The aim of this study was to explore whether adverse reactions would occur during the material’s degradation period even at a later time point after surgery and whether these phenomena were clinically significant and would influence the final outcome.

12 unstable, displaced metacarpal fractures in 10 patients (7 males, 3 females; mean age 36.4 y, range 18–75 y) were treated with the Inion^® OTPSTM Biodegradable Mini Plating System. 9 patients (10 fractures) were available for follow-up (mean 25.6 months, range 14 to 44 m). For patients without appearance of foreign body reaction the minimum follow-up time was 24 months

Patients were examined both radiologically to evaluate fracture healing, and clinically by completing the DASH-score and a visual analogue scale for pain assessment. Grip strength, finger strength and range of motion of metacarpo-phalangeal and interphalangeal joints were measured.

Fracture healing occurred uneventfully in all patients within six weeks. The most important complication was a foreign body reaction observed in 4 of our patients more than a year postoperatively. All were re-operated and had the materials removed. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of aseptic inflammation and foreign body reaction.

Although internal fixation of metacarpal fractures by using bioabsorbable implants is a satisfactory alternative fixation method, patients should be advised of this possible late complication and should be followed postoperatively for at least one and a half year, possibly longer.

Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to explore whether adverse reactions would occur during the material’s degradation period even at a later time point after fracture healing had been completed, in metacarpal fractures treated with third generation bioabsorbable implants.

Materials and Methods: 12 unstable, displaced metacarpal fractures in 10 consecutive patients (7 males, 3 females; mean age 36.4 y, range 18–75 y) were treated with third generation absorbable plates and screws (Inion^® OTPSTM Biodegradable Mini Plating System), where resorption is supposed to occur within 2 to 4 years. 9 patients (10 fractures) were available for follow-up (mean 25.6 months, range 14 to 44 m) and were examined both clinically and radiologically. For patients without appearance of foreign body reaction the minimum follow-up time was 24 months.

Results: Fracture healing was uneventful in all cases. A foreign body reaction was observed more than a year postoperatively in 4 patients, who were subjected to surgical debridement and implant remnants removal. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of aseptic inflammation and foreign body reaction. 2 further patients reported a self subsiding transient local swelling.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that modern absorbable implants with longer degradation period have not eliminated the problem of foreign body reaction, but simply postponed it at a later time postoperatively. Patients treated with bioabsorbable implants should be advised of this possible late complication and should be followed for at least two years, possibly longer.

Aim of the study: Mason type I radial head fractures are non-displaced fractures and are treated conservatively with early mobilization and excellent results. The aspiration of the accompanying haematoma is advocated by several authors in order to achieve an analgesic effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of haematoma aspiration on intraarticular pressure and on pain relief after Mason I radial head fractures.

Materials and Methods: 10 patients (6 men and 4 women, age 23–47 y), who presented in the emergency department after an elbow trauma. Following plain radiographs that showed a Mason I radial head fracture, the patients were subjected to haematoma paracentesis. Initially, the intraarticular pressure was measured by using the Stryker Intra-Compartmental Pressure Monitor System. Afterwards, aspiration of the haematoma was performed, followed by a new pressure measurement without moving the needle. Finally, a brachial-elbow-wrist back slab was placed and a questionnaire was completed, including among others pain evaluation before and after haematoma aspiration by using an analogue ten point pain scale.

Results: The intraarticular elbow pressure prior to haematoma aspiration varied from 49 mmHg to 120 mmHg (mean 76.9 mmHg), while following aspiration it ranged from 9 mmHg to 25 mmHg (mean 16.7 mmHg). The mean quantity of the aspired blood was 3.45 ml (0.5 ml to 8.5 ml). Finally, the patients reported a pain decrease from 5.5 (4 to 8) before aspiration to 2.8 (1 to 4) after haematoma aspiration. Decrease for both pressure and pain was statistically significant (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: The built of an intraarticular haematoma in the elbow joint following an undisplaced Mason I radial head fracture leads to a pronounced increase of the intraarticular pressure accompanied by intense pain for the patient. The aspiration of the haematoma results in an acute pressure decrease and an immediate patient relief.

Aim: Assessing Polyethylene wear is very important in following up patients after Total hip replacement (THR) and Livermore method (using callipers) is routinely used by clinicians in calculating this wear. Our aim was to assess if ‘Imagika’, a new computer software programme can accurately assess polyethylene wear(PE-wear). We also compared the computer software with the Livermore method in calculating wear.

Method: We used 15 different THR X rays of patients who had an ABG total hip replacement done. X rays that were included for the calculations were taken at different time intervals following the operation. Wear was calculated on each X ray by 3 clinicians using both the methods, on 3 separate occasions. We compared the Livermore method and the computer software for consistency of measurements and also calculated the inter and intra observer variability for both.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference (at the 5% level) between the measurements taken by the Imagika software and the Livermore method. F(1,88) = 5.38, p< 0.05. There was a statistically significant difference in the inter-observer measurements using the Livermore method. F(2,42) = 4.18, p< 0.05, but there was no significant inter-observer variation using the Imagika computer software. There was no statistically significant difference (at the 5%level) in the intra-observer variability of both groups.

Conclusion: The Imagika computer software proved to be better than the Livermore method in calculating wear with regards to inter-observer bias. There was also a significant difference between measurements taken using both methods. We conclude that the computer software may be a more accurate tool in the assessment of PE-wear in the future.

Purpose: The efficacy of a programme transfusion of pre-deposited autologous blood for patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement and scoliosis or other major spinal surgery was studied.

Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients 56 women and 17 men with an average 39 years (range 14 – 72) entered this program between 1997–2001. According to the surgical necessities predisposition started 2 to 5 weeks preoperatively (one unit per week). The blood bank required that the patients weight more than 40 kilograms and have a haemoglobin mare than 11,5 g/dl. All patients received supplemental ferrous sulfate or ferrous gluconate in dose of 325 mgr three times a day, during the duration period and up to one month postoperatively. Eighty five percent of the patients prede-posited the required number of blood units (2–5 units) while 15% of them predeposited a smaller number due to various reasons (anaemia, low blood pressure etc). The blood was stored for as long as forty-two days. Only three patients refused continuation of the prograrnme. No major problem was observed during blood donation. One hundred percent of the psedeposited blood units were reinfused and in only 7 patients homologous blood transfusion was required.

Conclusion: The method proved to be simple, safe very well accepted and reduced significantly the need homologous blood transfusion. It should be considered for patients who are to undergo a major Orthopaedic procedure.