The significance of matching radius of curvature of the radial head implant and the capitellum in implant selection is evaluated. A mismatch of radius of curvature could lead to point loading, reducing contact area, creating large contact stresses, resulting in arthritis, pain, and other complications. Radial head (RH) implant size is chosen by reconstruction outside of the radiocapitellar joint capsule measuring the RH diameter and length, which is replicated for implant selection. RH radius of curvature (RC) is rarely part of the decision although important in determining contact area.Summary
Introduction
Increased lateral ulnotrochlear joint space due to improper sizing in radial head arthroplasty may result in medial collateral ligament laxity, leading to increased osteophytes and arthritis. Radial head (RH) arthroplasty is a common response to comminuted RH fractures. Typical complications include improper sizing, leading to changes in joint kinematics. Evidence of these changes should be visible through fluoroscopic images of affected joints. The two examined changes in this study are the ulnar deviation from distal radial translation (DRT), and the widening of the lateral ulnotrochlear joint space (LUT).Summary
Introduction
Consistent load distributions with over-sizing of radial head implants show minimal variance in interosseus ligament (IOL) and triangular-fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tension, both of which are essential in distribution of load at the elbow. Introduction:Changes in loading distribution at the elbow have not been studied with radial head (RH) arthroplasty. Difficulty arises concerning distribution variability between loading methods and magnitudes, and with implant oversizing. RC joint capsule were exposed using the Kocher approach in seven fresh-frozen cadaver Humeri. Specimens were loaded axially in an MTS machine with humeri at 90° and wrist neutral. The arms were cycled in load control between 13N–130N until steady-state was reached for each trial. After loading in neutral, the arms were rotated to 60° supination (60S) and 60° pronation (60P), the test repeated. The radial head was excised and Co-Cr implant inserted. Sizings 0mm, +2mm, +4mm were simulated using 2mm plastic spacers on the stem. A Tekscan pressure map transducer at RC recorded loading. The recorded Tekscan loads were organised according to sizing (native, 0mm, +2mm, +4mm) for each specimen. The max/min load values were recorded and the difference, ΔL was calculated. The Max and ΔL values from each sizing were percentage paired with the respective native value. The ΔL values were used to discern load distribution. A linear regression was done using the RC loading plotted against the applied load to visualise the change of load distribution with changing applied loads. Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.Summary
Method
