The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized PFC Sigma at fifteen-year follow-up. Between January 2000 and November 2001, two hundred consecutive patients underwent TKA with a rotating-platform, posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with cement. All patients have been followed prospectively and all patients with minimum 12 year follow up were included in this analysis. Forty-nine TKAs were available for our final analysis with a mean follow up of 16.0 years.Background
Methods
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and multiligament knee (MLK) injuries increase the risk of development of knee osteoarthritis and eventual need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are limited data regarding implant use and outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of constrained implants and outcomes among patients undergoing TKA with a history of prior knee ligament reconstruction (PKLR) Patients with a history of ACL or MLK reconstruction who underwent TKA between 2007 and 2017 were identified in a single-institution registry. There were 223 patients who met inclusion criteria (188 ACL reconstruction patients, 35 MLK reconstruction patients). A matched cohort, also of 223 patients, was identified based on patient age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and year of surgery. There were 144 male patients and 79 female patients in both cohorts. Mean age at the time of TKA was 57.2 years (31 to 88). Mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m2 (19.5 to 55.7).Aims
Patients and Methods
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and multiligament knee (MLK) injuries increase the risk of development of knee osteoarthritis and eventual need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is limited data regarding implant use and outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of constrained implants and outcomes among patients undergoing TKA with a history of prior knee ligament reconstruction (PKLR) to a matched cohort of patients undergoing TKA with no history of PKLR. All patients with history of ACL or MLK reconstruction who underwent TKA between 2007–2018 were identified in a single institution registry. A matched cohort was identified based on patient age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and year of surgery. The primary outcome measure was utilization of constrained implants. Secondary outcomes included rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), infection, postoperative transfusion, postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), revision surgery, and patient reported outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for joint replacement (KOOS, JR).Introduction
Methods
In a randomised controlled pragmatic trial we
investigated whether local infiltration analgesia would result in earlier
readiness for discharge from hospital after total knee replacement
(TKR) than patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) plus femoral
nerve block. A total of 45 patients with a mean age of 65 years
(49 to 81) received a local infiltration with a peri-articular injection
of bupivacaine, morphine and methylprednisolone, as well as adjuvant
analgesics. In 45 PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients with a mean
age of 67 years (50 to 84), analgesia included a bupivacaine nerve
block, bupivacaine/hydromorphone PCEA, and adjuvant analgesics.
The mean time until ready for discharge was 3.2 days (1 to 14) in
the local infiltration group and 3.2 days (1.8 to 7.0) in the PCEA+femoral
nerve blockade group. The mean pain scores for patients receiving
local infiltration were higher when walking (p = 0.0084), but there
were no statistically significant differences at rest. The mean
opioid consumption was higher in those receiving local infiltration. The choice between these two analgesic pathways should not be
made on the basis of time to discharge after surgery. Most secondary
outcomes were similar, but PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients
had lower pain scores when walking and during continuous passive
movement. If PCEA+femoral nerve blockade is not readily available, local
infiltration provides similar length of stay and similar pain scores
at rest following TKR. Cite this article:
There has been a recent increase in interest
for non-cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however
the superiority of cement fixation is an ongoing debate. Whereas the results based on Level III and IV evidence show similar
survivorship rates between the two types of fixation, Level I and
II evidence strongly support cemented fixation. United Kingdom,
Australia, Sweden, and New Zealand registry data show lower failure
rates and greater usage of cemented than non-cemented fixation.
Case series studies have also indicated greater functional outcomes
and lower revision rates among cemented TKAs. Non-cemented fixation
involves more patellofemoral complications, including increased
susceptibility to wear due to a thinner polyethylene bearing on
the cementless metal-backed component. The combination of results
from registry data, prospective randomised studies, and meta-analyses
support the current superiority of cemented fixation in TKAs.
