Most hospitals have introduced digital radiography (PACS) systems. Accurate pre-operative templating prior to hip arthroplasty requires precise information on the magnification of the digital image. Without this information the benefits of expensive digital templating programs (Orthoview-£10000) cannot be realised. To determine the magnification of a digital image involves the placement of a “calibration object” at the level of the hip joint. This is unpopular with patients and radiographers alike. We describe a method that requires a single measurement to be made from the greater trochanter to the digital film. An AP pelvis x-ray was taken of 50 patients with hip replacements. The “predicted” magnification was calculated using the new method. As the size of the head of the prosthesis was known the “actual” magnification could be calculated also. There was no significant difference at 0.05, Wilcoxon T, 2-tail test. Conventional radiography, which assumes a magnification of 20%, results in errors up to 11%. Templating may therefore predict an incorrectly sized prosthesis. Our method is as accurate as methods using a calibration object whilst being acceptable to patients and staff. Its use should lead to more accurate pre-operative templating prior to total hip arthroplasty
Restriction of straight leg raising (SLR) is usually associated with patients suffering leg pain due to a postero-lateral disc protrusion. We report a group of twelve patients presenting with acute mechanical low back pain only, and no leg pain, who also demonstrated similar restriction of SLR. The MRI scans of these patients, when compared with the scans of patients suffering typical sciatic pain, revealed that the disc protrusions in the back pain group were more likely to be smaller, central and at a higher lumbar level than the leg pain group. Anatomical considerations would suggest that the source of back pain was the anterior theca being compressed by a central disc protrusion.
In a prospective study we attempted to define the role of lumbar discography in the investigation of patients with low back pain with or without non-dermatomal pain in the lower limb. The records of 195 patients were studied at least two years after a technically successful operation. Of 137 patients in whom discography had revealed disc disease and provoked symptoms, 89% derived significant and sustained clinical benefit from operation. Of 25 patients whose discs showed morphological abnormality but had no provocation of symptoms on discography only 52% had clinical success. These findings support the continued use of lumbar discography for the investigation of this particular group of patients.