We sought to determine the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes. We performed an electronic search up to December 2021 using the following terms: “(mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty)”. Peer-reviewed, English language studies regarding THA outcomes were analyzed for preoperative patient mental health metrics and objective postoperative results regarding pain, functionality and surgical complications. We extracted study data, assessed the risk of bias of included studies, grouped them by outcome measure and performed a GRADE assessment. Seventeen of 702 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Overall, compared to cohorts with a normal psychological status, patients with higher objective measures of preoperative depression and anxiety reported increased postoperative pain, decreased functionality and greater complications following THA. Additionally, participants with lower self-efficacy or somatization were found to have worse functional outcomes. Following surgery, both early and late pain scores remained higher in patients with preoperative depression and anxiety. Preoperative depression and anxiety may negatively impact patient reported postoperative pain, physical function and complications following THA. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the heterogeneity of studies, specifically the use of differing pain scales and measures of physical and psychological function as well as varied follow-up times. Future research could test interventions to treat pre-operative depression or anxiety and explore longitudinal outcomes in THA patients. Surgeons should consider the preoperative psychological status when counseling patients regarding expected surgical outcomes and attempt to treat a patient's depression or anxiety prior to undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
The results of the original mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing because of high dislocation rates (11%). This original implant used a flat bearing articulation on the tibial tray. To address the issue of dislocation a new implant (domed tibia with biconcave bearing to increase entrapment) was introduced with a modified surgical technique. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of dislocation between a domed and flat lateral UKR. Separate geometric computer models of an Oxford mobile bearing lateral UKR were generated for the two types of articulation between the tibial component and the meniscal bearing: Flat-on-flat (flat) and Concave-on-convex (domed). Each type of mobile bearing was used to investigate three distinct dislocation modes observed clinically: lateral to medial dislocation, with the bearing resting on the tray wall (L-M-Wall); medial to lateral dislocation, out of the joint space (M-L); anterior to posterior dislocation, out of the joint space (A-P). A size C tray and a medium femoral component and bearing were used in all models. The femoral component, tibial tray and bearing were first aligned in a neutral position. For each dislocation the tibial tray was restrained in all degrees of freedom. The femoral component was restrained from moving in the anterior-posterior directions and in the medial-lateral directions. The femoral component was also restrained from rotating about the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral and superior-inferior directions. This meant that the femoral component was only able to move in the superior-inferior direction. Different bearing sizes were inserted into the model and the effect that moving the femoral component medially and laterally had on the amount of distraction required to cause bearing dislocation was investigated.Introduction
Methods
