Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 62 - 62
22 Nov 2024
Mueller MM Kowald B Gerlach U Grimme C Schulz A Frosch K Schoop-Schmetgens R
Full Access

Aim

Aim of this study was to establish the first clinical results after implantation of ultrathin silver-polysiloxane-coated1 plates in the treatment of infected non-union of the femoral shaft.

Method

As part of the REFECT study, a prospective, non-interventional analysis was conducted encompassing all patients who received internal stabilization with a silver-coated1 plate from 01/2023 to 09/2024 as part of the treatment for infected non-union of the femur. Standardized clinical follow-ups including PROMs (WOMAC-Index, LEF-S, EQ-5D, VAS) and X-rays were performed 3, 6, 12 (and 24) months postoperatively.

For comparison, a retrospective analysis of 76 patients with infected femoral non-union, who had received a stabilization with an uncoated plate in the past 10 years, was performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 38 - 38
2 Jan 2024
Frese J Schulz A Kowald B Gerlach U Frosch K Schoop R
Full Access

In a consecutive retrospective analysis of 190 patients treated with the Masquelet technique at the BG Klinikum Hamburg from January 2012 to January 2022, defect-specific features such as the extent and morphology of the defect were recorded, and their influence on the time to reach full weight-bearing of the affected limb was investigated.

A total of 217 defects were treated in 190 patients using the Masquelet technique. 70% of all defects were located in the tibia, followed by 22% in the femur and only about 7% in the upper extremity. The average length of all defects was 58 mm (+/−31 mm), with the largest defect measuring 180 mm and the smallest measuring 20 mm. 89% of the patients achieved full weight-bearing at the end of therapy. The average time from initiation of therapy to reaching safe full weight-bearing was 589 days. There was a significant correlation between defect length and time to reach full weight-bearing (p = 0.0134). These results could serve as a basis for creating a score for prognostics and evaluation of bone healing after treatment with the Masquelet technique. Additionally, the results could help guide indications for secondary stabilization using internal fixation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 79 - 79
1 Dec 2018
Schoop R Ulf-Joachim G
Full Access

Aim

For which patients is bone defect reconstruction with the Masquelet-technique after the treatment of osteomyelitis suitable and which results did we have.

Methods

From 11/2011 to 4/2018 we treated 112 Patients (36f, 76m) with bone defects up 150mm after septic complications with the Masquelet-technique. We had infected-non-unions of upper and lower extremity, chronic osteomyelitis, infected knee-arthrodesis and knee- and ankle-joint-empyema. On average the patients were 52 (10–82) years old. The mean bone defect size was 48 mm (15–150). Most of our patients came from other hospitals, where they had up to 20 (mean 5.1) operations caused by the infection. Time before transfer in our hospital was on average 7,1 months (0,5–48). 77 patients received free (25) or local (52) flaps because of soft tissue-defects. 58 patients suffered a polytrauma. In 23 cases femur, in 4 cases a knee arthrodesis, in 68 cases tibia, in 1 case foot, 6 times ankle-joint arthrodesis, in 6 cases humerus, in 4 cases forearm were infected resulting in bone defects,

In most cases the indication for the Masquelet-technique was low-/incompliance due to higher grade of brain injury and polytrauma followed by difficult soft tissue conditions and problems with segmenttransport.

In 2/3 positive microbial detection succeeded at the first operation. Mainly we found difficult to treat bacteria. After treating the infection with radical sequestrectomy, removal of foreign bodies and filling the defect with antibiotic loaded cementspacer and external fixation we removed the spacer in common 6–8 weeks later and filled the defect with autologeous bone graft. Most of the patients needed an internal fixation after removing of the fixex.

All patients were examined clinically and radiologically every 4–6 weeks in our outpatient department until full weight bearing, later every 3 Months.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_23 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Dec 2016
Schoop R Gerlach U Sonja M
Full Access

Aim

Which patients is bone-defect-reconstruction with the Masquelet-technique suitable and which problems did we see?

Method

From 11/2011 to 4/2016 we treated 49 Patients (12f/37m) with bone-defects up to 150mm after septic complications with the Masquelet-technique. We had infected-non-unions of upper and lower extremity, chronic osteomyelitis, infected knee-arthrodesis and upper-ancle-empyema. On average the patients were 48 (8–74) years old. The mean bone-defect-size was 60 mm (25–150). From other hospitals came 47 of the 49 patient, where they had up to 20 (mean 4,9) operations caused by the infection. The time before transfer to our hospital was on average 177days (6–720). 40 patients receaved flaps because of soft tissue-defects (12 free flaps, 28 local flaps). 21 patients suffered a polytrauma. In 8 cases the femur, in 4 cases a knee-arthrodesis, in 34 cases tibia, in 2 cases humerus and in 1 case the ulna were infected resulting in bone defects. Indication for the Masquelet-technique was low-/incompliance in 35 cases due to higher grade of traumatic brain injury and polytrauma and difficult soft-tissue conditions, in 9 times problems with segment-transport and in 5 cases as dead space management. Positive microbial detection succeeded in 32 patients at the first operation. Mainly we found difficult to treat bacteria. After treating the infection with radical sequestrectomy, removal of foreign bodies and filling the defect with antibiotic loaded cement spacer and external fixation we removed the spacer6–8 weeks later and filled the defect with bone graft. In 23 cases we stabilized the defect then with an internal angle stable plate. All patients were examined clinically and radiologically every 4–6 weeks in our outpatient-department until full weight bearing, later every 3 months.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Dec 2015
Schoop R Ulf-Joachim G Maegerlein S Borreé M
Full Access

For which patients is bone-defect-reconstruction with the Masquelet-technique suitable?

Between 11/2011 and 1/2015 we treated 27 Patients (4 female/ 23 male) with bone-defects up to 150mm after septic complications with the Masquelet-technique.

Reason of the bone defects were infected-non-unions of lower extremity, chronic osteomyelitis, infected knee-arthrodesis, chronic upper-ancle-empyema and infect-defect-non-union of the humerus. On average the patients were 47,5 (18–74) years old. The mean bone-defect-size was 62,6 mm (25–150). 26 of the 27 patients came from other hospitals, where they had up to 20 (mean 4,9) operations caused by the infection. The time before transfer to our hospital was on average 177days (6–720). 25 patients receaved flaps because of soft tissue-defects (7 free flaps, 18 local flaps).

13 patients suffered a polytrauma.

In 5 cases the femur, in 3 cases a knee-arthrodesis, in 18 cases the tibia and in 1 case the humerus was affected by infection resulting in bone defects.

Indication for the Masquelet-technique was low-/incompliance in 10 cases due to higher grade of traumatic brain injury and polytrauma and difficult soft-tissue conditions, in 6 times after problems with segment-transport and in 1 case as dead space management.

Positiv microbial detection succeeded in 19 patients at the first operation although most of the patients underwent long term antibiotic therapy. Mainly we found problematic bacteria. At the time of defect reconstruction with spongious graft we found persistant bacteria in 4 cases.

The first operation aimed treating the infection with radical sequestrectomy, removal of foreign bodies and filling the defect with an antibiotic loaded cementspacer as well as external fixation. 6–8 weeks later we removed the spacer and filled the defect with autologous bonegraft. In 2 cases we needed 2 bone grafts to fill the defect. In 9 cases we removed the fixateur and stabilized the defect with an internal anglestable plate.

All patients were examined clinically and radiologically every 4–6 weeks in our outpatient-department for osteitis until full weight bearing and later every 3months

In 22 of 27 cases the infection was clinically treated successfully. 5 patients are allowed for full weight bearing (all with secondary internal plates). No patient underwent amputation.

There were 4 recurrences of infection, 9 instabilities needing internal stabilization and further bonegraft.

For patients with low-/incompliance for various reasons and for those with difficult soft tissue conditions following flaps the Masquelet technique is a valuable alternative to the normal autologious spongegraft and to the segmenttransport. Internal fixation seems necessary.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 106 - 106
1 Dec 2015
Borrée M Gerlach U Grimme C Schoop R
Full Access

During the therapy of infected pseudarthrosis and arthrodesis in which multiple autologous bone grafts did not result in osseous consolidation and in delayed osseous healing of transport stretches after completion of segmental transport in osteomyelitis patients without acute infection symptoms, mesenchymal stem cells were added to the treatment. This study demonstrates the mid- and long-term results in different application possibilities with good and poor results. The aim is to develop an algorithm in treating bone defects regarding the different biomaterials and implants that exist on the market.

The indication to apply mesenchymal stem cells was the reconstruction of osseous lesions after chronic osteomyelitis, the treatment of pseudarthrosis and the support of osseous growth in segmental transports. Further indications were the absence of adequate amounts of autologous spongiosa, multiple previous operations, risk factors (diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, alcohol and nicotine abuse, etc.) as well as chronic wound healing failure. To obtain the mesenchymal stem cells, we employed two different systems from two companies. Both systems concentrate the mesenchymal stem cells after puncture and aspiration from the pelvic crest. The concentrated stem cells were either mixed with platelet-rich plasma and added to the autologous spongiosa or injected into the area of osseous regeneration after completion of segment transport.

Since 2009, we have applied mesenchymal stem cells to 87patients. The treatment was performed in 73 cases of persisting pseudarthrosis after multiple bone grafts and in 14 cases of delayed osseous healing after segmental transport. The results were evaluated by continuous clinical and radiological examinations in our outpatient clinic.

We found a great variety in our results with a mainly high rate of survival and healing in the autologous bone grafts with mesenchymal stem cells, resulting predominantly in stabilization of the pseudarthrosis. Furthermore a good osseous consolidation was documented in several cases with transport stretches of segmental transports.

However we also had some frustrating results with all the well-known complications of septic surgery.

Our experiences so far, have led to a distinguished therapy-algorithm including all the biomaterials and additives that are used in our hospital.

Overall, the results demonstrate an advantage in the treatment with mesenchymal stem cells, espe-cially in problematic and difficult cases in combination with multiple pre-existing conditions.

The use of mesenchymal stemcells must be included in a general concept regarding all treatment possibilities, it is, however, not a guarantee for successful therapy of osseous lesions after chronic osteomyelitis especially as a single toll mechanism.