Suppressive antimicrobial therapy (SAT) is used worldwide for patients with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI but clear definitions or guidelines regarding the indications, antimicrobial strategy or treatment duration are currently lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to identify the global differences in the clinical practice of SAT for PJI. An online survey was designed to investigate the current opinion on indication and treatment goals, preferred antimicrobial drugs, dosing and treatment duration and follow-up of patients with PJI on suppression. The survey was distributed using e-mail lists of several international bone and joint infection societies and study groups. Recipients were asked to share the survey with colleagues who were not a member of one of the societies but who were involved in PJI care.Aim
Method
Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed due to toxicity and drug-drug interactions that frequently occur with this strategy. Data from recent clinical studies suggests equipoise for other antimicrobial treatment regimens. The objective of the The RiCOTTA-trial is a multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating clindamycin versus rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in the oral treatment phase in patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR. The trial is performed in 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with staphylococcal knee or hip PJI managed by DAIR. Patients are included one to six days before antibiotic treatment is switched from intravenous to oral therapy. Patients with a contraindication for rifampicin, with a megaprosthesis or who receive intravenous antibiotics for more than three weeks after initial debridement are excluded. Primary outcome is treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment. Success is defined as the absence of: i. Infection related re-surgery, ii. New episode of antibiotic treatment for infection of the index joint after the initial treatment phase of 12 weeks, iii. Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up, iv. Death. The estimated treatment success of rifampicin combination therapy is 85% and the monotherapy strategy is considered not inferior when the difference in treatment success will be less than 10%. Enrolment of 158 patients per group (316 in total) is needed to confirm non-inferiority of monotherapy with a power of 80%. The trial is currently open for enrolment. The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands and registered under EU trial number 2022-501620-26-00 in Clinical Trial Information System.Aim
Method
Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of complex bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly implemented but studies evaluating this approach are scarce. We assessed the effectiveness of our MDT by analyzing the adherence to its treatment decisions. A cohort study was conducted comprising patients with complex BJI of which the management was discussed during MDT meetings between 2015 and 2022 in a tertiary care academic hospital. Patient characteristics and MDT data were obtained from electronic patient records.Aim
Method
The duration and extent of postoperative wound leakage after joint arthroplasty in patients with or without a complicated course, like a prosthetic joint infection (PJI), is currently unknown. Adequate differentiation between normal postoperative wound leakage and wound leakage due to a postoperative PJI is important and prevents unnecessary surgical procedures. We investigated the association between postoperative wound leakage and development of PJI in patients who used a previously developed mobile wound care app. A multicenter, prospective cohort study with patients aged 18 years or older after primary implantation or revision of a total joint arthroplasty. During 30 post-operative days after arthroplasty, patients recorded their wound status in the woundcare app. An algorithm calculated a daily score from imputed data. If the daily score exceeded a predefined threshold, the patients received an alert that advised them to contact their physician.Background
Methods
Treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) usually consists of surgical debridement and prolonged rifampicin combination therapy. Tailored antimicrobial treatment alternatives are needed due to frequent side effects and drug-drug interactions with rifampicin combination therapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of several alternative antibiotic strategies in patients with staphylococcal PJI. In this prospective, multicenter registry-based study, all consecutive patients with a staphylococcal PJI, treated with DAIR or one-stage revision surgery between January 1st, 2015 and November 3rd, 2020, were included. Patients were treated according to a predefined protocol for PJI. Antimicrobial treatment strategies differed between centers, which was accepted and used as pseudorandomization. Depending on the hospital patients were admitted to, they were treated with either a long-term rifampicin strategy (consisting of 12 weeks rifampicin combination therapy) ore one of several short-term rifampicin strategies, consisting of only five days of rifampicin combination treatment, started immediately postoperative, followed by clindamycin, flucloxacillin or vancomycin monotherapy. Patients were stratified in different groups, depending on the used antimicrobial strategy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcome between the groups.Background
Methods
The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the association between exchange of modular parts in debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure and outcomes for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until May 2021. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression was used to estimate, on a study level, the success rate of DAIR related to component exchange. Risk of bias was appraised using the (AQUILA) checklist.Aims
Methods
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains the most severe complication of arthroplasty. Failure of intensive, long-term antibiotic treatment for PJI often requires removal of the implant. Antibiotic failure is thought to be caused by biofilm and persister formation. Novel anti-biofilm and anti-persister strategies are urgently needed. Here, we investigated the effects of several antimicrobial peptides on the bacteria within antibiotic-treated biofilms in an On polystyrene, a mature (7 day-old) methicillin-resistant Aims
Methods
Current antibiotic treatment strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are based mostly on observational retrospective studies. High-quality data from prospective cohorts using identical treatment strategies may improve current clinical practice. We developed a regional network of collaborating hospitals and established a uniform treatment protocol. Data from all patients diagnosed with a PJI are prospectively registered in a an online database. With this quality registry we aim to study the outcome of antibiotic and surgical strategies while adhering to a pre-established treatment protocol. A working group of orthopaedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists and microbiologists was established. The working group reached consensus on definition of PJI and a uniform treatment protocol, based on current guidelines and expert-based clinical experience. A website was built to communicate information to colleagues and patients (Aims
Methods
There is a theoretical advantage for immediate postoperative start of rifampicin after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Anti-biofilm treatment may be mostly needed during the first postoperative days in order to prevent new biofilm formation. However, there are concerns with regard to development of rifampicin resistance if rifampicin is started too early. Rifampicin monotherapy will rapidly result in rifampicin resistance, but this may not occur when prescribed as part of combination antimicrobial therapy and after thorough surgical debridement. We hypothesized that in this setting the probability of development of rifampicin resistance is very low. We evaluated the frequency of development of rifampicin resistance in patients with acute staphylococcal PJI who were treated with DAIR followed by immediate postoperative start of rifampicin in combination with a betalactam or glycopeptide. During 2003–2014, all patients with an acute staphylococcal PJI were treated with five days of high-dose rifampicin (600mg bid) in combination with at least 6 weeks of betalactam or glycopeptide antibiotics, both started immediately postoperative after DAIR. Clinical outcome and development of rifampicin resistance in patients who failed were monitored. Susceptibility testing for rifampicin was performed by Vitek 2 (Biomerieux). Until 2014, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for rifampicin resistance were applied (S ≤ 1), from 2014 EUCAST criteria (S ≤ 0.06) were applied.Aim
Method
Early discharge of patients after joint arthroplasty leaves patients responsible for monitoring their postoperative wound by themselves. This might result in a delayed presentation of postoperative complications. The use of a mobile woundcare app by patients after arthroplasty might result in (1) earlier report of complications, (2) an increase in patient satisfaction and (3) insight in the incidence and duration of postoperative wound leakage. Therefore, the ease of use and perceived usefulness of using a postoperative mobile woundcare app in patients after joint arthroplasty was investigated. A cohort study was conducted in 2017 in 2 Dutch Hospitals. Eligible cases were all consecutive patients that received an arthroplasty and who owned a smartphone. During the first 30 postoperative days, patients filled in daily reviews of their wound and took a photo of the wound. Based on the review, an underlying algorithm calculated daily a score that prompted a mobile alert if needed, which advised patients to contact the hospital. Patients filled in a form on day 30 and day 90 in order to document occurrence of any postoperative wound complication. On day 15 and 30, patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire evaluating the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the App.Aim
Method
