This study sought to evaluate the patient experience and short-term clinical outcomes associated with the hospital stay of patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These results were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent TKA without robotic assistance performed by the same surgeon. A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis by a single fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon over a 39-month period was identified. Patients who underwent TKA during the year this surgeon transitioned his entire knee arthroplasty practice to robotic assistance were excluded to eliminate selection bias and control for the learning curve. A final population of 538 TKAs was identified. Of these, 314 underwent TKA without robotic assistance and 224 underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA. All patients received the same prosthesis and post-operative pain protocol. Patient demographic characteristics and short-term clinical data were analyzed.Introduction
Methods
As a new generation of robotic systems is introduced into the world of arthroplasty, Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) represents a growing proportion of a reconstructive surgeon's operative volume. This study aims to compare the post-operative readmission rate, pain scores, costs, as well as the effects on surgeon efficiency one year after adoption of these technologies into clinical practice. A retrospective chart review was conducted regarding all conventional and robotic-assisted TKAs performed by a single surgeon in the year following January 1, 2017, the date MAKO Robotic-Assisted TKAs were introduced at our intuition. All patients over age 18 with a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent TKA during this period were identified. Records were analyzed for differences in readmission, pain scores, tourniquet time, and operating room charges.Background/Introduction
Methods
Given the increasing prevalence of hip and knee arthroplasties performed, measures have been implemented to standardize care and effectively improve patient outcomes and decrease costs. Length of stay (LOS) directly affects costs. The purpose of this study was to identify peri-operative and patient related factors that correlated with decreased or increased LOS. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 289 consecutive primary total knee (TKA) and total hip (THA) arthroplasties. Comorbidities indicated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), smoking and drinking status, age and BMI were recorded. Intraoperative and post-operative records were reviewed for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score, anesthetic type, regional nerve blocks, and blood transfusions. The TKA cohort consisted of 57 males and 86 females, while the THA cohort consisted of 73 males and 73 females.Introduction
Methods & Materials
Readmission after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) places a great burden on the health care system. As reimbursement systems place increased emphasis on quality measures such as readmission rates, understanding the causes for readmission becomes increasingly important. We queried an electronic database for all patients who underwent THA or TKA at our institution from 2006 through 2010. We identified those who had been readmitted within 90 days of discharge from the initial admission. We then collected clinical and demographic data as well as readmission diagnoses by ICD-9 code. We compared rates of readmission using chi-squared test.Introduction
Methods
Readmission after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) places a great burden on the health care system. As reimbursement systems place increased emphasis on quality measures such as readmission rates, identifying and understanding the most common drivers for readmission becomes increasingly important. We queried an electronic database for all patients who underwent THA or TKA at our institution from 2006 through 2010. We identified those who were readmitted within 90 days of discharge from the initial admission and set this as our outcome variable. We then reviewed demographic and clinical data such as age, index procedure, length of stay (LOS), readmission diagnosis, co-morbidities and payer group and set these as our variables of interest. We used chi-square tests to characterize and summarize the patient data and logistic regression analyses to predict the relative likelihood of patient readmission based on our control variables. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05.Introduction
Methods
Joint reconstruction remains a successful and popular surgery with advances in approaches, implants and techniques continually forthcoming. Various methods of skin closure exist to address issues in efficiency, aesthetics, and barrier to infection. While subcuticular skin closure techniques offer an aesthetic advantage to conventional skin stapling, no measurable differences have been reported. Furthermore, newer barbed sutures, such as the V-loc absorbable suture, A retrospective chart review was conducted of 278 consecutive primary joint reconstruction cases performed by a single surgeon in 12 months from July 2009 through June 2010. Pre-operative history & physical reports were evaluated for co-morbidities (i.e diabetes mellitus), smoking status and body mass index (BMI). Operative dictations by the attending surgeon provided information on the surgical procedure, use of drain, wound closure technique and type of suture/staple used for skin closure. Skin was closed by the primary surgeon and his chief resident. Wounds were closed via staple gun or subcuticular stitch (3-0 Biosyn vs V-Loc) in a consecutive manner, depending on the surgeon's preference in that period. Post-operative clinic notes were reviewed to determine the occurrence of wound complications, issuance of antibiotic prescriptions, or return to the operating room. The cohort consisted of 106 males and 161 females at an average age of 63 years (range: 18–92). Overall, there were 153 procedures at the knee (including TKA, uni-compartmental arthroplasty, patello-femoral arthroplasty) and 125 procedures at the hip (including THA and hemi-arthroplasty).Introduction
Methods & Materials
The published results of the use of a dual mobility cup to prevent instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have established its efficacy. However, the monoblock, porous cobalt chromium cup design makes secure fixation difficult to achieve, limiting its use in patients with significant acetabular deformity or bone loss. Recently, a modular version of the dual mobility cup was introduced, consisting of a conventional porous shell with holes to allow augmented screw fixation, a highly polished modular metal liner, and a standard bipolar femoral head. The purpose of this report is to present its various indications, the surgical technique, and report our initial results. With IRB approval and FDA clearance, we implanted the modular dual mobility (MDM) cup in 15 patients undergoing primary and 5 patients undergoing revision THA deemed high risk for instability. Indications included septic and aseptic revision surgery, developmental hip dysplasia, avascular necrosis, recurrent dislocations, hemiarthroplasty conversion to THA, periprosthetic fracture, abductor insufficiency requiring augmented repair, and hypermobility from auto-immune inflammatory disease.Introduction
Methods
Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty has been demonstrated to provide reproducible limb mechanical alignment within three degrees from the neutral mechanical axis. However, restoring proper implant and extremity alignment remains a significant challenge with proximal tibial deficiencies. In this prospective study, we describe the use of computer navigation to quantify the amount of bone loss on the medial or lateral tibial plateau and the use of this data to assess the need for augmentation with metallic tibial wedges. In this study, we demonstrate that CAS TKR in patients with significant tibial deformities can accurately measure severe tibial deformities, predict tibial augment thickness, and provide excellent mechanical alignment and restore the joint line without excessive bony resection, repeated osteotomies, and repeated augment trialing.
