Avulsion of the proximal hamstring tendon origin can result in significant functional impairment, with surgical re-attachment of the tendons becoming an increasingly recognized treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of surgical management of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions, and to compare the results between acute and chronic repairs, as well as between partial and complete injuries. PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTdiscuss, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched. Studies were screened and quality assessed.Aims
Methods
The 2020 London International Hamstring Consensus meeting was convened to improve our understanding and treatment of hamstring injuries. The multidisciplinary consensus panel included 14 International specialists on the management of hamstring injuries. The Delphi consensus process consisted of two rounds of surveys which were completed by 19 surgeons from a total of 106 participants. Consensus on individual statements was regarded as over 70% agreement between panel members. The consensus group agreed that the indications for operative intervention included the following: gapping at the zone of injury (86.9%); high functional demands of the patient (86.7%); symptomatic displaced bony avulsions (74.7%); and proximal free tendon injuries with functional compromise refractory to non-operative treatment (71.4%). Panel members agreed that surgical intervention had the capacity to restore anatomy and function, while reducing the risk of injury recurrence (86.7%). The consensus group did not support the use of corticosteroids or endoscopic surgery without further evidence. These guidelines will help to further standardise the treatment of hamstring injuries and facilitate decision-making in the surgical treatment of these injuries.
The total number of knees affected was 98. The mean number of compartments affected was 1.2 with the medial and patellofemoral compartment most affected. The mean number of classes attended was 8.3. Pre-intervention, the mean WOMAC score was 64.7 and the mean Oxford knee score was 31.9. Post-intervention at a mean follow up of 12 months (range 7 – 22 months), the mean WOMAC score was 29.4 and the mean Oxford knee score 22.4. The change in scores following intervention was statistically significant (p <
0.05). Of the cohort, 9 patients were subsequently offered or went on to have knee joint arthroplasty.