisplaced or displaced. Those who were operated on prior to the 24hr blood sample were excluded. All patients with intracapsular or sub-trochanteric fractures were excluded, as were any who received a blood transfusion prior to their 24hr blood sample being taken. The tests for differences between blood samples and the existence of displacement were performed using paired and independent Student’s t-test. The level of significance was set at P< 0.05. All data was analysed using SPSS statistical software version 11.

The overall fall in the Hb within 24hr was significant (1.6 g/dl, P< 0.001), as was the fall in the haematocrit (0.05, P< 0.05). Displaced fractures had a significantly lower Hb at 24hrs than undisplaced (10.6g/dl vs 11.8 g/dl, P=0.001). The fall in Hb was significantly greater in displaced fractures compared to undisplaced (1.7g/dl vs 1.2g/dl, P< 0.05). Changes in the Hct mirrored those of the Hb.

This study identified a significant blood loss that occurs within the first 24hrs after an intertrochanteric hip fracture, prior to theatre. The cause is unlikely to be secondary to dehydration as the Hct fell with the Hb. Thus the most likely cause is the trauma itself. The admission Hb is possibly an inaccurate measure of the true value and patients may be more shocked than first thought. A more liberal resuscitation policy may be warranted.

Background: Mini-incision surgery (MIS) for total hip replacement (THR) typically uses incisions of 10cm or less and therefore may offer a better cosmetic appearance. Reported advantages of MIS include decreased blood loss, less tissue trauma and decreased pain, all of which are equivocal by six weeks post-surgery, when compared with standard incisions. The aim of this study was to compare patient scar satisfaction and identify potential long-term benefits of this incision when used in the posterior approach for THR.

Methods: Two groups of patients who underwent primary THR were reviewed. Group 1 consisted of 43 patients who underwent THR via a mini-incision, with a mean incision length of 9.44cm. Group 2 consisted of 51 patients who had a posterior standard incision, with a mean length of 15.3cm. The average length of follow-up was 12.8 months (range 2 – 48 months). There were no wound complications in either group. Scars were assessed using the validated Manchester Scar Proforma (MSP) and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), and patients completed a Patient Scar Assessment Scale.

Results: The mean combined MSP and VAS scores for Group 1 and Group 2 were 7.2 and 7.1 respectively. The mean Patient Scar Assessment Scale score was 8.8 in group 1, and 10.4 in Group 2. The single parameter that scored highest in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale was the colour of the scar. This did not vary between the two groups of patients. There was no statistical significance in any of the parameters measured.

Conclusion: There does not appear to be any cosmetic benefit from MIS, when performing THR via the posterior approach. The length of wound was of little concern to patients, while the colour of the scar was the highest-scoring factor in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale. We therefore conclude that there is no long-term benefit from mini-incision surgery for THR via the posterior approach.

Introduction: Hip replacement patients are prone to dislocations during extreme hip movement in the early post operative period. An activity of daily living that puts them at risk of dislocation is picking an object off the floor. The aim of this study was to assess the movement of the hip using different techniques to pick an object of the floor.

Methods: An electromagnetic tracking system was used to assess hip movements for four different techniques in picking an object from the floor. These were -

Flexing forward to pick an object up between the feet.

Measurements were taken from 40 hips in 20 normal subjects aged 21 to 61. Sensors were attached over the iliac crest and the mid-shaft of the lateral thigh. Data was then collected from the magnetic tracker as each technique was repeated 3 times. The system recorded hip flexion and rotation data at 10 hertz, with an accuracy better than 1 degree. Data was then analysed and the mean readings for each technique were compared.

Results: For each of the four techniques listed above the respective mean (SD) results were:

Flexion: 81.4 (27.5), 83.3 (27.6), 93.3 (28.7) and 33.5 (17.6) degrees.

The most significant movements for each technique were flexion and external rotation.

The movements with the least and most flexion were kneeling (33.5 deg) and squatting (93.3 deg). They were significantly different with a paired t-test p< < 0.001.

The movement with the least and most external rotation were kneeling (7.5 deg) and side pick up (22.7 deg). They were significantly different with a paired t-test, p< < 0.001.

Conclusion: This study has found that the most effective technique to pick up an object from the floor is kneeling as this has the least amount of flexion and external rotation. We conclude that this is the safest technique in carrying out this activity in the early post operative stage for patients who have undergone a total hip replacement.

Introduction: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) following hip arthroplasty can produce abnormal loading leading to pain, increased wear and loosening of implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between LLD and static limb loading.

Methods: A pedobarograph was used to measure the limb loading of 19 normal volunteers aged 18 to 58. Each volunteer was asked to stand on the Pedobarograph with both feet so that their weight could be recorded. The load through the left leg was then recorded with the right leg on a platform level beside it. The platform was then raised in 1 cm increments to 6 cm, to simulate different levels of LLD. In each position 3 readings were taken with the right knee flexed (pelvis level), and straight (pelvis tilted).

Results: When the feet were level the left leg took 53 % of the load. As the height of the right foot was increased the load through the left leg increased in a non-linear fashion.

With the knee flexed, a 1 cm difference produced a 3 % increase in loading. This was significant (P< 0.05). All subsequent increases were also significant. The largest increase in load was observed between 1 cm & 2 cm (+5 %). At 6cm the left leg load was 70.9 %.

With the pelvis tilted, there were smaller increases in loading. These did not become significant until a difference of 5 cm. The maximum load was 62.1 % at 6 cm.

Discussion: The length-loading relationship was non-linear. The pelvis tilted stance produced less loading asymmetry, but more discomfort than the flexed knee stance.

Introduction: Activities that require extreme hip movement can dislocate hip implants in the early post operative phase. The aim of this study was to assess the movement of the hip using four different techniques to retrieve an object from the floor.

Methods: An electromagnetic tracker was used to measure hip movement during these retrieval techniques:-

Flexing forward to pick up an object between the feet

Measurements were taken from 50 hips in 25 normal subjects aged 21 to 61. Sensors were attached over the iliac crest and the mid-shaft of the lateral thigh. Data was collected as each technique was repeated 3 times. The tracker recorded hip flexion and rotation data at 10 hertz, with an accuracy of 0.15 degree.

Results: For each of the four techniques the respective mean (SD) movements were:-

Flexion: 75.8(28.6), 79.2(27.2), 87.5(29.7) and 30.4(17.3).

Kneeling had significantly less flexion and external rotation than all the other techniques (paired t-test, P< < 0.001).

Discussion: Flexion and external rotation were the most significant movements for each technique. The movements with the least and most flexion were kneeling (30.40) and squatting (87.50). The movement with the least and most external rotation were kneeling (7.30) and side pick up (20.10).

Kneeling has the least amount of movement, therefore, it minimises the risk of dislocation when retrieving an object from the floor.

Introduction: Posterior dislocation of replacement hips may occur during extreme hip flexion and adduction. Hip braces restrict movement, but they are uncomfortable and have a low patient compliance. Knee braces are more comfortable, and also restrict hip movement, by tightening the hamstrings. This study investigated the effect of a knee brace on hip movement.

Methods: A magnetic tracker was used to measure the movement of 20 normal hips in 20 volunteers, aged 25–62. Sensors were attached over the iliac spine and lateral thigh. Subjects were asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times with their knee bent and three times with their knee braced in extension. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles, with an accuracy of 0.15 degrees.

Results: With the knee flexed, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.00 (SD 11.0). With the knee braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.30 (SD 15.4). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46 % (30.70) (paired t-test, P < < 0.001).

With the knee flexed, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.70 (SD 7.1). With the knee braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.60 (SD 5.6). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9 % (2.10). This was not significant (paired t-test, P = 0.3).

Discussion: These results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance is expected.

Introduction: Modular prostheses were first developed for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the 1980s as a potential solution to the problem of leg length inequality. There is much literature discussing the advantages and disadvantages of modularity in THA but there are few studies directly comparing modular and non-modular prostheses and their accuracy in restoring normal anatomy. Our aim was to assess whether modularity in THA improves the restoration of femoral offset and leg length.

Methods: An analysis of post-operative radiographs of 76 patients who underwent THA - 38 using modular and 38 using non-modular prostheses was undertaken. The femoral offset and leg length of the operated and un-operated hip were measured for each patient. Inter-and intra-observer errors were reduced to a minimum. A two-tailed T test was then applied to the data.

Results: Restoration of leg length (to within +/− 10mm of the un-operated hip) was achieved in 81.6% of patients in the non-modular group, compared to 78.9% in the modular group (p=0.60). On average, the modular system increases leg length of the operated hip by 0.64mm compared to the non-modular system, which reduces leg length by 3.76mm (p=0.016). The femoral offset is restored to within 5mm of the un-operated hip in 60.5% of modular THA and in 55.3% using a non-modular prosthesis (P=0.48). On average, modular prostheses increased offset by 0.85mm and non-modular prostheses by 0.15mm (P=0.64).

Discussion: The modular and non-modular hip prostheses are equally successful in achieving restoration of leg length and femoral offset to the pre-pathological state.

Introduction: Posterior dislocation of replacement hip joints may occur during hip flexion and adduction. A hip brace is commonly used for recurrent dislocations in patients awaiting revision surgery or when unfit for it. However, these hip braces are cumbersome and have a low patient compliance.

Knee braces are more comfortable to wear, and they also restrict hip movement by tightening the hamstrings. With this background we investigated the effect of a knee brace, applied in full extension, on hip flexion and adduction.

Methods: The movement of 20 normal hips in 20 healthy volunteers aged 25–62, were assessed using a magnetic tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak). One tracking sensor was attached near the anterior superior iliac spine and another one on the lateral aspect of the thigh at a fixed distance from the knee joint. Subjects were then asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times each with the knee bent and then with their knee braced in extension. Two sets of three readings were recorded. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles, with a measurement accuracy of 0.15 degrees.

Results: With a flexed knee, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.0 degrees (CI95 = 61.1, 70.8). With the knee braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.3 (CI95 = 28.5, 42.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46% (30.7 deg). A paired t-test found this highly significant, with P < < 0.001.

With a flexed knee, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.7 degrees (CI95 = 20.6, 26.9). With the knee braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.6 (CI95 = 19.2, 24.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9% (2.1 deg). A paired t-test found this was not significant with P = 0.3.

Conclusion: The results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance is expected.

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a recognised complication of total hip arthroplasty. LLDs can cause abnormal weight bearing, leading to increased wear, aseptic loosening of replacement hips and pain. To compensate for LLDs the patient can either flex the knee of the long leg or tilt their pelvis. The aim of this project was to investigate how stance affects static limb loading of patients with leg length discrepancy.

A pedobarograph was used to measure the limb loading of 20 normal volunteers aged 19 to 60. A 2 second recording with both feet on was taken to establish their body weight. Readings were taken of the left foot with the right level, 3.5cm lower (simulating a long left leg) and 3.5cm higher. In each case three readings were taken with the knee flexed and three readings with the knee extended.

When both feet were at the same level, the left limb took 54% of the load.

When the right foot was lower and the left knee flexed, the left leg took 39 % of the load (P < 0.001) (paired t-test). When the left knee was extended the left leg took 49 % of the load (P = 0.074).

With the right foot higher and right knee flexed, the left leg took 65 % of the load (P < 0.001). When the right knee was extended the left leg took 58 % of the load (P = 0.069).

These results show that weight distribution is increased in the simulated shorter limb. Loading is greater when the longer limb is flexed. Tilting the pelvis reduced the load. However this may cause pelvic and spinal problems.

Uneven load distribution is likely to lead to early fatigue when standing and may explain why some post arthroplasty patients with limb length discrepancy have poor outcomes.

Posterior dislocation of replacement hips may occur during hip flexion and adduction. Whilst hip braces can restrict hip movement, they are cumbersome and have a low patient compliance. Knee braces are more comfortable to wear and also restrict hip movement by tightening the hamstrings. This study investigated the effect of a knee brace on hip flexion and adduction.

The movement of 20 normal hips in 20 healthy volunteers aged 25–62, were assessed using a magnetic tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak). Tracking sensors were attached over the iliac crest and lateral thigh. Subjects were asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times with their knee bent. A knee brace was then applied and the hip movements were repeated with the knee extended. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles with an accuracy of 0.15 degrees.

When the knee was flexed, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.00 (CI95 = 61.1, 70.8). When the knee was braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.30 (CI95 = 28.5, 42.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46 % (30.70). A paired t-test found this highly significant (P < 0.001).

When the knee was flexed, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.70 (CI95 = 20.6, 26.9). When the knee was braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.60 (CI95 = 19.2, 24.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9 % (2.10). A paired t-test found this was not significant (P = 0.3).

These results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance can be expected.

The JRI cemented total hip replacement consisted of an acetabulum with a gamma irradiated UHMW polyethylene cup encased in a titanium metal shell, a 32 mm titanium head, and forged titanium alloy stem. Revision of this implant for failure, in particular that of the acetabulum, and the lack of published survivorship prompted a retrospective review of the local series. Data was compiled from theatre log books, patient records and X-rays.

During the period 1989–1997 a single surgeon performed 304 total hip replacements using this JRI prosthesis through an anterior lateral approach. The average age was 70 (48–96), with 186 (61%) female and 85% performed for osteoarthritis. Complete data was available in 236 cases to allow further analysis. The average follow up was 9.3 (1–17) years. During this period 37 hips had to be revised: 28 for a loose acetabulum, both components were loose in 5, and 3 had revision for infection. The mean time to revision was 7.4 (1–17) years.

This data provides a revision rate of at least 16% at ten years. This data does not take potential earlier radiographic failure nor patient function into account. This prosthesis therefore fails to comply with modern benchmarks for survivorship of implants. Furthermore this study highlights the importance of ongoing review of patients who have undergone joint replacement, in particular those with implants that have problems with design, as has been demonstrated in other metal backed components.

Introduction: Many authors have stated that open reduction and internal fixation of displaced ankle fractures give better results than conservative management (Hughes et al, Clin Orthop 1979; Tunturi et al, Acta Orthop Scand 1983; Philips et al, JBJS 1985 and ). However, there is little information on the long-term outcome of operated ankle fractures. There is inadequate knowledge of patient perception of ankle function following operative treatment of these injuries.

Aim: To analyse long-term results following operative treatment of these fractures using a patient centred outcome measure.

Methods: 112 patients had undergone operative fixation of isolated, closed bi-malleolar ankle fractures between 1992 and 1996 at Middlesbrough General Hospital. All patients had undergone operative fixation using standard AO principles. An independent assessor ascertained the quality of reduction using standardised radiological parameters (Joy et al JBJS 1974, Sarkisian & Cody J Trauma 1976, Mont et al J Ortop Trauma 1992) to assess the post-operative X-ray films. All postoperative reductions were within the parameters of a good reduction.

The modified Olerud & Molander ankle score questionnaire was sent by post to all patients identified living in the region.

Results: 66 out of 112 patients responded; 34 (52%) leading a sedentary lifestyle and 32 (48%) a moderate/ active lifestyle. Mean age of the patients was 47 years. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 11 years (average 7 years).

Olerud and Molander scores ranged from 5 to 100, with a mean score of 66.5 (SD 27.6), and median score of 70. Only 9 (13.6%) patients had a score of 100. Comparisons between Olerud and Molander scores were made with regard to: gender, whether metal work was removed at a second operation, Weber classification (B vs C) and patient’s lifestyle. No significant differences were observed

The associations between Olerud and Molander score and the key variables were assessed using non-parametric (Spearman’s) correlation coefficients. None of the variables considered were significantly associated with Olerud and Molander score.

Conclusion: The study would suggest that, despite modern fixation techniques, few patients following bi-malleolar ankle fracture have a symptom free ankle. There is no obvious parameter to predict outcome in patients who are managed appropriately for these injuries.