To investigate if the countermovement jump height differs between ACL injured and uninjured female adolescents and to explore kinematic differences between limbs. Additionally, the association between isometric knee extension strength and jump height was investigated.

Thirty-one ACL injured female adolescents (ACLi, 15.3 ± 1.4yrs, 163.9 ± 6.6cm, 63.0 ± 9.3kg) and thirty-eight uninjured (CON, 13.2±1.7yrs, 161.7 ± 8.1cm, 50.6 ± 11.1kg) participated in this study. All participants performed a countermovement jump task, with 3D kinematics collected using a motion analysis system (Vicon, Nexus, Oxford, UK) at 200Hz, and a maximum isometric knee extension task on an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, New York, USA) for three trials. The peak torque was extracted from the isometric trials. Independent samples t-test compared the maximum jump height normalised by the dominant leg length between groups, paired samples t-test compared the maximum hip and knee extension and ankle plantar flexion velocities before take-off between limbs in both groups, and a Pearson's correlation test investigated the association between the isometric knee extension strength and jump height.

The ACLi jumped 13% lower compared to the CON (p=0.022). In the ACLi, the maximum hip and knee extension and ankle plantar flexion velocities were greater in the non-injured limb, compared to the injured limb; however, no differences between limbs were found in the CON. The isometric knee extension strength of both limbs was positively correlated with jump height (limb 1: r=0.329; p=0.006, and limb 2: r=0.386; p=0.001; whereas limb 1 corresponds to the ACLi injured limb and CON non-dominant limb, and limb 2 to the ACLi non-injured limb and CON dominant limb).

ACL injured female adolescents present lower jump height than controls and greater contribution of their non-injured limb, compared to their injured limb, during a countermovement jump task. Also, current results indicate that jump height is positively related to isometric knee extension strength measure.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and re-injury rates are high and continue to rise in adolescents. After surgical reconstruction, less than 50% of patients return to their pre-injury level of physical activity. Clearance for return-to-play and rehabilitation progression typically requires assessment of performance during functional tests. Pain may impact this performance. However, the patient's level of pain is often overlooked during these assessments.

Purpose: To investigate the level of pain during functional tests in adolescents with ACL injury.

Fifty-nine adolescents with ACL injury (ACLi; female n=43; 15 ± 1 yrs; 167.6 ± 8.4 cm; 67.8 ± 19.9 kg) and sixty-nine uninjured (CON; female n=38; 14 ± 2 yrs; 165.0 ± 10.8 cm; 54.2 ± 11.5 kg) performed a series of functional tests. These tests included: maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and isokinetic knee flexion-extension strength tests, single-limb hop tests, double-limb squats, countermovement jumps (CMJ), lunges, drop-vertical jumps (DVJ), and side-cuts. Pain was reported on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating no pain and 5 indicating extreme pain for the injured limb of the ACLi group and non-dominant limb for the CON group, after completion of each test. Chi-Square test was used to compare groups for the level of pain in each test. Analysis of the level of pain within and between groups was performed using descriptive statistics.

The distribution of the level of pain was different between groups for all functional tests (p≤0.008), except for ankle plantar flexion and hip abduction MVICs (Table 1). The percentage of participants reporting pain was higher in the ACLi group in all tests compared to the CON group (Figure 1). Participants most often reported pain during the strength tests involving the knee joint, followed by the hop tests and dynamic tasks, respectively. More specifically, the knee extension MVIC was the test most frequently reported as painful (70% of the ACLi group), followed by the isokinetic knee flexion-extension test, with 65% of ACLi group. In addition, among all hop tests, pain was most often reported during the timed 6m hop (53% of ACLi), and, among all dynamic tasks, during the side-cut (40% of ACLi) test (Figure 1). Furthermore, the tests that led to the higher levels of pain (severe or extreme) were the cross-hop (9.8% of ACLi), CMJ (7.1% of ACLi), and the isokinetic knee flexion-extension test (11.5% of ACLi) (Table 1).

Adolescents with and without ACL injury reported different levels of pain for all functional tasks, except for ankle and hip MVICs. The isokinetic knee flexion-extension test resulted in greater rates of severe or extreme pain and was also the test most frequently reported as painful. Functional tests that frequently cause pain or severe level of pain (e.g., timed 6m and cross hops, side-cut, knee flexion/extension MVICs and isokinetic tests) might not be the first test choices to assess function in patients after ACL injury/reconstruction. Reported pain during functional tests should be considered by clinicians and rehabilitation team members when evaluating a patient's readiness to return-to-play.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.