While interdisciplinary protocols and expedited surgical treatment improve the management of hip fractures in the elderly, the impact of such interventions on patients specifically undergoing arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture is not clear. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary protocol for the management of patients with a femoral neck fracture who are treated with an arthroplasty. In 2017, our institution introduced a standardized interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture between July 2012 and March 2020, and compared patient characteristics and outcomes between those treated before and after the introduction of the protocol.Aims
Methods
While interdisciplinary protocols and expedited surgical treatment improve management of geriatric hip fractures, the impact of such interventions on patients undergoing specifically arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) has not been well studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol for patients undergoing arthroplasty for acute FNF. In 2017, our tertiary care institution implemented a standardized interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol. We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for FNF from July 2012 – March 2020, and compared patient characteristics, hospitalization characteristics, and outcomes between those treated before and after protocol implementation.Introduction
Methods
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction
is used to treat patellar instability and recurrent patellar dislocation.
Anatomical studies have found the MPFL to be a double-bundle structure.
We carried out a meta-analysis of studies reporting outcomes of
patellofemoral reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft in
a double-bundle configuration and patellar fixation via mediolateral
patellar tunnels. A literature search was undertaken with no language restriction
in various databases from their year of inception to July 2012.
The primary outcome examined was the post-operative Kujala score.
We identified 320 MPFL reconstructions in nine relevant articles.
The combined mean post-operative Kujala score was 92.02 (standard
error ( Cite this article:
MRSA colonisation increases the risk of acquiring a surgical site infection (SSI). Screening identifies such patients and provides them with suitable eradication treatment prior to surgery to decrease their risk of infection. Our aim was to determine whether receiving effective eradication therapy decreases the risk of infection in a patient previously screening positive for MRSA to that of someone screening negative. 1061 patients underwent elective total knee or hip replacement between March 2008 and July 2010. 1047 had pre-operative screening for MRSA and MSSA using nasal and perineum swabs. If positive for MRSA they underwent a course of eradication treatment and were required to provide a negative swab result prior to undertaking surgery. However during the time of this study those screening positive for MSSA did not receive eradication treatment. Surgical site infections were recorded and the rate of infection, relative risk and odds ration were calculated.Introduction
Methods
The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement consists of a trochlear component and a modular patellar component which has a metal-backed mobile polyethylene bearing. We present the early results of the use of this prosthesis for established isolated patellofemoral arthritis in 51 consecutive patellofemoral replacements in 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 25 months (5 to 60). The estimated survival rate at three years was 63% (95% confidence interval 47 to 80) with revision as the endpoint and 46% (95% confidence interval 30 to 63) with revision and ongoing moderate or severe pain as the endpoint. The early results of the use of the low contact stress patellofemoral replacement are disappointing with a high rate of revision. We cannot therefore recommend its use.
