Infection after total knee replacement, which is a serious and expensive complication, often represent a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The current incidence of infection after the primary procedure is 1 to 3%, depending on the published series. A correct and timely diagnosis, classification between early and delayed infection, and which microorganisms are involved, are crucial steps in defining prevention and treatment strategies. Determination of the annual and three years incidence of infection after primary total knee replacement; evaluation of the microorganisms involved and its resistance patterns; assessment of treatment – surgical approach and selection of antibiotics. Collection of clinical and laboratorial data of all patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty between 2011 and 2013 in our hospital; definition of periprosthesic infection cases following the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. During the study period, 526 primary knee replacements were performed in 521 patients; with 41 patients having bilateral replacements. The mean follow-up period was 30 months; 5 patients had no follow up and 1 died in the post operatory. We reported 9 prosthetic infections, of which 2 did not reached the MSIS criteria, but were also considered based on high clinical suspicion. The majority of the cases (6) were delayed infections. The calculated 3 year incidence of infection after primary knee replacement was 1,6%, with annual rates of 3,0% (2011), 1,7% (2012) and 0,9% (2013). The microorganisms isolated were as follows: Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, resistant to penicillin; Streptococcus agalactiae and one isolate of Serratia marcescens, both showing multiple antibiotic resistances. Only one case was treated with surgical debridement and conservation of prosthesis, in the other 8 cases a two-stage implant revision procedure was performed. The antibiotics selected were vancomycin, fluoroquinolones and association of gentamicin and clindamycin. Our local infection rates are in line with the published series from reference surgical centers. The annual incidence is decreasing, probably because the majority of our infection cases are delayed (recent years, shorter follow up period) and our preventive measures are improving. The microorganisms identified are also in agreement with published data, and our antibiotic resistance pattern is a valuable information to consider in a first empirical approach. Treatment options suitable to each case, and antibiotic protocols need to be improved in our local practice. Preventive measures in delayed infections are still under debate, and represent another future challenge.
Assessment of skeletal age is important in children’s
orthopaedics. We compared two simplified methods used in the assessment
of skeletal age. Both methods have been described previously with
one based on the appearance of the epiphysis at the olecranon and
the other on the digital epiphyses. We also investigated the influence
of assessor experience on applying these two methods. Our investigation was based on the anteroposterior left hand
and lateral elbow radiographs of 44 boys (mean: 14.4; 12.4 to 16.1
) and 78 girls (mean: 13.0; 11.1 to14.9) obtained during the pubertal
growth spurt. A total of nine observers examined the radiographs
with the observers assigned to three groups based on their experience (experienced,
intermediate and novice). These raters were required to determined
skeletal ages twice at six-week intervals. The correlation between
the two methods was determined per assessment and per observer groups. Interclass
correlation coefficients (ICC) evaluated the reproducibility of
the two methods. The overall correlation between the two methods was r = 0.83
for boys and r = 0.84 for girls. The correlation was equal between
first and second assessment, and between the observer groups (r ≥ 0.82).
There was an equally strong ICC for the assessment effect (ICC ≤ 0.4%)
and observer effect (ICC ≤ 3%) for each method. There was no significant
(p <
0.05) difference between the levels of experience. The two methods are equally reliable in assessing skeletal maturity.
The olecranon method offers detailed information during the pubertal
growth spurt, while the digital method is as accurate but less detailed,
making it more useful after the pubertal growth spurt once the olecranon
has ossified. Cite this article:
The ideal treatment for traumatic anterior dislocation
of the shoulder in the skeletally immature patient is controversial.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes after either conservative
and/or surgical treatment using the Latarjet technique. A retrospective
series of 49 out of 80 patients were reviewed. We found no significant differences
between either treatment method regarding functional scores and
pain levels. Although not statistically significant, post-surgical
patients showed better signs of shoulder stability than others who
have a higher rate of recurrence. Further, 92% of the post-surgical
group had returned to the same level of activity Cite this article:
