Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Study design: A prospective comparison of MRI findings with surgical findings in patients presenting to our spinal triage service with a prospective diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation.
Objective: To investigate consistency between radiologists interpretation of MRI scans, and comparison between MRI and surgical findings, in an attempt to identify those patients suitable for percutaneous treatment.
Background: MRI has assumed a preeminent position in the diagnosis of lumbar disc prolapse.
Methods: 87 consecutive patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of a lumbar disc prolapse that underwent an MRI and based on that a discectomy.
Results: Reliability tests show only fair agreement (k=0.36) between the radiologists and at best only moderate agreement (k=0.41) between the radiologists and surgical findings.
Conclusions: MRI is an excellent tool for diagnosis of a disc prolapse but does not appear to help in classifying discs suitable for percutaneous treatment.
Study design: A prospective comparison of MRI findings with surgical findings in patients presenting to our spinal triage service with a prospective diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation.
Objective: To investigate consistency between Radiologists’ interpretation of MRI scans, and comparison between MRI and surgical findings, in an attempt to identify those patients suitable for percutaneous treatment.
Background: MRI has assumed a pre-eminent position in the diagnosis of lumbar disc prolapse.
Methods: 87 consecutive patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of a lumbar disc prolapse that underwent an MRI and based on that a discectomy.
Results Reliability tests show only fair agreement (k=0.36) between the Radiologists and at best only moderate agreement (=0.41) between the Radiologists and surgical findings.
Conclusion: MRI is an excellent tool for diagnosis of a disc prolapse. MRI is poor at defining the character of a disc prolapse, and does not appear to help in classifying discs suitable for percutaneous treatment.