header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Sep 2021
Abdalla M Nyanzu M Fenner C Fragkakis E Ajayi B Lupu C Bishop T Bernard J Willis F Reyal Y Pereira E Papadopoulos M Crocker M Lui D
Full Access

Introduction

Spine is a common site for haematological malignancies. Multiple myeloma affects the spine in 70% of cases. New guidelines were published in 2015 to help manage spinal haematological malignancies.

Despite neural compression or spinal instability, instrumentation of the spine should be avoided. Surgery carries significant risks of wound complications and more importantly delaying the definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cement augmentation and bracing for pain and prevention of deformity is key to the new strategies.

We aimed to evaluate the different treatment modalities adopted in the spine unit at St George's hospital for spinal haematological malignancies. We compared our practice to the current guidelines published in 2015.

Methods

Retrospective review of all spinal haematological malignancy patients who were discussed in the spinal MDT and managed through the spine unit at St George's hospital in the period between April 2019 and February 2021. We analysed the demographics of the patients treated in this period and compared the management modalities adopted in the unit to the current British haematological guidelines.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 107 - 107
1 Apr 2019
Harold R De Candida Soares Pereira E Cavalcante E Da Silveira Barros MPM De Souza SNM Brander V Stulberg SD
Full Access

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful procedure, yet access to arthroplasty is limited in many developing nations. In response, organizations around the world have conducted service trips to provide international arthroplasty care to underserved populations. Little outcomes data are currently available related to these trips. We present a 1-year follow up.

Methods

We completed an arthroplasty service trip to Brazil in 2017 where we performed 46 THAs on 38 patients. Patient demographic data, comorbidity profile, complication data, and pre- and postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Short Form Pain (SF-Pain), PROMIS Short Form Physical Function (SF-Function), and HOOS Jr scores were collected. Outcomes were collected postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks and 1 year. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations between patient factors and 12-week outcomes.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 43 - 43
1 Apr 2018
Harold R Edelstein A De Candida Soares Pereira E Cavalcante E Da Silveira Barros MPM De Souza SNM Brander V Julio S Stulberg S
Full Access

Background

Total hip replacement is a highly successful procedure, yet access to arthroplasty is limited in many developing nations. In response, organizations in the United States have conducted service trips to provide international arthroplasty care to underserved populations. Little outcomes data are currently available related to these trips. We aimed to assess patient outcomes following total hip arthroplasty performed on a surgical mission trip.

Methods

We completed an arthroplasty service trip to Brazil during which we performed 46 total hip arthroplasties (THA) on 38 patients. Patient demographic data, comorbidity profile, complication data, and pre- and postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Short Form Pain (SF-Pain), PROMIS Short Form Physical Function (SF-Function), and HOOS Jr scores were collected. Baseline and final follow-up scores were compared. In addition, we utilized a novel questionnaire that was designed to determine outcomes most relevant to patients receiving joint replacements in developing countries. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations between patient factors and outcomes.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 9 - 9
1 Apr 2012
Leach J Hempenstall J Pereira E Cadoux-Hudson T
Full Access

To define how pre-operative evaluation guides surgical planning in patients with atlanto-axial subluxation secondary to rheumatoid arthritis and to measure clinical outcome for the same group.

Prospective evaluation of a consecutive cohort of 26 patients undergoing C1/2 fusion over 5 years (2004-2009).

Pre-operative evaluation of posterior atlanto-dens interval (PADI), C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle dimensions.

Pre- and post-op Ranawat scores and visual analogue scores for neck and C2 pain

C1/2 instability resulted from rheumatoid arthritis (21), trauma (4) and infection (1).

C1 lateral mass mean height 4.4mm, C2 pedicle mean height 5.1mm and mean width 3.4mm (30% width <3mm).

Ranawat scale improved Grade II to Grade I (p=0.07). Neck pain (pre-op mean 5.5, s.d. 2.8; post-op mean 1.6, s.d. 2.1, t<0.05) and C2 pain (pre-op mean 2.1, s.d. 3.3; post-op mean 0.5, s.d. 1.2, t<0.05) improved.

No instrumentation failure. In the rheumatoid group, 17/21 patients had C1 lateral mass and C1/2 transarticular screws. 1 patient had a cranio-cervical fusion and 3 patients had other constructs.

3 patients had C2 numbness. No other neurological deficit.

In a rheumatoid population, pre-operative evaluation often precludes the use of C2 pedicle screws. Rigid fixation with a C1 lateral mass and C1/2 transarticular polyaxial screw-rod system is associated with good clinical outcomes.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 379 - 379
1 Jul 2010
Leach J Pereira E Chandran H Cadoux-Hudson T
Full Access

Purpose of study: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy 3 and 4-level ACDF with stand-alone (no additional anterior fixation) intervertebral cages.

Methods and results: A consecutive cohort of 19 patients undergoing 3 (n=15) and 4-level (n=4) ACDF with Solis cages over 4 years was studied (mean follow-up 24 months). Outcome measures were clinical (VAS scores for neck and arm pain, myelopathy scores) and radiological (disc height, kyphotic angles, fusion).

Neck pain scores improved from 5.1 pre-operatively (range 0–10, s.d. 4) to 2.8 post-operatively (range 0–10, s.d.5), t=3.7, P< 0.0002.

Arm pain scores improved from 5.3 pre-operatively (range 0–10, s.d. 5) to 2.5 post-operatively (range 0–8, s.d. 3), t=2.8, P< 0.009.

Pre-operative myelopathy scores averaged 10.6 (range 7–16, s.d. 4.7) rising to 12.8 post-operatively (range 10–17, s.d. 3.9). Although there was no statistically significant change in myelopathy scores, no patient experienced a worsening of their myelopathy score after surgery.

There were no operative complications. Radiological follow-up demonstrated early improvement in disc space heights (pre-op 3.1 mm, range 1–6 mm; post-op 5.6 mm, range 4–9 mm) but, at 12 months, two patients demonstrated asymptomatic evidence of cage settling and loss of disc height. There was no incidence of pseudarthrosis. No patient has thus far required further surgery.

Conclusion: Multi-level cervical disc disease can be managed safely and effectively by 3 or 4-level discectomy and fusion with stand-alone intervertebral cages.

Ethics approval: None – audit

Interest Statement: None