Lisfranc joint injuries account for only 0.2% of all fractures but early diagnosis improves the chances of a better outcom]. Radiographic signs, such as diastasis (>2mm) of the 1–2 interspace, are subtle and. often missed, leading to a poorer outcome. We present a new radiographic sign, less likely to result in missed diagnoses. Null nypothesis: The intermetarsal angle remains unchanged in Lisfranc injuries. A series of radiographs demonstrating Lisfranc injury were interspersed with normal and postoperative cases. Evidence of fixation was obscured. A selection of Foundation and Core Trainee medical staff measured the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) on two separate occasions. The measuring technique was demonstrated with no explanation for the reason behind the measurement.Introduction
Method
The aim of our study was to assess the ability of orthopaedic surgical trainees to adequately assess ankle radiographs following operative fixation of unstable ankle fracture. We identified 26 Supination-External rotation (SER) stage IV fractures, and 4 Pronation-External rotation (PER) stage III fractures treated surgically in our institution. Radiographs were evaluated for shortening of the fibula, widening of the joint space, malrotation of the fibula and widening of the medial clear space. Trainees were shown these radiographs and asked to comment on the adequacy of reduction. They were then given a simple tutorial on assessing adequacy of reduction and asked to reassess these radiographs. The parameters discussed included assessment of medial clear space, drawing of the tibiofibular line, use of the “circle sign” and measurement of the talocrural angle. There was a statistically significant improvement from 64% to 71.4% (P< 0.05) in the radiographs correctly assessed by orthopaedic trainees following a short tutorial on radiographical assessment.Background
Methods and results
There is very limited literature available on the use of prosthetic replacement in the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the radius. In the past these were treated with vascularised and non-vascularised autografts which had associated donor site morbidity, problems of non union, graft or junctional fractures and delayed return to function. Our study is a mid to long term follow-up of implant survivorship and the functional outcome of metal prosthetic replacement used for primary and metastatic lesions of radius. We had 15 patients (8 males:7 females) with a mean age of 53 years. 8 patients underwent proximal radial replacement, 2 with mid-shaft radial replacement and 6 patients had distal radial replacements with wrist arthrodesis. The indications for replacement included metastatic lesions from renal cell carcinoma, primary giant cell tumours, ewings' sarcoma, chondroblastoma, radio-ulnar synostosis and benign fibrous histiocytoma. The average follow up was 5 years and 6 months (range 3 months - 18 years). Four patients died as a result of dissemination of renal cell carcinoma and two patients were lost to follow-up. There were no complications with the prosthesis or infection. Clinically and radiographically there was no loosening demonstrated at 18 years with secure fixation of implants. Two patients developed interossoeus nerve palsies which partially recovered. Functional outcomes of the elbow were assessed using the Mayo performance score with patients achieving a mean score of 85 postoperatively (range 65-95). All but one patient had full range of motion of the elbow. The patient with radio-ulnar synostosis had a 25 degree fixed flexion pot-operatively. Although the distal radial replacements had decreased range of movements of the wrist due to arthrodesis, they had excellent functional outcomes. Only one patient required revision surgery due to post-traumatic loosening of the implant. Our results of the use of endoprosthetic replacement of radius in the treatment of tumours are encouraging with regards to survivorship of the implant and functional outcome. This type of treatment results in an early return to daily routine activties, good functional outcome and patient satisfaction.
We report the initial 2 and 3 year follow-up results of this randomised controlled trial of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) using porcine-derived collagen membrane as a cover (ACI-C) versus matrix-carried autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee. 217 patients were randomised to have either ACI (92 patients) or MACI (125 patients). The mean age in each group was 35.1 and 33 years respectively. There were equal proportion of males and females and there was no difference in the size of lesions in each of the treatment groups. One year following surgery, patients underwent check arthroscopy (with or without biopsy) to assess the graft. Functional assessment was performed yearly by using the Modified Cincinatti Knee score, the SF-36 score, the Bentley Functional Rating Score and the Visual Analogue Score.Introduction
Methods
We report on minimum 2 year follow-up results of 71 patients randomised to autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) using porcine-derived collagen membrane as a cover (ACI-C) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee. ACI is used widely as a treatment for symptomatic chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. Variations of the original periosteum-cover technique include the use of porcine-derived type I/type III collagen as a cover (ACI-C) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) using a collagen bilayer seeded with chondrocytes.Purpose
Introduction
Endoprosthetic reconstruction is an established method of treatment for primary bone tumours in children. Traditionally these were implanted with cemented intramedullary fixation. Hydroxyapatite collars at the shoulder of the implant are now standard on all extremity endoprostheses, but older cases were implanted without collars. Uncemented intramedullary fixation with hydroxyapatite collars has also been used in an attempt to reduce the incidence of problems such as aseptic loosening. Currently there are various indications that dictate which method is used. To establish long term survivorship of cemented versus uncemented endoprosthesis in paediatric patients with primary bone tumours.Background
Aims
