header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 24 - 24
1 Mar 2005
Hohmann E Schmid A
Full Access

Traumatic shoulder dislocations at young age result in a significant re-dislocation rate and lead to chronic instability. Conservative treatment fails in 25–96% of cases especially in young active patients. The accepted standard treatment is the classical open Bankart repair which almost always results in loss of motion. The development of new techniques and devices has lead to an increase in arthroscopic techniques for shoulder stabilisations.

Between September 1996 and October 2000 262 arthroscopic shoulder stabilisations were performed by the senior author: 159 cases FASTak® titanium anchors, 26 Panalok® anchors and 57 cases Suretac® anchors were used. Minimum follow up was 12 months with a mean follow up of 24.9 months (12–50). Rowe score and a visual analogue scale was used to measure patient satisfaction.

The Rowe score increased to 83,1 +/− 20,9. The visual analogue score demonstrated overall patient satisfaction. Complications included redislocations(4.7%) sub-luxations (6.3%) and ongoing instability (6.3%). Return to sports occurred in 89.1% of patients with 68.4% being able to return to their previous sports activity level.

This study demonstrates that arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation is comparable to the gold standard open Bankart repair. It is associated with a high patient satisfaction, lower morbidity, faster return to the previous activity level, better range of motion and less postoperative pain. The disadvantage of the technique is a long learning curve and the potentially longer operating times.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 24 - 24
1 Mar 2005
Hohmann E Schmid A Martinek V Imhoff A
Full Access

Posttraumatic shoulder instability is a common problem in the field of sports medicine. Especially overhead athletes need intact stabilisers to meet the functional requirements. Open procedures often result in limitations of movement postoperatively. Arthroscopic techniques offer potential advantages such as better range of motion and shorter rehabilitation times.

Between September 1996 and October 2000 159 arthroscopic shoulder stabilisations were performed with FASTak® anchors. The mean follow up was 24.9 months (12–50). Rowe score and a visual analogue scale were used to measure patient satisfaction. 72 patients (m=57, f=15)with a mean age of 27.6 years (17–65) were included and clinically examined.

The Rowe score increased to 83.1 after primary stabilisation and 68.1 after revision procedures. The visual analogue score demonstrated overall patient satisfaction. 89.1% (n=64) of the patients could return to sports with 68,4% (n=49) being able to return to their previous sports activity level. Overhead athletes returned to sports in 89.4% of cases and 63.3% to their pre-injury level. In the non-overhead athletes 86% returned to sports with 60% to their pre-injury level.

This study demonstrates that arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation with FASTak® anchors may be offered to the athlete regardless of the sports activity. It allows return to sports in a high percentage and does offer the potential advantages of a faster return to the previous activity level, better range of motion and less postoperative pain. Disadvantages of the technique is a long learning curve and should therefore only be performed by dedicated and experienced shoulder surgeons.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 488 - 488
1 Apr 2004
Hohmann E Schmid A Martinek V Imhoff A
Full Access

Introduction Traumatic shoulder dislocations at a young age result in a significant re-dislocation rates and lead to chronic instability. Conservative treatment fails in 25% to 96% of cases especially in young active patients. The accepted standard treatment is the classical open Bankart repair. Re-dislocation rate could be decreased to 3.5% to 14.9% but almost always results in loss of motion. The development of new techniques and devices has lead to an increase in arthroscopic techniques for shoulder stabilisations.

Methods Between September 1996 and October 2000, 262 arthroscopic shoulder stabilisations were performed by one surgeon (ABI). For the refixation of the injured labrum suture anchors were used. In 159 cases FASTak (Arthrex) titanium anchors, in 26 cases Panalok (Mitek) and in 57 cases Suretac (Smith and Nephew) were used. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a mean follow-up of 24.9 months (12 to 50). Exclusion criteria were SLAP and HAGL lesions, glenoid fractures, the inverted pear sign and hooked or posterior dislocations. Rowe score and a visual analogue scale were used to measure patient satisfaction.

Results The Rowe score increased to 83.1 +/− 20.9. The visual analogoue score demonstrated overall patient satisfaction. The redislocation rate was five percent, three percent having a history of adequate trauma. Complaints of subluxations and ongoing instability occured in six percent. Eighty-nine percent of the patients could return to sports with 68% being able to return to their previous sports level.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation is comparable to the golden standard of open Bankart repair.