Medial fix bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) designs are consider safe and effective implants with many registries data and big cohort series showing excellent survivorship and clinical outcome comparable to that reported for the most expensive and surgically challenging medial UKR mobile bearing designs. However, whether all polyethylene tibial components (all-poly) provided comparable results to metal-backed modular components during medial fix bearing UKR remains unclear. There have been previous suggestions that all-poly tibia UKR implants might show unacceptable higher rates of early failure due to tibial component early loosening especially in high body max index (BMI) patients. This study aims to find out the short and long-term survival rate of all-poly tibia UKR and its relationship with implant thickness and patient demographics including sex, age, ASA and BMI. we present the results of a series of 388 medial fixed bearing all-polly tibia UKR done in our institution by a single surgeon between 2007–2019.Abstract
Introduction
Material and Methods
The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA.Aims
Methods
The aim of this retrospective audit was to determine the route of referral or presentation of patients requiring revision following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 4802 patients were implanted with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A* cementless implant (Corail/Pinnacle) between 2005 and 2015; 80 patients with a mean age of 67.8 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
Young, high-demand patients with large post-traumatic tibial osteochondral defects are difficult to treat. Fresh osteochondral allografting is a joint-preserving treatment option that is well-established for such defects. Our objectives were to investigate the long-term graft survivorships, functional outcomes and associated complications for this technique. We prospectively recruited patients who had received fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic tibial plateau defects over 3cm in diameter and 1cm in depth with a minimum of 5 years follow-up. The grafts were retrieved within 24 hours, stored in cefalozolin/bacitracin solution at 4°C, non-irradiated and used within 72 hours. Tissue matching was not performed but joints were matched for size and morphology. Realignment osteotomies were performed for malaligned limbs. The Modified Hospital for Knee Surgery Scoring System (MHKSS) was used for functional outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with conversion to TKR as end point for graft failure.Introduction
Methods
An osteochondral defect in the knees of young active patients represents a treatment challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. Early studies with allogenic cartilage transplantation showed this tissue to be immunologically privileged, showed fresh grafts to maintain hyaline cartilage, and surviving chondrocytes several years after implantation. Between January 1978 and October 1995 we enrolled 63 patients in a prospective non-randomised study of fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic distal femur defects in our institute. Five international patients who were lost to follow-up were excluded from this study. The indications for the procedure were: patients younger than 50 years of age having unipolar post-traumatic defects, or osteochondritis dissecans larger than three cm in diameter and one cm in depth.Background
Methods
