External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure mainly used in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). A stable fixation combined with bone-ends compression is basic to achieve knee fusion in such a scenario but providing enough stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss after multiple previous procedures. Compared with monoplanar configuration, a biplanar frame achieves improved coronal stiffness, while providing the advantages of good access to the wound and allowance of early ambulation. Our primary hypothesis stated that a biplanar frame would achieve higher and quicker fusion rate than a monolateral configuration. We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients managed with biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR between 2014 and 2018. We compared this group of patients with a historical cohort-control patient who had been previously published by our unit in 2013, since we switched from a monoplanar to a biplanar configuration for the management of this kind of complex end-stage iTKR. Primary end-points were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life were also evaluated.Aim
Method
