The aim of this study is to investigate whether MoM implants result in more chromosome aberrations and increased blood metal ions postoperatively whe compared to MoP implants.

MoM arthroplasties are being inserted in increasing numbers of younger patients due to the increased durability and reduced requirements for revision in these implants. Recent studies have raised many concerns over possible genotoxicity of MoM implants.

This is a prospective study of patients who have undergone elective total hip replacement, they were selected and then randomised into two groups. Group A received a MoP implant and group B received a MoM implant. Patients are reviewed pre-operatively (control group), at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. On each occasion blood tests are taken to quantify metal ion levels (chromium, cobalt, titanium, nickel and vanadium) using HR-ICPMS method and chromosome aberrations in T lymphocytes using 24 colour fluorescent in situ hydridisation (FISH).

51 patients have been recruited to date, 23 of whom had MoP prosthesis and 28 a MoM. 47 of these had their 1 year follow-up with blood analysis and 38 have had 2 year follow up. There appeared to be a bedding period for both MoM and MoP groups, with an increase in metal ion release. The blood concentration of chromium, cobalt and titanium rise significantly in the MoM group at the 2 year stage. Chromosome aberrations occurred in both groups. Both the MoM and MoP groups showed increase frequency of aneuploidy aberrations and structural damage. The greatest increase in metal ion levels occurred at the 1 to 2 year interval corresponding to significant rise in chromosome aberrations.

Preliminary results of this study show that the levels of chromium, cobalt and titanium are significantly higher in the MoM group compared to the MoP group. This corresponds to increases in chromosome aberrations in the groups with increases in structural chromosome damage after two years.

Articular cartilage implantation (ACI) and associated procedures (MACI = Matrix-assisted cartilage implantation) are now established treatments for osteochondral defects in the knee. The quality of repair in terms of histological appearance is frequently not known, whilst the correlation of histology results with functional outcomes remains undefined. Histological data of the quality of the repair tissue is sparse and a precise classification proved difficult.

This was a single-centre, prospective study. Over 12 years (1998-2010) 406 patients that underwent articular cartilage implantation procedures at our institution (ACI = 170, MACI = 205) had biopsies taken at the 1-2 year interval, in order to assess whether these contained ‘hyaline-like’ cartilage, ‘mixed hyaline-like with fibrocartilage’, fibrocartilage or fibrous tissue alone.

Histological sections of the biopsies were prepared and stained with haematoxylin, eosin and proteoglycan stains and viewed under polarised light. All biopsies were studied by a single histopathologist in a specialist, dedicated musculoskeletal laboratory.

All patients were assessed by the Cincinnati, Bentley and Visual Analogue scores both pre-operatively and at the time of the review.

The findings revealed that 56 patients healed with ‘hyaline-like’ cartilage (14.9%), 103 with ‘mixed’ (27.5%), 179 with fibrocartilage (47.7%) and 37 with fibrous tissue (9.9%).

These findings showed that 42.4% of defects were filled with ‘hyaline-like’ or ‘mixed’ cartilage, with 70% of these achieving a ‘fair’ to ‘excellent’ functional outcome. This was also observed in the fibrocartilage group, where 72% achieved similar results. Predictably 89% of the patients that healed by fibrous tissue had a poor functional outcome.

This study shows that 71% of patients whose osteochondral defects healed by either ‘hyaline-like’, ‘mixed’ or fibrocartilage experienced an improvement in the function. In contrast, only 11% of the patients whose defects filled with fibrous tissue, showed some functional improvement. Additionally, this data indicates the advantage of biopsies in assessing the overall results of cartilage implantation procedures.