Surgical management of PJI remains challenging with patients failing treatment despite the best efforts. An important question is whether these later failures reflect reinfection or the persistence of infection. Proponents of reinfection believe hosts are vulnerable to developing infection and new organisms emerge. The alternative hypothesis is that later failure is a result of an organism that was present in the joint but was not picked up by initial culture or was not a pathogen initially but became so under antibiotic pressure. This multicenter study explores the above dilemma. Utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS), we hypothesize that failures after two stage exchange arthroplasty can be caused by an organism that was present at the time of initial surgery but not isolated by culture. This prospective study involving 15 institutions collected samples from 635 revision total hip (n=310) and knee (n=325) arthroplasties. Synovial fluid, tissue and swabs were obtained intraoperatively for NGS analysis. Patients were classified per 2018 Consensus definition of PJI. Treatment failure was defined as reoperation for infection that yielded positive cultures, during minimum 1-year follow-up. Concordance of the infecting pathogen cultured at failure with NGS analysis at initial revision was determined.Introduction
Methods
The study was designed to observe the patients emotional and physical response to total disc replacement surgery in the cervical spine. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) surgery at our institution. Surgery was carried for radicular and or axial neck pain. The Activ-C TDR (Aesculap) was used. Pre and post operative data was collected using validated questionnaires. 13 Consecutive patients from Nov 2007 to Aug 2008 were studied. All patients were planned for surgical intervention for symptomatic degenerative cervical disc disease at single or multiple levels. 7 male, 6 female. The Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to assess the psychological impact. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to assess the physical impact of the surgery. NDI shows a significant improvement at 6 and 12 months (p= 0.002 and p=0.02 respectively). The VAS also shows significant improvement at 6 and 12 months (p=0.004 and 0.008 respectively) The CES-D improved but failed to show any significant improvement at either interval. In our patient population surgical intervention with TDR for degenerative disc disease offers significant physical benefit over the short term. This does not correlate with an improvement in their emotional state.
