The aim of the study was to investigate whether the primary stability of press-fit acetabular components can be improved by altering the impaction procedure. Three impaction procedures were used to implant acetabular components into human cadaveric acetabula using a powered impaction device. An impaction frequency of 1 Hz until complete component seating served as reference. Overimpaction was simulated by adding ten strokes after complete component seating. High-frequency implantation was performed at 6 Hz. The lever-out moment of the acetabular components was used as measure for primary stability. Permanent bone deformation was assessed by comparison of double micro-CT (µCT) measurements before and after impaction. Acetabular component deformation and impaction forces were recorded, and the extent of bone-implant contact was determined from 3D laser scans.Aims
Methods
Precise determination of material loss is essential for failure analysis of retrieved hip cups. To determine wear, the measured geometry of the retrieval hast to be compared to its pristine geometry, which usually is not available. There are different approaches to generate reference geometries to approximate the pristine geometry that is commonly assumed as sphere. However, the geometry of press fit cup retrievals might not be spherical due to deformation caused by excessive press-fitting. The effect of three different reference geometries on the determined wear patterns and material loss of pristine and worn uncemented metal-on-metal hip cups was determined. The surfaces of two cups (ASR, DePuy, Leeds; one pristine, one a worn retrieval) were digitized using a coordinate measurement machine (CRYSTA-Apex S574, Mitutoyo; 3 µm accuracy). Both cups were measured undeformed and while being deformed between a clamp. Three different methods for generating reference geometries were investigated (PolyWorks|Inspector 2018, InnovMetric). Method 1: A sphere with the nominal internal cup dimensions was generated. Method 2: A sphere was fitted to the measured data points after removing those from worn areas (deviation > 3 µm is defined as wear) to eliminate the influence of manufacturing tolerances on the nominal diameter. Method 3: Measurements, which displayed visual deformation in the computed wear pattern based on the best fit sphere, were fitted with an ellipsoid. The direction of the deformation axes and the amount of deformation were used to scale the best fit ellipsoid. Linear wear was calculated from the distance of the respective reference geometry to the measured point cloud. Finally, material loss is defined as the difference in volume of the reference geometry and the measured geometry.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
