In a „true“ valgus knee the lateral femoral condyle is smaller in both the vertical and anteroposterior dimensions and lateral soft tissue structures are contracted. In a „false“ valgus knee there is no mismatch between anteroposterior dimensions of both condyles. The aim of the study was to preoperatively analyse patterns of passive movement of valgus knees with imageless navigation system to optimise surgical approach during subsequent total knee replacement (TKR).

TKR were prospectively performed in 50 valgus knees. After the data registration process, the kinematic analysis was performed by passive movement of the knee. The mechanical axis was recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. The valgus deformity persistent through the whole range of motion was called „true“ and the valgus deformity passing into varus with flexion was called „false“.

The pre-operative valgus deformity in extension ranged from 13° to 4° (mean 7.8°). We observed „true“ valgus type deformity during passive range of movement in 34 cases (68%) and „false“ type of kinematics in 16 cases (32%). The average value of valgus deviation in extension in „true“ group was 7.9° (range 13° to 4°) and in „false“ group 7.5° (range 9° to 6°). The mean difference between axis deviation in 0° to 120° range of flexion was 5.5° (range 10° to 1°) in the „true“ valgus group. In the „false“ valgus group the varus deviation was observed in 90° of flexion in all cases and mean difference between axis deviation in 0° to 120° range of flexion was 12.0° (range 14° to 10°).

Computer navigation can easily help to identify the character of valgus deformity („true“ or „false“) just before skin incision. In „true“ valgus deviation lateral approach may be necessary for appropriate soft tissue balancing during TKR surgery.

The biomechanical function of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains controversial. Some studies report that the AM bundle stabilises the knee joint in anteroposterior (AP) translation and rotational movement (both internal and external) to the same extent as the PL bundle. Others conclude that the PL bundle is more important than the AM in controlling rotational movement.

The objective of this randomised cohort study involving 60 patients (39 men and 21 women) with a mean age of 32.9 years (18 to 53) was to evaluate the function of the AM and the PL bundles of the ACL in both AP and rotational movements of the knee joint after single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a computer navigation system. In the double-bundle group the patients were also randomised to have the AM or the PL bundle tensioned first, with knee laxity measured after each stage of reconstruction. All patients had isolated complete ACL tears, and the presence of a meniscal injury was the only supplementary pathology permitted for inclusion in the trial. The KT-1000 arthrometer was used to apply a constant load to evaluate the AP translation and the rolimeter was used to apply a constant rotational force. For the single-bundle group deviation was measured before and after ACL reconstruction. In the double-bundle group deviation was measured for the ACL-deficient, AM- or PL-reconstructed first conditions and for the total reconstruction.

We found that the AM bundle in the double-bundle group controlled rotation as much as the single-bundle technique, and to a greater extent than the PL bundle in the double-bundle technique. The double-bundle technique increases AP translation and rotational stability in internal rotation more than the single-bundle technique.

Introduction: Large chronic tears of the supra and infraspinatus tendons lead to pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. If conservative treatment fails and repair is impossible, transfer of the latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle can be attempted to substitute for lost of supero-posterior cuff function.

Method: In 2003 nad 2004, twenty five patients with an average age of 54,8 years (range, 51 to 62 years) who had ongoing pain and impaired function underwent the LD transfer after ultrasonographic examination and diagnostic arthroscopy as a primary surgery. The patients were examined at an average of fourteen months (range, twelve to twenty six months) after the operation. The results were assessed with use of Constant-Murley score pre–and postoperatively.

Results: The mean Constant-Murley score increased from 32,50 points preoperatively to 78,75 points postoperatively. The mean score for pain improved of 8,75 points (from 3,75 to 12,50), activities of daily living improved of 10,00 points (from 6,00 to 16,00), range of motion of 15,00 points (from 14,00 to 29,00) and strengh improved of 11,50 points (from 8,75 to 21,25). 20 patients (80%) were very satisfied and 5 patients (20%) were satisfied. The postoperative pain relief was left as the predominant improvement. No patient was disappointed. All patients stated that they would have the operative procedure again under similar circumstances. There was only one complication – subcutaneous haematoma treated with revision and drainage.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that LD transfer is a reasonable approach for salvage of a massive tear of the supero-posterior rotator cuff. Despite the difficult operation technique and long rehabilitation phase, this procedure improves the subjective and objective findings.