Previous studies showed that a fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating (DAC®, Novagenit Srl, Mezzolombardo, TN, Italy) composed of covalently linked hyaluronan and poly-D, L-lactide, is able to reduce early post-surgical infection both after joint replacement and osteosynthesis. Aim of the present report is to investigate medium-term safety and efficacy of the coating in patients undergoing primary and revision cementless total hip replacement (THR).

We designed a two-phases study. In both phases, DAC was prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. In brief, the syringe prefilled with 300 mg of sterile DAC powder was mixed, at the time of surgery, with a solution of 5 mL of sterile water and with the tailored antibiotics, at a concentration ranging from 25 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL. The resulting antibacterial hydrogel was then spread on the outer surface of the prosthesis just before implantation.

In the first phase, safety was assessed. Forty-six patients (13 primary and 33 revision THR) were treated with DAC between 2013 and 2015 and evaluated at a 2.8 ± 0.7 years follow up (FU). Antibiotics used for DAC reconstruction were Vancomycin in 33 cases, Vancomycin + Meropenem in 10, Vancomycin + Rifampicin, Teicoplanin or Ceftazidime in 1 case, respectively. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly after with a clinical and radiographic FU. No evidence of infection and no failure/loosening of the prosthesis were observed. No adverse events were reported.

The second phase was designed to evaluate efficacy of DAC in preventing infection recurrences after a two stage revision for infected THR. Twenty-seven patients, treated with DAC coating, were compared with a control group of 32, treated in the same time period, without the coating. Demographics, host type and and identified bacteria were similar in the two groups (18.6% of MRSA in DAC group vs 18.5% MRSA in no-DAC group). Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly thereafter. At a minimum 2 years FU (mean 2.7), we observed 1 dislocation in each group and 2 cases of loosening in the no-DAC group. 4 cases (11%) of recurrence of infection in the no-DAC group (1 MRSA and 3 St. Epidermidis) and no infection recurrences in the DAC group. Due to the small cohort of patients this difference is not statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p=0.18).

This is, to our knowledge, the longest observation concerning the safety and efficacy of the DAC antibacterial coating, applied to hip replacement. The results are in line with those previously reported and point out the absence of side effects of the antibacterial coating in this application and the tendency to reduce re-infection in second stage. This finding needs to be confirmed by a larger dataset.

Aim

The treatment of osteomyelitis often requires extensive surgical debridement and removal of all infected tissues and foreign bodies. Resulting bone loss can then eventually be managed with antibacterial bone substitutes, that may also serve as a regenerative scaffold. Aim of the present study is to report the clinical results of a continuous series of patients, treated at our centre with an antibacterial bioglass*.

Infection remains among the first reasons for failure of joint prosthesis. Currently, the golden standard for treating prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is two-stage revision. However, two-stage procedures have been reported to be associated with higher costs and possible higher morbidity and mortality, compared to one-stage. Furthermore, recent studies showed the ability of a fast-resorbable, antibacterial-loaded hydrogel coating to reduce surgical site infections after joint replacement, by preventing bacterial colonization of implants. Aim of this study was then to compare the infection recurrence rate after a one-stage, cemenless exchange, performed with an antibacterial coated implant versus a standardized two-stage revision procedure.

In this two-center prospective study, 22 patients, candidate to revision surgery for PJI, were enrolled to undergo a one-stage revision surgery with cementless implants, coated intra-operatively with a fast-resorbable, antibiotic-loaded hyaluronan and poly-D,L-lactide based hydrogel coating (“Defensive Antibacterial Coating”, DAC, Novagenit, Italy). DAC was reconstructed according to manufacturer indications and loaded with Vancomycin or Vancomycin + Meropenem, according to cultural examinations, and directly spread onto the implant before insertion. This prospective cohort was compared with a retrospective series of 22 consecutive patients, matched for age, sex, host type, site of surgery, that underwent a two stage procedure, using a preformed, antibiotic-loaded spacer (Tecres, Italy) and a cementless implant. The second surgery, for definitive implant placing, was performed only after CRP normalization and no clinical sign of infection. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic evaluation were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Infection recurrence was defined by the presence of a sinus tract communicating with the joint, or at least two among the following criteria: clinical signs of infections; elevated CRP and ESR; elevated synovial fluid WBC count; elevated synovial fluid leukocyte esterase; a positive cultural examination from synovial fluid; radiographic signs of stem loosening.

The two groups did not differ significantly for age, sex, host type and site of surgery (18 knees and 4 hips, respectively). The DAC hydrogel was loaded intra-operatively, according to cultural examination, with vancomycin (14 patients) or vancomycin and meropenem (8 cases). At a mean follow-up of 20.2 ± 6.3 months, 2 patients (9.1%) in the DAC group showed an infection recurrence, compared to 3 patients (13.6%) in the two-stage group. No adverse events associated with the use of DAC or radiographic loosening of the stem were observed at the latest follow-up months.

This is the first report on one-stage cementless revision surgery for PJI, performed with a fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating. Our data, although in a limited series of patients and at a relatively short follow-up, show similar infection recurrence rate after one-stage exchange with cementless, coated implants, compared to two-stage revision. These findings warrant further studies in the possible applications of antibacterial coating technologies to treat implant-related infections.

Aim

The induced membrane technique (IMT) or Masquelet technique is a two-step surgical procedure used to treat bony defects (traumatic or resulting from tumoral resections) and pseudo arthroses, even caused by infections. The relatively small case series reported, sometimes with variants to the original technique, make it difficult to assess the real value of the technique. Aim of this study was then to undertake a systematic review of the literature with a particular focus on bone union, infection eradication and complication rates.

Infection is among the first reasons for failure of orthopedic implants. Various antibacterial coatings for implanted biomaterials are under study, but only few technologies are currently available in the clinical setting. Previous studies showed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy and safety of a fast resorbable (<96 h) hyaluronic and polylactic acid based hydrogel, loaded with antibiotic or antibiofilm agents (DAC®, Novagenit Srl, Mezzolombardo, TN). Aim of this study is to report the results of the largest clinical trial in trauma and orthopedic patients.

In this prospective, controlled, study, a total of 184 patients (86 treated with internal osteosinthesis for closed fractures and 98 undergoing cementless total hip or knee joint prosthesis) were randomly assigned in three European orthopaedic centers to receive antibiotic-loaded DAC coating or to a control group, without coating. Pre- and post-operative assessment of laboratory tests, wound healing (ASEPSIS score), clinical score (SF-12 score) and x-rays were performed at fixed time intervals. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher exact test or Student's t test. Significance level was set at p<0.05.

The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee and all patients provided a written informed consent.

On average, wound healing, clinical scores, laboratory tests and radiographic findings did not show any significant difference between the two-groups at a mean 12 months follow-up (min: 6, max: 18 months).

Four surgical site infections and two delayed union were observed in the control group compared to none in the treated group.

No local or systemic side effects, that could be related to DAC hydrogel coating, were noted and no detectable interference with bone healing or osteointegration could be found

This is the largest study, with the longest follow-up, reporting on clinical results after the use of a fast-resosrbable anti-bacterial hydrogel coating for orthopaedic and trauma implants. Our results show the safety of the tested coating in different indications; although not statistically significant, the data also show a trend towards surgical site infection reduction, as previously demonstrated in the animal models.

The best surgical modality for treating chronic periprosthetic shoulder infections has not been established, with a lack of randomised comparative studies. This systematic review compares the infection eradication rate and functional outcomes after single- or two-stage shoulder exchange arthroplasty, to permanent spacer implant or resection arthroplasty.

Full-text papers and those with an abstract in English published from January 2000 to June 2014, identified through international databases, were reviewed. Those reporting the success rate of infection eradication after a single-stage exchange, two-stage exchange, resection arthroplasty or permanent spacer implant were included, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and sample size of 5 patients.

Eight original articles reporting the results after resection arthroplasty (n = 83), 6 on single-stage exchange (n = 75), 13 on two-stage exchange (n = 142) and 8 papers on permanent spacer (n = 68) were included.

The average infection eradication rate was 86.7% at a mean follow-up of 39.8 months (SD 20.8) after resection arthroplasty, 94.7% at 46.8 months (SD 17.6) after a single-stage exchange, 90.8% at 37.9 months (SD 12.8) after two-stage exchange, and 95.6% at 31.0 months (SD 9.8) following a permanent spacer implant. The difference was not statistically significant.

Regarding functional outcome, patients treated with single-stage exchange had statistically significant better postoperative Constant scores (mean 51, SD 13) than patients undergoing a two-stage exchange (mean 44, SD 9), resection arthroplasty (mean 32, SD 7) or a permanent spacer implant (mean 31, SD 9) (p=0.029). However, when considering studies comparing pre- and post-operative Constant scores, the difference was not statistically significant.

This systematic review failed to demonstrate a clear difference in infection eradication and functional improvement between all four treatment modalities for established periprosthetic shoulder infection. The relatively low number of patients and the methodological limitations of the studies available point out the need for well designed multi-center trials to further assess the best treatment option of peri-prosthetic shoulder infection.