Purpose of the study: Several series have been reported on arthroscopic treatment of anterior instability. Few authors have focused on patient outcome after recurrent instability following arthroscopic stabilisation. Did these patients undergo revision surgery? What proportion? What were the results of secondary surgical coracoids block?

Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 53 failures after arthroscopic stabilisation collected among a cohort of 182 patients who underwent surgery in our institution between 1988 and 2006. At last follow-up, shoulder function was noted using the Walch-Duplay score. The degree of joint degenerative disease was noted on the radiographs using the Samilson classification.

Results: Mean time to recurrence after arthroscopic stabilisation was 21 months (range 3–114). Patients were reviewed at mean 68 months. Twenty-four patients (45%° had not had revision surgery: 17 (32%) had declined a new operation and 7 (13%) had a unique episode of instability. Twenty-nine patients (55%) had revision surgery: 27 underwent an open procedure in our institution for a coracoids block. The revision was performed in another institution for two patients who were excluded from the analysis. Mean time between the two operations was 29 months. At last follow-up, 89% of the reoperated patients were satisfied. The mean Walch-Duplay score was 83.6/100 (activity=18.5; stability=15.9; pain=23.9; mobility=24.2). The Duplay score was 100 for 48% of the reoperated patients; 41% had persistent apprehension. Three patients (11%) developed recurrent dislocation at a mean 23 months (19–29). Among the 53 patients included in the study, 26% had moderate osteoarthritic lesions (Samilson 1 or 2). The reoperated patients were free of such lesions. Hyperlaxity, age, and sport practiced did not have any impact on surgical revision.

Discussion: In this overall series of 53 patients, 20 (37%) retained an unstable shoulder. Among them, 17 had declined new surgery. Eleven percent of the reoperated patients developed subsequent recurrence. This rate is higher than after first-intention blocks. Published series of arthroscopic revisions reported a higher recurrence rate (Kim, Arthroscopy 2002: 21 % recurrence; Neri, JSES 2007: 27 % recurrence).

Conclusion: The Latarjet block is the treatment of choice after failure of arthroscopic stabilisation, despite a high recurrence rate.

Purpose of the study: There are several goals for the treatment of septic nonunion of the leg: control the infection, achieve healing, preserve function. The purpose of this work was to report the results obtained with a two-phase technique using a cement spacer.

Material and method: From 1994 to 2007, 27 patients were treated for a septic nonunion of the tibia (19 proven, 8 suspected). There were 22 women and 5 men, mean age 39 years (range 16–66). The first phase of the surgical technique involved “cancerological” cleaning and insertion of an antibiotic cement spacer. Osteosynthesis was performed if necessary. Antibiotics were adapted to sample results. The second phase involved an autologous bone graft with osteosynthesis after biological markers had returned to normal and an antibiotic window. Antibiotics were then discontinued if samples were negative. Patients were reviewed with physical examination, radiology, and laboratory tests at one year.

Results: Mean follow-up was 4 years (range 1–11). At the first phase, mean bone defect after cleaning was 5 cm (range 3–8); osteosynthesis procedures were required for 22 patients (81.5%), mainly with plate fixation. Mean time to the second phase was 4 months (range 1.5–22). At the second phase, bone loss was filled with isolated bone fragments (44%) or associated with a tricortical graft (52%) or a plate nail combination (37%). Bacteriological samples were negative for 25 patients after the second phase. Six patients required surgical revision for recurrent aseptic non-union (22%).

Discussion: All patients healed at mean one year with a tolerable misalignment in 37%. At last follow-up there were no cases of infection. Nineteen patients had residual stiffness of the ankle or knee but 80% had resumed their sports activities and 85% their occupational activities.

Conclusion: A two-phase surgical treatment of septic non-union of the leg is effective. We were able o achieve cure of the infection in all patients with per primam healing in 78% in addition to an acceptable functional outcome. The spacer offers the advantage of preparing a bed for the graft and preserving autonomy between the two phases.

Purpose of the study: The PFM-R (Zimmer) prosthesis is a straight modular stem made of sanded titanium designed to favour spontaneous bone reconstruction. The purpose of this work was to analyse the clinical and radiographic results of this implant.

Material and methods: This was a consecutive prospective series of 154 patients who underwent surgery from 1998 to 2007 (15 first-intention prostheses and 139 revisions for severe loosening [Paprosky stages 3 and 4]). Revision included a clinical evaluation (PMA score) and radiographic assessment (migration, bone regeneration, stress shielding, osteointegration, Le Béguec score) as well as a survival analysis.

Results: At mean 4.6 years follow-up (1–10 years), three patients had died, two were lost to follow-up and 18 implants were removed, 11 for infection, six for migration and one for defective technique. The PMA score improved from 8 (0–16) to 15.8 (5–18). Mean pivot impaction was 4 mm (0–50), statistically dependent on initial bone stock, form of the isthma, the corticomedullary index in the implantation zone, length of anchor, and time to weight bearing, but not femorotomy nor zone of primary stability. Bone stock was good in 73% at poor in 27% (15 stress shielding, nine infectious osteolysis, 16 absence of bone regeneration). Stress shielding was related to length and diameter of the implanted pivot (p< 0.05). Bone regrowth was statistically dependent on the number of prior operations, type of stem explanted (cemented), initial bone stock, form of the isthma and quality of the surgical reconstruction. The implant was osteointegrated in 128 cases (86%). The analysis of the prosthetic anchoring showed that primary stability was mainly diaphyseal (90%) then secondarily global (83%). Osteointegration depended statistically on the number of prior operations, initial bone stock, form of the isthma and bone regrowth, but not femorotomy. The overall Le Béquec score reached 14.7 (2–20) at last follow-up.

Discussion: The PFM-R enabled bone regeneration and osteointegration in the majority of patients. The quality of the femoral reconstruction around the implant appears to be fundamental. Massive stems should be avoided as they lead to stress shielding. The limits for use of this implant are osteopenia and absence of an isthma.