Accurate orientation of the acetabular component during a total hip replacement is critical for optimising patient function, increasing the longevity of components, and reducing the risk of complications. This study aimed to determine the validity of a novel VR platform (AescularVR) in assessing acetabular component orientation in a simulated model used in surgical training. The AescularVR platform was developed using the HTC Vive® VR system hardware, including wireless trackers attached to the surgical instruments and pelvic sawbone. Following calibration, data on the relative position of both trackers are used to determine the acetabular cup orientation (version and inclination). The acetabular cup was manually implanted across a range of orientations representative of those expected intra-operatively. Simultaneous readings from the Vicon® optical motion capture system were used as the ‘gold standard’ for comparison. Correlation and agreement between these two methods was determined using Bland-Altman plots, Pearson's correlation co-efficient, and linear regression modelling.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
To evaluate the performance of this institution in its delivery of care to elderly patients with a hip fracture over an 11-year period and to establish recommendations to improve practice. Regular prospective audits of a cohort of 50 patients have been undertaken between 1990 and 2000. A larger and more comprehensive retrospective audit of 100 patients was performed in 2001. Goals were set regarding time to admission, time to surgery and to discharge in close accordance with the best practice guidelines devised by the Royal College of Physicians in 1989. There has been an alarming decline in standards in key areas.
Time from A&
E to admission: at best 78% of patients within 3 hours, 4% in 2001. Time from admission to surgery: at best 89% within 24 hours, 31% in 2001. Persistence of significant morbidity for patients delayed to surgery for non-medical reasons: 65% of these patients developed a post operative complication and 20% died within 30 days of admission. Delay to discharge: at best 13 acute bed days, now 18 (2001). Current practice is less than ideal. Clinical governance involves a dual responsibility – of the clinician to maintain high standards and of the management to provide adequate resources. Both need addressing to reverse the current trend.
We report a consecutive series of 352 patients with back pain treated by Dynesys flexible stabilisation between July 2000 and November 2004, to include perceived indications, surgical techniques and complications. A detailed analysis of the first 120 cases with minimum follow up of 2 years is included. Our unit has undertaken 352 operations to date, and this communication reports all cases. Follow up is to 48 months. All patients were profiled prospectively using the Oswestry Disability Index, Euroquol, SF36, Pain analogue scale, Pain chart and modified Zung. The same measuring instruments were used at review for which follow up was 100% The procedure involves paired bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation above and below the level of perceived pathology, with each screw pair connected by load relieving carbopolyurethane flexible spacers, in conjunction with a tension band polyethylene cord passed through the spacer. This construct is then held under tension with screws in the main pedicle screws. All patients are profiled at entry to the hospital service using a proforma which includes the measures outlined above. Conservative treatment is arranged by the centre, and includes physiotherapy to the point of failure. All our cases have failed conservative treatment before enrolling for surgery. There was significant improvement in symptoms for most of the patients in the series. However clear patterns emerged as to those cases in which Dynesys is contra-indicated. This is the largest series of cases reviewed so far in the literature.
The procedure involves, at each segment, cephalad and caudad pedicle screws connected with a polycarbourethane spacer and polyethylene cord. It achieves load relief and controlled flexion. Since 1996, 7000 procedures have been undertaken globally.
Where root compression was present, a midline approach and posterior screw placement was used in conjunction with open decompression. With back pain alone a bilateral Wiltse approach and posterolateral placement was used. All patients were assessed pre and post surgery with SF36, Oswestry Disability Index and pain analogue scores and modified Zung. Standing radiographs were obtained post surgery and at review. Follow up was at 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks in addition to this review.
The present series is early, but gives grounds for encouragement. Screw loosening and failure are technical problems detracting from the result and require further development. We are continuing to use the technique.
INTRODUCTION: We report a series of 90 patients enrolled in a prospective study of Dynesys stabilisation reviewed at 12 to 30 months. The procedure involves, at each segment, cephalad and caudad pedicle screws connected with a polycarbo-urethane spacer and polyethylene cord. It achieves load relief and controlled flexion. Since 1996, 7000 procedures have been undertaken globally. METHOD: Indications are analogous to consideration for fusion. Entry criteria included (1) unresolved and unacceptable lumbar back pain despite protracted conservative management and (2) definite pathology where symptoms could be abolished by anaesthetising the target segments. Where root compression was present, a midline approach and posterior screw placement was used in conjunction with open decompression. With back pain alone a bilateral Wiltse approach and posterolateral placement was used. All patients were assessed pre- and post-surgery with SF36, Oswestry Disability Index and pain analogue scores and Modified Zung. Standing radiographs were obtained post- surgery and at review. Follow-up was at six, 12, 24 and 52 weeks in addition to this review. RESULTS: Follow-up was 100%. 89 patients survived. Mobilisation was achieved on day 1 and discharge usually by day 2. Based on the above outcome measures and patient satisfaction good to excellent results were achieved in 74% (66/89). Screw loosening or breakage occurred in 8%, and was associated with a poor result. DISCUSSION: Dynesys flexible stabilisation offers a simple alternative to fusion with less potential for adjacent ‘Domino’ failure. It differs from tension ligament systems such as Graf. At this stage the results appear at least as good as a comparable cohort of fusion patients. The present series is early, but gives grounds for encouragement. Screw loosening and failure are technical problems detracting from the result and require further development. We are continuing to use the technique.
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of discitis using conventional methods can be prolonged and unrewarding. Patients can have prolonged pain and persistently elevated Inflammatory markers. We propose a new method of treatment of severe cases, and present two cases where this method has successfully been used. METHOD: Once discitis has been diagnosed clinically and radiologically, a percutaneous discectomy of the infected level is performed. Matter is sent for microbiological analysis. An epidural catheter is then left in the infected disc space cavity. This is then used to administer appropriate antibiotics directly into the infected cavity. After one week the patient is converted on to intravenous antibiotics, for a further two weeks, then a prolonged course of oral antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Discitis can be a difficult and unrewarding condition to treat. This novel method appears to be a new and effective mode of treatment, for both acute and chronic infections, although it does require further evaluation.